Suppr超能文献

PARADIGM-HF 研究中的沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗心力衰竭伴射血分数降低患者的无症状与有症状低血压

Asymptomatic vs Symptomatic Hypotension With Sacubitril/Valsartan in Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction in PARADIGM-HF.

机构信息

British Heart Foundation Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Saarland University, Klink für Innere Medizin III (Kardiologie, Angiologie und Internistische Intensivmedizin), Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Oct 29;84(18):1685-1700. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.08.012. Epub 2024 Sep 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypotension is an important clinical problem in heart failure (HF).

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to examine the association between asymptomatic vs symptomatic hypotension and outcomes in PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure).

METHODS

In a post hoc analysis of PARADIGM-HF, the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan compared to enalapril were estimated using time-updated Cox proportional hazards models. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization.

RESULTS

Among 8,399 patients in PARADIGM-HF, 1,343 (16.0%) experienced only asymptomatic hypotension, and 936 (11.1%) experienced symptomatic hypotension at least once after randomization. Patients with symptomatic hypotension were older and more frequently had cardiovascular comorbidities compared to those developing only asymptomatic hypotension. By contrast, left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in those with asymptomatic hypotension. Patients who experienced either type of hypotension were at higher risk for all outcomes examined. However, the effect of sacubitril/valsartan on the primary outcome was not diminished in patients experiencing hypotension compared to those who did not: the HR for sacubitril/valsartan vs enalapril was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.72-0.89) for no hypotension, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.70-1.08) for asymptomatic hypotension, and 0.51 (95% CI: 0.38-0.69) for symptomatic hypotension (P = 0.01), and this was also true for cardiovascular and all-cause deaths. The safety of sacubitril/valsartan vs enalapril was also maintained regardless of the occurrence of hypotension. Discontinuation of randomized treatment was less common with sacubitril/valsartan vs enalapril in patients experiencing asymptomatic and symptomatic hypotension.

CONCLUSIONS

Although both asymptomatic and symptomatic hypotension during treatment with sacubitril/valsartan or enalapril were associated with worse outcomes, the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan were maintained (or even enhanced) in patients experiencing hypotension.

摘要

背景

低血压是心力衰竭(HF)中的一个重要临床问题。

目的

本研究旨在探讨无症状性与有症状性低血压与 PARADIGM-HF(沙库巴曲缬沙坦与 ACEI 前瞻性比较以确定对心力衰竭全球死亡率和发病率的影响)研究中的结局之间的关联。

方法

在 PARADIGM-HF 的事后分析中,使用时间更新的 Cox 比例风险模型估计沙库巴曲缬沙坦与依那普利相比的疗效和安全性。主要结局是心血管死亡或 HF 住院。

结果

在 PARADIGM-HF 的 8399 例患者中,1343 例(16.0%)仅经历无症状性低血压,936 例(11.1%)在随机分组后至少经历过一次有症状性低血压。与仅发生无症状性低血压的患者相比,有症状性低血压的患者年龄更大,且更常合并心血管合并症。相比之下,无症状性低血压患者的左心室射血分数较低。经历任何类型低血压的患者所有检查结局的风险均更高。然而,与未发生低血压的患者相比,在发生低血压的患者中,沙库巴曲缬沙坦对主要结局的影响并未减弱:沙库巴曲缬沙坦与依那普利相比的 HR 为无低血压时为 0.80(95%CI:0.72-0.89),无症状性低血压时为 0.87(95%CI:0.70-1.08),有症状性低血压时为 0.51(95%CI:0.38-0.69)(P=0.01),这对心血管死亡和全因死亡也是如此。沙库巴曲缬沙坦与依那普利的安全性也保持不变,无论是否发生低血压。与依那普利相比,在发生无症状性和有症状性低血压的患者中,沙库巴曲缬沙坦的随机治疗停药率较低。

结论

尽管沙库巴曲缬沙坦或依那普利治疗期间发生无症状性和有症状性低血压均与结局较差相关,但沙库巴曲缬沙坦的获益在发生低血压的患者中仍得以维持(甚至增强)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验