• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在退伍军人健康管理局区域网络中实施自我管理护理计划的预评估:一项混合方法研究的方案。

Preimplementation Evaluation of a Self-Directed Care Program in a Veterans Health Administration Regional Network: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

机构信息

South Florida Veteran Affairs Foundation for Research & Education, Miami, FL, United States.

Division of Epidemiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah Eccles School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jun 14;13:e57341. doi: 10.2196/57341.

DOI:10.2196/57341
PMID:38875003
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11214023/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Veteran-Directed Care (VDC) program serves to assist veterans at risk of long-term institutional care to remain at home by providing funding to hire veteran-selected caregivers. VDC is operated through partnerships between Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Centers (VAMCs) and third-party Aging and Disability Network Agency providers.

OBJECTIVE

We aim to identify facilitators, barriers, and adaptations in VDC implementation across 7 VAMCs in 1 region: Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) 8, which covers Florida, South Georgia, Puerto Rico, and the US Virgin Islands. We also attempted to understand leadership and stakeholder perspectives on VDC programs' reach and implementation and identify veterans served by VISN 8's VDC programs and describe their home- and community-based service use. Finally, we want to compare veterans served by VDC programs in VISN 8 to the veterans served in VDC programs across the VA. This information is intended to be used to identify strategies and propose recommendations to guide VDC program expansion in VISN 8.

METHODS

The mixed methods study design encompasses electronically delivered surveys, semistructured interviews, and administrative data. It is guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR version 2.0). Participants included the staff of VAMCs and partnering aging and disability network agencies across VISN 8, leadership at these VAMCs and VISN 8, veterans enrolled in VDC, and veterans who declined VDC enrollment and their caregivers. We interviewed selected VAMC site leaders in social work, Geriatrics and Extended Care, and the Caregiver Support Program. Each interviewee will be asked to complete a preinterview survey that includes information about their personal characteristics, experiences with the VDC program, and perceptions of program aspects according to the CFIR (version 2.0) framework. Participants will complete a semistructured interview that covers constructs relevant to the respondent and facilitators, barriers, and adaptations in VDC implementation at their site.

RESULTS

We will calculate descriptive statistics including means, SDs, and percentages for survey responses. Facilitators, barriers, number of patients enrolled, and staffing will also be presented. Interviews will be analyzed using rapid qualitative techniques guided by CFIR domains and constructs. Findings from VISN 8 will be collated to identify strategies for VDC expansion. We will use administrative data to describe veterans served by the programs in VISN 8.

CONCLUSIONS

The VA has prioritized VDC rollout nationwide and this study will inform these expansion efforts. The findings from this study will provide information about the experiences of the staff, leadership, veterans, and caregivers in the VDC program and identify program facilitators and barriers. These results may be used to improve program delivery, facilitate growth within VISN 8, and inform new program establishment at other sites nationwide as the VDC program expands.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/57341.

摘要

背景

退伍军人导向护理 (VDC) 计划通过向退伍军人选择的护理人员提供资金,帮助有长期机构护理风险的退伍军人留在家中,从而为退伍军人提供服务。VDC 通过退伍军人事务部 (VA) 医疗中心 (VAMC) 与第三方老年和残疾网络机构提供商之间的伙伴关系运作。

目的

我们旨在确定 7 个 VAMC 中 VDC 实施的促进因素、障碍和适应因素:退伍军人综合服务网络 (VISN) 8,涵盖佛罗里达州、南乔治亚州、波多黎各和美属维尔京群岛。我们还试图了解 VDC 项目的领导层和利益相关者对项目覆盖范围和实施情况的看法,并确定 VISN 8 中 VDC 项目服务的退伍军人,描述他们的家庭和社区服务使用情况。最后,我们希望将 VISN 8 中接受 VDC 项目服务的退伍军人与 VA 中接受 VDC 项目服务的退伍军人进行比较。这些信息旨在确定策略并提出建议,以指导 VISN 8 中 VDC 项目的扩展。

方法

混合方法研究设计包括电子交付的调查、半结构化访谈和行政数据。它由实施研究综合框架 (CFIR 版本 2.0) 指导。参与者包括 VISN 8 中退伍军人事务部和合作的老年和残疾网络机构的工作人员、这些 VAMC 和 VISN 8 的领导层、参加 VDC 的退伍军人以及拒绝参加 VDC 登记的退伍军人及其护理人员。我们采访了 VAMC 中社会工作、老年病学和长期护理以及护理人员支持计划的选定现场领导。每位受访者都将被要求完成一份预访谈调查,其中包括他们的个人特征、对 VDC 计划的经验以及根据 CFIR(版本 2.0)框架对计划方面的看法。参与者将完成半结构化访谈,涵盖与受访者以及 VDC 实施中的促进因素、障碍和适应因素相关的构建。

结果

我们将计算调查回复的描述性统计数据,包括平均值、标准差和百分比。还将介绍促进者、障碍、登记患者人数和人员配备情况。访谈将使用快速定性技术进行分析,这些技术由 CFIR 领域和结构指导。将整理 VISN 8 的调查结果,以确定 VDC 扩展的策略。我们将使用行政数据描述 VISN 8 中接受该计划服务的退伍军人。

