• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人与电视辅助胸腔镜胸腺切除术治疗大胸腺上皮肿瘤:倾向评分匹配分析。

Robot versus video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy for large thymic epithelial tumors: a propensity-matched analysis.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, No. 10, Changjiang Route, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, 400042, China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2023 Oct 27;23(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02228-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-023-02228-8
PMID:37891506
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10612354/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) thymectomy and robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS) thymectomy have been suggested as technically sound approaches for early-stage thymic epithelial tumors. However, the choice of VATS or RATS thymectomy for large and advanced thymic epithelial tumors remains controversial. In this study, the perioperative outcomes of VATS and RATS thymectomy were compared in patients with large thymic epithelial tumors (size ≥5.0 cm).

METHODS

A total of 113 patients with large thymic epithelial tumors who underwent minimally invasive surgery were included. Sixty-three patients underwent RATS, and 50 patients underwent VATS. Patient characteristics and perioperative variables were compared.

RESULTS

Compared with the VATS group, the RATS group experienced a shorter operation time (median: 110 min vs.130 min; P < 0.001) and less blood loss (30.00 ml vs. 100.00 ml, P < 0.001). No patients in the RATS group needed conversion to open surgery, but in the VATS series, five patients required conversion to open procedures (0% vs. 14.29%, P = 0.054). The rate of concomitant resection in the RATS group was similar to that in the VATS group (11.43% vs. 5.71%; P = 0.673). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the duration of chest tube (P = 0.587), postoperative complications (P = 1.000), and the duration of postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.141).

CONCLUSION

For large thymic epithelial tumors, RATS thymectomy can be performed safely and effectively in a radical fashion. Due to the advanced optics and precise instrument control, concomitant resections can be easily achieved in larger thymic epithelial tumors using the robotic approach.

摘要

背景

视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)胸腺切除术和机器人辅助胸腔镜手术(RATS)胸腺切除术均被认为是早期胸腺瘤的技术可靠方法。然而,对于大型和晚期胸腺瘤,选择 VATS 还是 RATS 胸腺切除术仍存在争议。在这项研究中,比较了 VATS 和 RATS 胸腺切除术在大型胸腺瘤(大小≥5.0cm)患者中的围手术期结果。

方法

共纳入 113 例接受微创外科手术的大型胸腺瘤患者。63 例患者接受 RATS,50 例患者接受 VATS。比较患者特征和围手术期变量。

结果

与 VATS 组相比,RATS 组的手术时间更短(中位数:110min 比 130min;P<0.001),出血量更少(30.00ml 比 100.00ml,P<0.001)。RATS 组无患者需要转为开放手术,但在 VATS 组中有 5 例需要转为开放手术(0%比 14.29%,P=0.054)。RATS 组的同时切除率与 VATS 组相似(11.43%比 5.71%;P=0.673)。两组间胸腔引流管时间(P=0.587)、术后并发症(P=1.000)和术后住院时间(P=0.141)无显著差异。

结论

对于大型胸腺瘤,RATS 胸腺切除术可以安全有效地进行根治性切除。由于先进的光学和精确的器械控制,使用机器人方法可以轻松地在更大的胸腺瘤中进行同时切除。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47f6/10612354/e50f8b5e396f/12893_2023_2228_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47f6/10612354/b91d0b1f511b/12893_2023_2228_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47f6/10612354/e50f8b5e396f/12893_2023_2228_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47f6/10612354/b91d0b1f511b/12893_2023_2228_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47f6/10612354/e50f8b5e396f/12893_2023_2228_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Robot versus video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy for large thymic epithelial tumors: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人与电视辅助胸腔镜胸腺切除术治疗大胸腺上皮肿瘤:倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Surg. 2023 Oct 27;23(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02228-8.
2
Double sternal elevation subxiphoid versus uniportal thoracoscopic thymectomy associated with superior clearance for stage I-II thymic epithelial tumors: Subxiphoid thymectomy compared with VATS.剑突下双胸骨抬高术与单孔胸腔镜胸腺切除术治疗Ⅰ-Ⅱ期胸腺上皮肿瘤的上纵隔清扫效果比较:剑突下胸腺切除术与电视辅助胸腔镜手术的对比
Surgery. 2022 Jul;172(1):371-378. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.12.034. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
3
Perioperative outcomes comparison of robotic and video-assisted thoracoscopic thymectomy for thymic epithelial tumor: a single-center experience.机器人与电视辅助胸腔镜胸腺切除术治疗胸腺瘤的围手术期结局比较:单中心经验。
Updates Surg. 2024 Aug;76(4):1511-1519. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01702-5. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
4
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the surgical treatment of Masaoka stage I thymoma.胸腔镜手术与机器人辅助胸腔镜手术在 Masaoka Ⅰ期胸腺瘤外科治疗中的比较。
World J Surg Oncol. 2013 Jul 17;11:157. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-11-157.
5
National trends and perioperative outcomes of robotic resection of thymic tumours in the United States: a propensity matching comparison with open and video-assisted thoracoscopic approaches†.美国机器人胸腺肿瘤切除术的全国趋势和围手术期结果:与开放和电视辅助胸腔镜方法的倾向匹配比较†。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Oct 1;56(4):762-769. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz111.
6
Robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for thymic epithelial tumours, from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database.机器人辅助与电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗胸腺瘤:来自欧洲胸外科医师学会数据库。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Oct 1;66(4). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezae346.
7
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open surgery for Stage I thymic epithelial tumours: a propensity score-matched study.胸腔镜手术与开放手术治疗Ⅰ期胸腺癌:倾向评分匹配研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Dec 1;54(6):1037-1044. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy239.
8
Comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and median sternotomy approaches for thymic tumor resections at a single institution.单机构中电视辅助胸腔镜手术与正中胸骨切开术治疗胸腺肿瘤的比较。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2015 Feb;25(1):47-51. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000005.
9
Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for treatment of patients with thymoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助胸腔手术与电视辅助胸腔手术治疗胸腺瘤患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thorac Cancer. 2022 Jan;13(2):151-161. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14234. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
10
[Comparison of surgical approaches for thymic disorders: feasibility of VATS thymectomy and comparison with small incision and median sternotomy].胸腺疾病手术方式的比较:电视辅助胸腔镜手术胸腺切除术的可行性及与小切口手术和正中胸骨切开术的比较
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;51(8):737-40.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic thymectomy for large thymomas: a multicenter study.大型胸腺瘤的机器人胸腺切除术:一项多中心研究。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 19;19(1):307. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02476-1.
2
Surgical treatment of thymic epithelial tumor and myasthenia gravis.胸腺上皮肿瘤与重症肌无力的外科治疗
Front Surg. 2024 Nov 18;11:1467789. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1467789. eCollection 2024.
3
Long-term outcomes of robot versus video-assisted thymectomy for thymic epithelial tumors: a propensity matched analysis.机器人与电视辅助胸腺切除术治疗胸腺瘤的长期结果:倾向评分匹配分析。

