The management of Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis in different medical settings: Where does that leave us? An Italian nationwide survey.

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis (FPF) is an emerging group of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) caused by mutations mainly involving "telomere-related genes" and "surfactant-related genes". Although, in 2023, European Respiratory Society proposed a statement for FPFs management, these still remain a burden. Our work aimed to evaluate the management and impact of FPF in three Italian different medical settings: University Hospitals (UHs), non-University Hospitals (N-UHs) and outpatient clinics.

METHODS

This survey was created by ILDs Study Group Società Italiana di Pneumologia/ Italian Respiratory Society (SIP-IRS) and diffused via email to all SIP-IRS members. The descriptive statistical analysis was conducted through GraphPad Prism software (version 8.0).  Results: Twenty participants replied to the survey, of which 65% (13/20) worked at UH while the remaining 25% (6/20) and 5% (1/20) worked at N-UH and outpatient clinics, respectively. Centers with, at least, 150 ILD patients visits/year followed a higher number of FPF patients, regardless of University affiliation (p=0.0046). Despite significant discrepancies in genetic testing and availability of counselling were registered, no statistically significant differences in patients' anamnesis assessment were observed between UHs and N-UHs (p=0.4192 and p=0.6525). However, there were relevant differences in the number of FPF patients undergoing genetic assessment in the Centers with Genetics Lab or Unit inside the Hospital (p=0.0253). There was no consensus regarding the impact of FPF diagnosis on lung transplantation and screening of asymptomatic relatives. Similarly, no differences were reported in antifibrotic prescriptions between UHs and N-UHs. Although the typical UIP pattern was the most common radiological pattern observed in FPF patients, there were no differences in the prevalence of histopathological patterns between UH and N-UH.

CONCLUSIONS

Improving pulmonologists' knowledge of the approach, diagnosis and management of FPF is a global medical topic. Scientific societies can provide significant support in raising physicians' awareness of this issue.