Basic Sciences Laboratory, Department of Physiotherapy, University of Peloponnese, Sparta, Greece; European University of Cyprus, Engomi, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Department of Physical Education and Sports Sciences of Serres, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Morphologie. 2024 Dec;108(363):100913. doi: 10.1016/j.morpho.2024.100913. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
Sectional anatomy knowledge is essential for a wide spectrum of health professionals and is extensively applied to their everyday practice. We performed a scoping review to find which are the most effective methods of teaching sectional anatomy.
We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library to detect articles which investigated the effectiveness of sectional anatomy education methods, based on test scores. From each included paper, we extracted: author(s), number of participants, the anatomical region or regions, the method or methods of sectional anatomy education and the outcomes concerning only the acquisition of sectional anatomy knowledge.
Seven studies were included. There were four articles, which involved combined teaching approaches, and three articles, which did not comprise such approaches. In all studies which evaluated the effectiveness of a combination of teaching methods (comprising three-dimensional digital or physical tools) compared to cross-sections only, the anatomy test scores were significantly higher in the first case. The students' interaction with the educational material significantly enhanced the effectiveness of the implemented methods.
The multimodal teaching of sectional anatomy, especially involving three-dimensional methods, both digital and physical, was more effective than teaching based only on cross-sections. The students' interaction with the educational material improved the effectiveness of the teaching, which they received. These outcomes may stimulate anatomy teachers to enhance sectional anatomy education and encourage researchers to shed more light on the investigation of the optimal teaching strategies.
断层解剖学知识对于广泛的医疗保健专业人员来说是必不可少的,并且广泛应用于他们的日常实践中。我们进行了范围界定综述,以确定教授断层解剖学最有效的方法。
我们在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Cochrane Library 中搜索了调查基于测试成绩的断层解剖学教育方法有效性的文章。从每篇纳入的论文中,我们提取了:作者、参与者人数、解剖区域、断层解剖学教育方法以及仅涉及获得断层解剖学知识的结果。
共纳入 7 项研究。其中有 4 篇文章涉及联合教学方法,3 篇文章则不包含此类方法。在所有评估组合教学方法(包括三维数字或物理工具)与仅横断面相比的有效性的研究中,前者的解剖学测试成绩显著更高。学生与教育材料的互动显著提高了所实施方法的有效性。
断层解剖学的多模式教学,特别是涉及三维方法,无论是数字的还是物理的,都比仅基于横断面的教学更有效。学生与教育材料的互动提高了他们所接受的教学效果。这些结果可能会激励解剖学教师加强断层解剖学教育,并鼓励研究人员更深入地研究最佳教学策略。