本文引用的文献

1
Robot-assisted thymectomy in large anterior mediastinal tumors: A comparative study with video-assisted thymectomy and open surgery.机器人辅助胸腺切除术治疗大前纵隔肿瘤:与电视辅助胸腺切除术和开放性手术的对比研究。
Thorac Cancer. 2023 Jan;14(3):267-273. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14744. Epub 2022 Nov 25.
2
Robot-assisted and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for thymoma: comparison of the perioperative outcomes using inverse probability of treatment weighting method.机器人辅助与电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗胸腺瘤:采用治疗权重逆概率法比较围手术期结局
Gland Surg. 2022 Aug;11(8):1287-1300. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-333.
3
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive thymectomy for myasthenia gravis with thymoma.
BMC Surg. 2024 Nov 20;24(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02661-3.
4
Subxiphoid Single-Port Robotic Thymectomy Using the Single-Port Robotic System versus VATS: A Multi-Institutional, Retrospective, and Propensity Score-Matched Study.使用单孔机器人系统与电视辅助胸腔镜手术进行剑突下单孔机器人胸腺切除术:一项多机构、回顾性和倾向评分匹配研究。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 15;16(16):2856. doi: 10.3390/cancers16162856.
机器人辅助微创胸腺切除术治疗重症肌无力合并胸腺瘤
JTCVS Tech. 2022 Apr 5;13:270-274. doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.02.036. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Robot-assisted thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for treatment of patients with thymoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助胸腔手术与电视辅助胸腔手术治疗胸腺瘤患者的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Thorac Cancer. 2022 Jan;13(2):151-161. doi: 10.1111/1759-7714.14234. Epub 2021 Nov 22.
5
Subxiphoid Versus Unilateral Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Thymectomy for Thymomas: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.剑突下与单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗胸腺瘤的倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Thorac Surg. 2022 May;113(5):1656-1662. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2021.05.011. Epub 2021 May 29.
6
Tubeless video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in mediastinal tumor resection.无管电视辅助胸腔镜手术在纵隔肿瘤切除中的应用
Gland Surg. 2021 Apr;10(4):1387-1396. doi: 10.21037/gs-20-682.
7
[Chinese guideline for clinical diagnosis and treatment of thymic epithelial tumors (2021 Edition)].《胸腺上皮肿瘤临床诊疗中国专家共识(2021年版)》
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2021 Apr 23;43(4):395-404. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20210313-00226.
8
Subxiphoid and subcostal thoracoscopic surgical approach for thymectomy.剑突下和肋缘下胸腔镜胸腺切除术手术入路
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):5239-5246. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08022-4. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
9
Robotic thymectomy for advanced thymic epithelial tumor: indications and technical aspects.晚期胸腺上皮肿瘤的机器人胸腺切除术:适应症与技术要点
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Feb;12(2):63-69. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.09.27.
10
The robotic thymectomy via the subxiphoid approach: technique and early outcomes.经剑突下入路的机器人胸腺切除术:技术与早期结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020 Aug 1;58(Suppl_1):i39-i43. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa006.