OBJECTIVES

Minimally invasive thymectomy is an accepted approach for early-stage thymic epithelial neoplasia, reducing pain and length of stay compared with open surgery. In this study, we compare robotic and video-assisted thymectomy to assess pathological resection status, overall and disease-free survival.

METHODS

Data were retrieved from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons prospectively maintained thymic database. Eighty-two international centres were invited to participate in the ESTS registry. Thirty-seven centres agreed to take part. We included all patients who had undergone complete thymectomy for malignancy through a minimally invasive approach and excluded patients in whom complete data were not available.

RESULTS

Between October 2001 and May 2021, a total of 899 patients with thymic malignancy underwent minimal access surgical resection and were included in the study. A propensity matched analysis was conducted with interrogation of 732 patients. Median age was 55 years, and 408 (56%) patients were female. Propensity matched was performed with 1:1 matching for surgical approach (video assisted = 366, robot assisted = 366). Robot-assisted surgery conferred significantly lower odds of incomplete resection (R1; 0.203 95% CI 0.13-0.317; P < 0.001). However, there was no difference in terms of overall and disease-free survival between the 2 techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis, after adjusting for thymoma stage, the odds of incomplete surgical resection were higher in patients undergoing video-assisted surgery than robotic. However, there was no difference in overall or disease-free survival. With data maturation and increased follow-up, this would need repeat analysis and perhaps may provide more credence to the concept of a prospective randomized study to compare outcomes in thymic epithelial neoplasia by surgical approach with a standardized pathological work-up.