结论

VA 已优先在全国范围内推出 VDC,并将根据这项研究进行扩展。这项研究的结果将提供有关 VDC 计划中工作人员、领导层、退伍军人和护理人员的经验信息,并确定计划的促进因素和障碍。这些结果可用于改进计划的交付,促进 VISN 8 内部的增长,并为全国其他地点的新计划建立提供信息,因为 VDC 计划正在扩大。

国际注册报告标识符 (IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/57341。

相似文献

1
Preimplementation Evaluation of a Self-Directed Care Program in a Veterans Health Administration Regional Network: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.在退伍军人健康管理局区域网络中实施自我管理护理计划的预评估:一项混合方法研究的方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Jun 14;13:e57341. doi: 10.2196/57341.
2
Interorganizational Context When Implementing Multisector Partnered Programs: A Qualitative Analysis of Veteran Directed Care.实施多部门伙伴关系计划的组织间背景:退伍军人导向护理的定性分析。
J Gerontol Soc Work. 2020 Nov-Dec;63(8):822-836. doi: 10.1080/01634372.2020.1817828. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
3
Improving Uptake of a National Web-Based Psychoeducational Workshop for Informal Caregivers of Veterans: Mixed Methods Implementation Evaluation.提高退伍军人非正式照护者参与国家网络心理教育工作坊的人数:混合方法实施评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 7;23(1):e16495. doi: 10.2196/16495.
4
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of VA home-based primary care on American Indian reservations: a qualitative multi-case study.美国印第安人保留地实施 VA 家庭初级保健的障碍和促进因素:一项定性多案例研究。
Implement Sci. 2017 Sep 2;12(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0632-6.
5
Determinants of inter-organizational implementation success: A mixed-methods evaluation of Veteran Directed Care.组织间实施成功的决定因素:对退伍军人导向护理的混合方法评估。
Healthc (Amst). 2022 Dec;10(4):100653. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2022.100653. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
6
Multisite Agricultural Veterans Affairs Farming and Recovery Mental Health Services (VA FARMS) Pilot Program: Protocol for a Responsive Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.多地点退伍军人事务部农业与康复心理健康服务(VA FARMS)试点项目:一项响应式混合方法评估研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jan 6;12:e40496. doi: 10.2196/40496.
7
Participation of Veterans Affairs Medical Centers in veteran-centric community-based service navigation networks: A mixed methods study.退伍军人事务医疗中心参与以退伍军人为中心的社区服务导航网络:一项混合方法研究。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun;59(3):e14286. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14286. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
8
9
Interagency partnership to deliver Veteran-Directed Home and Community-Based Services: Interviews with Aging and Disability Network agency personnel regarding their experience with partner Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers.提供退伍军人主导的家庭和社区服务的跨部门伙伴关系:就老龄化和残疾网络机构人员与退伍军人事务部医疗中心合作伙伴的合作经历进行访谈。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53(5):611-618. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2015.02.0019.
10
TeleWound Practice Within the Veterans Health Administration: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Program Evaluation.退伍军人健康管理局内的远程伤口护理实践:混合方法项目评估方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Jul 20;9(7):e20139. doi: 10.2196/20139.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring the unmet needs of American military Veterans and their caregivers: Survey protocol of the HERO CARE survey.衡量美国退伍军人及其护理人员未得到满足的需求:英雄关怀调查的调查方案
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Dec;71(12):3814-3825. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18577. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
2
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
3
Determinants of inter-organizational implementation success: A mixed-methods evaluation of Veteran Directed Care.组织间实施成功的决定因素:对退伍军人导向护理的混合方法评估。
Healthc (Amst). 2022 Dec;10(4):100653. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2022.100653. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
4
Fewer potentially avoidable health care events in rural veterans with self-directed care versus other personal care services.与其他个人护理服务相比,农村退伍军人中自我管理护理的潜在可避免医疗保健事件更少。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 May;70(5):1418-1428. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17656. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
5
Dementia Family Caregiving in Rural Appalachia: A Sociocultural Model of Care Decisions and Service Use.农村阿巴拉契亚的痴呆症家庭护理:护理决策和服务使用的社会文化模型。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Jun 1;77(6):1094-1104. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab236.
6
Early-Life War Exposure and Later-Life Frailty Among Older Adults in Vietnam: Does War Hasten Aging?越南老年人早年战争经历与晚年虚弱:战争是否加速衰老?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2022 Sep 1;77(9):1674-1685. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab190.
7
Applied Rapid Qualitative Analysis to Develop a Contextually Appropriate Intervention and Increase the Likelihood of Uptake.应用快速定性分析来制定一个具有文化适应性的干预措施,从而提高采用的可能性。
Med Care. 2021 Jun 1;59(Suppl 3):S242-S251. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001553.
8
Rapid Techniques in Qualitative Research: A Critical Review of the Literature.快速定性研究技术:文献综述的批判性评价。
Qual Health Res. 2020 Aug;30(10):1596-1604. doi: 10.1177/1049732320921835.
9
Users Of Veteran-Directed Care And Other Purchased Care Have Similar Hospital Use And Costs Over Time. Veterans 导向护理和其他购买护理的用户在一段时间内具有相似的住院使用和费用。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Jun;38(6):1037-1045. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00020.
10
Long-Term Services and Supports Use Among Older Medicare Beneficiaries in Rural and Urban Areas.农村和城市地区老年 Medicare 受益人的长期服务和支持使用情况。
Res Aging. 2019 Mar;41(3):241-264. doi: 10.1177/0164027518824117. Epub 2019 Jan 13.