Suppr超能文献

通过多次静脉推注拉贝洛尔治疗重度高血压。

Treatment of severe hypertension by repeated bolus injections of labetalol.

作者信息

Cumming A M, Brown J J, Lever A F, Mackay A, Robertson J I

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1979;8(Suppl 2):199S-204S.

Abstract

Repeated intravenous bolus injections of labetalol were administered to 15 severely hypertensive patients. In 11 instances, a standard protocol was followed in which a loading dose of 1 mg/kg was given intravenously over 1 min, followed by up to five bolus injections of 50 mg at 10-min intervals. In two further patients, bolus doses varying from 25-100 mg were given after the loading dose, and in two others the loading dose was omitted. Falls in systolic BP ranging from 26-194 mmHg were seen in 14 patients and of diastolic BP from 16-76 mmHg in 13. In one patient there was no appreciable fall in either systolic or diastolic BP and in one no marked fall in diastolic BP, although systolic BP dropped by 42 mmHg. The reduction in arterial BP was smooth in ten patients. In four patients a steep fall in BP, of 194 to 101 mmHg systolic, was seen within 10 min of an injection of labetalol; in all four hypotension was readily controlled by elevating the foot of the bed. Side-effects included nausea, vomiting, epigastric discomfort, scalp tingling, burning sensations in the throat and groin, shivering, and pain at the site of injection. Side-effects limited the dose given in four patients. In no case was there clinical or electrocardiographic evidence of myocardial ischaemia induced by labetalol. Labetalol, given by bolus injection, appeared less efficient in controlling arterial pressure, and more likely to cause side-effects, than when given, as in a previous study, by incremental infusion. When labetalol is to be given intravenously for the control of severe hypertension, incremental infusion, rather than bolus injection, is preferred.

摘要

对15例重度高血压患者进行了多次静脉推注拉贝洛尔治疗。11例患者遵循标准方案,即先在1分钟内静脉注射1mg/kg的负荷剂量,随后每隔10分钟最多推注50mg,共推注5次。另外2例患者在负荷剂量后给予25 - 100mg不等的推注剂量,还有2例患者未给予负荷剂量。14例患者收缩压下降幅度为26 - 194mmHg,13例患者舒张压下降幅度为16 - 76mmHg。1例患者收缩压和舒张压均无明显下降,另1例患者舒张压无明显下降,但收缩压下降了42mmHg。10例患者动脉血压下降平稳。4例患者在注射拉贝洛尔后10分钟内收缩压从194mmHg急剧降至101mmHg;这4例患者通过抬高床脚均能轻松控制低血压。副作用包括恶心、呕吐、上腹部不适、头皮刺痛、咽喉和腹股沟烧灼感、寒战以及注射部位疼痛。副作用限制了4例患者的给药剂量。在任何情况下,均无拉贝洛尔诱发心肌缺血的临床或心电图证据。与之前一项研究中采用递增输注给药相比,静脉推注拉贝洛尔在控制动脉压方面似乎效果较差,且更易引起副作用。当需要静脉注射拉贝洛尔来控制重度高血压时,首选递增输注而非推注。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Intravenous labetalol in severe hypertension.重度高血压的静脉注射拉贝洛尔治疗
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1982 Jun;13(1 Suppl):97S-99S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1982.tb01896.x.
5
6
Comparison of labetalol with other anti-hypertensive drugs.拉贝洛尔与其他抗高血压药物的比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1982 Jun;13(1 Suppl):41S-47S. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1982.tb01888.x.

本文引用的文献

3
Ischaemic heart disease in young women.年轻女性的缺血性心脏病
Br Med J. 1974 Nov 2;4(5939):253-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.4.5939.253.
8

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验