Department of Endodontics, College of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Egypt.
Eur Endod J. 2022 Mar;7(1):40-46. doi: 10.14744/eej.2021.44366.
The aim of the study was to examine the efficacy and debris extrusion of XP -Endo Finisher and XP-Endo Finisher R when used in the removal of root canal filling as supplementary files.
Sixty single-rooted mandibular premolars with single canals were selected. After root canal preparation and obturation, roots were distributed across four groups according to the method of retreatment (n=15): H files, D Race files, D Race +XP-Endo Finisher and D Race+ XP -Endo Finisher R. After retreatment completion, the debris was dried in a hot air oven and weighed. Later, the coronal, middle and apical thirds were assessed using the stereomicroscope. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test was used to compare across all tested groups. The significance level was set at 0.05 (P<0.05).
XP- Endo Finisher R exhibited significantly cleaner root canals than XP- Endo Finisher (41.58±10.56 and 52.68±9.94 respectively) and extruded more debris apically (16.56%±4.07 and 12.82%±3.41 respectively) (P<0.001).
Although none of the tested approaches rendered root canals free of filling remnants, the XP-Endo Finisher R cleaned canals significantly more than the XP-Endo Finisher and extruded more debris apically.
本研究旨在考察 XP-Endo Finisher 和 XP-Endo Finisher R 作为根管充填的辅助工具在根管清理中的效果和碎屑挤出情况。
选择 60 颗下颌单根前磨牙,均为单根管。根管预备和充填后,根据再治疗方法(n=15)将牙根分为四组:H 锉、D 型锉、D 型锉+XP-Endo Finisher 和 D 型锉+XP-Endo Finisher R。再治疗完成后,将碎屑在热空气烤箱中干燥并称重。然后,使用立体显微镜评估根管的冠、中、根尖三分之一段。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA),随后进行 Tukey 事后检验,比较所有测试组之间的差异。显著性水平设为 0.05(P<0.05)。
与 XP-Endo Finisher 相比,XP-Endo Finisher R 显示出明显更清洁的根管(分别为 41.58±10.56 和 52.68±9.94),并在根尖处挤出更多的碎屑(分别为 16.56%±4.07 和 12.82%±3.41)(P<0.001)。
尽管没有一种测试方法能使根管内完全无残留填充物,但 XP-Endo Finisher R 比 XP-Endo Finisher 更能有效地清洁根管,并在根尖处挤出更多的碎屑。