Givens Ritt R, Brown Melanie, Malka Matan S, Lu Kevin, Zervos Thomas M, Roye Benjamin D, Pinyavat Teeda, Flynn John M, Vitale Michael G
Division of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Division of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Spine Deform. 2025 Jan;13(1):123-133. doi: 10.1007/s43390-024-00964-2. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
Teamwork and communication are important components of any surgical team. This study uses a simple, reproducible, and quantitative "team consistency score" and a nodal-based model for examining prior interactions amongst team members to represent and quantify the regularity of an OR team for a specific surgical case.
The electronic medical record (EMR) at our institution was queried for pediatric patients undergoing spinal surgery from January 2021 through December 2023. The number of prior interactions between individuals filling distinct roles in the OR for each case was recorded. A metric coined the consistency score was developed representing the sum total of these prior interactions standardized to a reference case. Spearman's Correlation as well as the Mann-Whitney comparison test were used to analyze the associations between case team consistency score and efficiency measures.
154 cases were included for analysis. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between case consistency score and both anesthesia time (rho = -0.159; p < 0.05) and patient preparation time (rho = -0.218; p < 0.01). When looking at the consistent (above median consistency score of 0.46) vs. inconsistent cohorts, the inconsistent cohort had a higher mean patient preparation time (53.3 ± 14.0 min vs. 49.0 ± 9.3 min; p < 0.05), as well as a higher overall mean case length (336.6 ± 47.4 min vs. 321.9 ± 42.4 min; p < 0.05).
The findings suggest that increased team consistency, as measured by a "team consistency score" metric, is related to heightened efficiency and reduced intraoperative times.
团队合作与沟通是任何手术团队的重要组成部分。本研究采用一种简单、可重复且定量的“团队一致性评分”以及基于节点的模型来检查团队成员之间的先前互动,以呈现和量化特定手术病例的手术室团队的规律性。
查询了我们机构2021年1月至2023年12月期间接受脊柱手术的儿科患者的电子病历。记录了每个病例中手术室中担任不同角色的个体之间的先前互动次数。开发了一种名为一致性评分的指标,代表这些先前互动的总和,并根据参考病例进行标准化。使用斯皮尔曼相关性分析以及曼-惠特尼比较检验来分析病例团队一致性评分与效率指标之间的关联。
纳入154例病例进行分析。病例一致性评分与麻醉时间(rho = -0.159;p < 0.05)和患者准备时间(rho = -0.218;p < 0.01)之间均存在统计学显著的负相关。在观察一致性队列(高于中位数一致性评分0.46)与不一致队列时,不一致队列的平均患者准备时间更长(53.3 ± 14.0分钟 vs. 49.0 ± 9.3分钟;p < 0.05),总体平均病例时长也更长(336.6 ± 47.4分钟 vs. 321.9 ± 42.4分钟;p < 0.05)。
研究结果表明,通过“团队一致性评分”指标衡量的团队一致性提高与效率提升和术中时间缩短相关。