VA HSR&D Houston Center of Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Nov 25;14(12):693-702. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae050.
The FLOW program assists mental health providers in transitioning recovered and stabilized specialty mental health (SMH) patients to primary care to increase access to SMH care. In a recent cluster-randomized stepped-wedge trial, nine VA sites implemented the FLOW program with wide variation in implementation success. The goal of this study is to identify site-level factors associated with successful implementation of the FLOW program, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We used the Matrixed Multiple Case Study method, a mixed-methods approach, to compare key metrics hypothesized to impact implementation that were aligned with CFIR. Based upon the number of veterans transitioned at each site, we categorized two sites as higher implementation success, three as medium, and four as lower implementation success. Themes associated with more successful implementation included perceptions of the intervention itself (CFIR domain Innovation), having a culture of recovery-oriented care and prioritizing implementation over competing demands (CFIR domain Inner Setting), had lower mental health provider turnover, and had an internal facilitator who was well-positioned for FLOW implementation, such as having a leadership role or connections across several clinics (CFIR domain Characteristics of Individuals). Other variables, including staffing levels, leadership support, and organizational readiness to change did not have a consistent relationship to implementation success. These data may assist in identifying sites that are likely to need additional implementation support to succeed at implementing FLOW.
FLOW 项目协助精神健康服务提供者将已康复和稳定的专业精神健康(SMH)患者过渡到初级保健,以增加获得 SMH 护理的机会。在最近的一项集群随机分步试验中,9 个 VA 站点实施了 FLOW 项目,实施成功率存在很大差异。本研究的目的是确定与 FLOW 项目成功实施相关的站点级别因素,该项目由实施研究综合框架(CFIR)指导。我们使用矩阵多案例研究方法(一种混合方法方法),比较了与 CFIR 一致的、假设会影响实施的关键指标。根据每个站点转移的退伍军人人数,我们将两个站点归类为更高的实施成功率,三个站点归类为中等,四个站点归类为较低的实施成功率。与更成功实施相关的主题包括对干预本身的看法(CFIR 领域创新)、具有以康复为导向的护理文化,并将实施置于竞争需求之上(CFIR 领域内部环境)、心理健康服务提供者的离职率较低,并且有一个内部推动者,他们非常适合 FLOW 的实施,例如具有领导角色或与几个诊所的联系(CFIR 领域个人特征)。其他变量,包括人员配备水平、领导力支持和组织变革准备度,与实施成功率没有一致的关系。这些数据可能有助于确定需要额外实施支持才能成功实施 FLOW 的站点。