Mangone Elizabeth, Shahriary Eashan, Bosch Pamela
Department of Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine-Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, College of Health and Human Services, Northern Arizona University, Phoenix Bioscience Core, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
PM R. 2025 May;17(5):522-528. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13266. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
This study investigated the association between stroke severity, functional status measured by the Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility-Patient Assessment Instrument (IRF-PAI), and community discharge from IRF.
Aim one examined the association between National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores measured during the acute care stay and IRF admission functional status, measured by the admission IRF-PAI self-care and mobility functional measures, to deduce if functional measures can serve as a proxy for stroke severity. Aim two investigated the ability of the NIHSS and IRF-PAI admission functional measures to predict community discharge from IRF after stroke.
Retrospective cohort study using electronic health records and Uniform Data System. Medical Record file data from January 1, 2018, to December 30, 2019.
Academic hospital-based IRF.
Five hundred forty-four patients transferred from acute care hospital to IRF after an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. Exclusion criteria included a transient ischemic attack, discharge against medical advice, death during IRF stay, or readmission to acute care within 48 hours of IRF admission.
Not applicable.
Admission IRF-PAI self-care and mobility scores and discharge status from IRF.
Of the 544 patients, 76.7% had community discharge. NIHSS scores were significantly associated with IRF-PAI admission self-care scores across each NIHSS stroke category. There was no statistically significant association between NIHSS and IRF-PAI admission mobility score. IRF admission self-care and mobility scores were each statistically significant predictors of community discharge (odds ratio [OR] = 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-1.17; OR = 1.10, CI: 1.03-1.18, respectively). NIHSS scores were not a statistically significant predictor of community discharge (OR = 0.70, CI: 0.47-1.04) from IRF.
IRF-PAI self-care functional measure is associated with the NIHSS and can serve as a proxy for stroke severity. IRF-PAI self-care and mobility measures each predict community discharge.
本研究调查了卒中严重程度、通过住院康复机构患者评估工具(IRF-PAI)测量的功能状态与从住院康复机构出院回归社区之间的关联。
目标一检查急性护理期间测量的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分与通过入院IRF-PAI自我护理和活动功能测量所测得的住院康复机构入院时功能状态之间的关联,以推断功能测量是否可作为卒中严重程度的替代指标。目标二调查NIHSS和IRF-PAI入院功能测量预测卒中后从住院康复机构出院回归社区的能力。
使用电子健康记录和统一数据系统的回顾性队列研究。2018年1月1日至2019年12月30日的病历档案数据。
基于学术医院的住院康复机构。
544例缺血性或出血性卒中后从急性护理医院转入住院康复机构的患者。排除标准包括短暂性脑缺血发作、违反医嘱出院、在住院康复机构住院期间死亡或在住院康复机构入院后48小时内再次入住急性护理医院。
不适用。
入院时IRF-PAI自我护理和活动评分以及从住院康复机构的出院状态。
在544例患者中,76.7%出院回归社区。在每个NIHSS卒中类别中,NIHSS评分与IRF-PAI入院自我护理评分显著相关。NIHSS与IRF-PAI入院活动评分之间无统计学显著关联。IRF入院自我护理和活动评分各自都是出院回归社区的统计学显著预测因素(优势比[OR]=1.10,95%置信区间[CI]:1.03-1.17;OR=1.10,CI:1.03-1.18)。NIHSS评分不是从住院康复机构出院回归社区(OR=0.70,CI:0.47-1.04)的统计学显著预测因素。
IRF-PAI自我护理功能测量与NIHSS相关,可作为卒中严重程度的替代指标。IRF-PAI自我护理和活动测量各自都能预测出院回归社区。