Suppr超能文献

在评估肩部活动范围时,数字活动范围测量设备与传统测角法相比效果如何?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

How do digital range of motion measurement devices 'measure-up' to traditional goniometry in assessing shoulder range of motion? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Shepherd J, Hansjee S, Divall P, Raval P, Singh H P

机构信息

Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.

University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Jul;16(4):363-381. doi: 10.1177/17585732231195554. Epub 2023 Aug 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shoulder range of motion (ROM) is traditionally measured using universal goniometry. However, novel devices to measure shoulder ROM digitally are becoming increasingly available. We aimed to synthesise the current evidence to answer: 1) what technologies are currently in use? 2) Are they reliable? 3) How do they compare to goniometry?

METHODS

Systematic review of the literature was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Emcare and Cochrane databases were searched to identify studies comparing a digital device measuring shoulder ROM to goniometry in participants > = 18years. Quality of studies was assessed using COSMIN risk of bias tool. End points included device validity compared to goniometry and intra-rater reliability.

RESULTS

15 articles were included, representing 372 participants and 608 shoulders, and reporting data for five device categories; infrared/RGB-D, 3D-motion-analysis, combined 3D/infra-red, 2D-video-analysis and virtual-reality. Nine studies reported mean bias and 95% limits of agreement (LOA) compared to goniometry. Pooled mean bias was -0.25 degrees (-1.25, 0.75 95% LOA, random effects model) overall. This did not differ by device type (p = 0.83), sensor or non-sensor-based devices (p = 0.62) or plane of movement (p = 0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

These devices compare well to goniometry and represent a possible means of increasing efficiency and facilitating telemedicine.

摘要

背景

传统上使用通用测角计测量肩部活动范围(ROM)。然而,越来越多可用于数字测量肩部ROM的新型设备问世。我们旨在综合现有证据以回答以下问题:1)目前正在使用哪些技术?2)它们是否可靠?3)与测角计相比如何?

方法

根据PRISMA指南对文献进行系统综述。检索MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、Emcare和Cochrane数据库,以识别在≥18岁参与者中比较数字测量肩部ROM的设备与测角计的研究。使用COSMIN偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。终点包括与测角计相比的设备有效性和评估者内信度。

结果

纳入15篇文章,涉及372名参与者和608个肩部,并报告了五类设备的数据;红外/RGB-D、三维运动分析、三维/红外组合、二维视频分析和虚拟现实。9项研究报告了与测角计相比的平均偏差和95%一致性界限(LOA)。总体合并平均偏差为-0.25度(-1.25,0.75 95% LOA,随机效应模型)。这在设备类型(p = 0.83)、基于传感器或非传感器的设备(p = 0.62)或运动平面(p = 0.91)方面没有差异。

结论

这些设备与测角计相比效果良好,是提高效率和促进远程医疗的一种可能手段。

相似文献

5
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
8
Electrotherapy modalities for rotator cuff disease.用于肩袖疾病的电疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 10;2016(6):CD012225. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012225.
10
Manual therapy and exercise for rotator cuff disease.肩袖疾病的手法治疗与运动疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 10;2016(6):CD012224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012224.

本文引用的文献

3
An algorithmic approach to shoulder pathology.一种针对肩部病理学的算法方法。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Sep;11(9):5510-5515. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_475_21. Epub 2022 Oct 14.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验