• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用世卫组织整合框架为德国制定学校 COVID-19 指南

Using the WHO-INTEGRATE framework to develop a COVID-19 guideline for schools, Germany.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Elisabeth-Winterhalter-Weg 6, 81377Munich, Germany.

Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Oct 1;102(10):742-748. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.291550. Epub 2024 Aug 27.

DOI:10.2471/BLT.24.291550
PMID:39318890
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11418849/
Abstract

PROBLEM

At the beginning of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, reliable, globally applicable recommendations for safe and continuous school operations were lacking.

APPROACH

In October 2020, the German Association of Scientific Medical Societies' task force for COVID-19 guidelines and public health researchers at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München initiated the rapid development of a living evidence- and consensus-based guideline to reduce severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 transmission in schools. To facilitate transparent, structured and comprehensive decision-making with a whole-of-society perspective, they applied the WHO-INTEGRATE evidence-to-decision framework. This framework supported a broad, multisectoral composition of the guideline panel. The panel used newly synthesized evidence on nine school measures. Participating medical societies or the guideline secretariat completed evidence-to-decision tables. They also drafted recommendations for the guideline panel, who discussed and revised them during moderated consensus conferences.

LOCAL SETTING

In Germany, each state is responsible for organizing schooling. The German Association of Scientific Medical Societies coordinates development of evidence- and consensus-based guidelines.

RELEVANT CHANGES

The first version of the guideline was published in February 2021, and the guideline dissemination created much media attention. Of the 16 state education ministries, almost all knew about the guideline, nine recognized it as a relevant source of information and five used it to check existing directives.

LESSONS LEARNT

The WHO-INTEGRATE framework facilitated a comprehensive assessment of school measures from the start of guideline development, considering the broad societal impact of the measures. Using the framework in rapid mode was feasible, but it fell short of its potential.

摘要

问题

在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行开始时,缺乏可靠的、适用于全球的安全和持续学校运作建议。

方法

2020 年 10 月,德国科学医学协会 COVID-19 指南工作组和慕尼黑路德维希-马克西米利安大学的公共卫生研究人员启动了一项快速制定活的循证和共识指南的工作,以减少学校中严重急性呼吸系统综合症冠状病毒 2 的传播。为了促进具有全社会视角的透明、结构化和全面决策,他们应用了世界卫生组织综合证据决策框架。该框架支持指南小组的广泛、多部门组成。小组使用了关于九项学校措施的新综合证据。参与的医学协会或指南秘书处完成了证据决策表。他们还为指南小组起草了建议,指南小组在经过协调的共识会议上进行了讨论和修订。

当地背景

在德国,每个州都负责组织学校教育。德国科学医学协会协调循证和共识指南的制定。

相关变化

该指南的第一版于 2021 年 2 月发布,指南的传播引起了媒体的广泛关注。在 16 个州教育部门中,几乎所有部门都知道该指南,其中 9 个部门认为该指南是相关信息的来源,5 个部门使用该指南来检查现有指令。

经验教训

从指南制定开始,世界卫生组织综合框架就便于对学校措施进行全面评估,考虑到这些措施对全社会的广泛影响。以快速模式使用该框架是可行的,但未能充分发挥其潜力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/415d/11418849/b20384c38c32/BLT.24.291550-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/415d/11418849/b20384c38c32/BLT.24.291550-F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/415d/11418849/b20384c38c32/BLT.24.291550-F1.jpg

相似文献

1
Using the WHO-INTEGRATE framework to develop a COVID-19 guideline for schools, Germany.使用世卫组织整合框架为德国制定学校 COVID-19 指南
Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Oct 1;102(10):742-748. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.291550. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
2
Rapid development of an evidence- and consensus-based guideline for controlling transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in schools during a public health emergency - A process evaluation.在突发公共卫生事件期间,基于证据和共识制定学校中控制 SARS-CoV-2 传播的指南的快速制定——过程评估。
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 30;11:1075210. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1075210. eCollection 2023.
3
Assessing the impact of an evidence- and consensus-based guideline for controlling SARS-CoV-2 transmission in German schools on decision-making processes: a multi-component qualitative analysis.评估基于证据和共识的德国学校 2019 冠状病毒病传播控制指南对决策过程的影响:一项多部分定性分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Dec 19;21(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01072-9.
4
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.学校为遏制新冠疫情而采取的措施:一项范围综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 17;12(12):CD013812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013812.
5
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
6
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为遏制新冠疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 2;5(5):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.pub2.
7
Quarantine alone or in combination with other public health measures to control COVID-19: a rapid review.单独隔离或与其他公共卫生措施相结合以控制新冠病毒病:一项快速综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 15;9(9):CD013574. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013574.pub2.
8
Integrating Chinese and western medicine for COVID-19: A living evidence-based guideline (version 1).中西医结合治疗 COVID-19:活证据指南(第 1 版)。
J Evid Based Med. 2021 Dec;14(4):313-332. doi: 10.1111/jebm.12444. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
9
Applying the WHO-INTEGRATE evidence-to-decision framework in the development of WHO guidelines on parenting interventions: step-by-step process and lessons learnt.运用世卫组织整合证据决策框架制定世卫组织育儿干预措施指南:逐步过程和经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jul 5;22(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01165-z.
10
WICID framework version 1.0: criteria and considerations to guide evidence-informed decision-making on non-pharmacological interventions targeting COVID-19.WICID 框架 1.0 版:指导针对 COVID-19 的非药物干预措施进行循证决策的标准和考虑因素。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Nov;5(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003699.

本文引用的文献

1
Informing pandemic management in Germany with trustworthy living evidence syntheses and guideline development: lessons learned from the COVID-19 evidence ecosystem.利用可靠的实时证据综合分析和指南制定为德国的大流行管理提供信息:从 COVID-19 证据生态系统中吸取的经验教训。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Sep;173:111456. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111456. Epub 2024 Jul 14.
2
Applying the WHO-INTEGRATE evidence-to-decision framework in the development of WHO guidelines on parenting interventions: step-by-step process and lessons learnt.运用世卫组织整合证据决策框架制定世卫组织育儿干预措施指南:逐步过程和经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jul 5;22(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01165-z.
3
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.
学校为遏制新冠疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 2;5(5):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.pub2.
4
Assessing the impact of an evidence- and consensus-based guideline for controlling SARS-CoV-2 transmission in German schools on decision-making processes: a multi-component qualitative analysis.评估基于证据和共识的德国学校 2019 冠状病毒病传播控制指南对决策过程的影响:一项多部分定性分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Dec 19;21(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01072-9.
5
Unintended consequences of measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.学校为控制 COVID-19 大流行而实施的措施产生的意外后果:范围综述。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 6;6(6):CD015397. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015397.
6
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.
7
The WHO-INTEGRATE evidence to decision framework version 1.0: integrating WHO norms and values and a complexity perspective.世界卫生组织-整合证据到决策框架第1.0版:整合世界卫生组织的规范和价值观以及复杂性视角。
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jan 25;4(Suppl 1):e000844. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000844. eCollection 2019.
8
The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions.卫生系统和公共卫生决策中的 GRADE 证据决策(EtD)框架。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 May 29;16(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0320-2.