Guo Xin, Xu Ying, Meng Yao, Lian Hao, He Jingwen, Zhang Ruike, Xu Jingzhou, Wang Hao, Xu Shuyu, Cai Wenpeng, Xiao Lei, Su Tong, Tang Yunxiang
Department of Medical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Department of Diving and Hyperbaric Medical Research, Naval Special Medical Center, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Nat Sci Sleep. 2024 Sep 19;16:1431-1449. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S471930. eCollection 2024.
Napping deprivation in habitual nappers leads to cognitive impairment. The ameliorative effect of acute aerobic exercise has been demonstrated for this post-cognitive impairment. However, it is still unclear which intensity of aerobic exercise is the most effective and how long this improvement can be sustained.
Fifty-eight healthy adults with a chronic napping habit were randomly assigned to four intervention groups after undergoing nap deprivation: a sedentary control group, a low-intensity exercise group (50-59% maximum heart rate, HR), a moderate-intensity exercise group (60-69% HR), and a high-intensity exercise group (70-79% HR). Working memory (N-back task), vigilance (Psychomotor Vigilance Task, PVT), and response inhibitory capacity (Go/NoGo task) were measured.
Regression analyses showed a quadratic trend between exercise intensity and working memory reaction time and accuracy ( =3.297-5.769, < 0.05, =10.7-18.9%). The effects of exercise were optimal at low-intensity. There was a significant quadratic trend between exercise intensity and PVT lapse ( =4.314, =0.042, =7.2%). The effect of exercise increased with higher intensity. Prolonged observation found that the effect of low-intensity exercise on working memory was maintained for 2 hours.
The effect of low-intensity exercise might be underestimated. Low-intensity exercise significantly improved working memory performance, and the effects could be maintained throughout the afternoon. In contrast, the effects of high-intensity exercise were unlikely to be maintained and might even have negative effects. Future researchers can broaden the categories of participants to enhance the external validity and collect diverse physiological indicators to explore related physiological mechanisms.
习惯性午睡者的午睡剥夺会导致认知障碍。急性有氧运动对这种认知障碍后的改善作用已得到证实。然而,尚不清楚哪种强度的有氧运动最有效,以及这种改善能持续多久。
58名有长期午睡习惯的健康成年人在经历午睡剥夺后被随机分为四个干预组:久坐对照组、低强度运动组(最大心率的50 - 59%,HR)、中等强度运动组(60 - 69% HR)和高强度运动组(70 - 79% HR)。测量工作记忆(n-back任务)、警觉性(心理运动警觉任务,PVT)和反应抑制能力(Go/NoGo任务)。
回归分析显示运动强度与工作记忆反应时间和准确性之间呈二次趋势( =3.297 - 5.769, < 0.05, =10.7 - 18.9%)。低强度运动时运动效果最佳。运动强度与PVT失误之间存在显著的二次趋势( =4.314, =0.042, =7.2%)。运动效果随强度增加而增强。长期观察发现,低强度运动对工作记忆的影响持续2小时。
低强度运动的效果可能被低估。低强度运动显著改善工作记忆表现,且效果可维持整个下午。相比之下,高强度运动的效果不太可能维持,甚至可能产生负面影响。未来研究人员可扩大参与者类别以提高外部效度,并收集多种生理指标以探索相关生理机制。