Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Lawrence Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada.
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada.
Curr Oncol. 2024 Sep 14;31(9):5484-5497. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31090406.
Complex malignant hematology (CMH) shared-care programs have been established to support patients with access to care closer to home. This integrative review examined what is known about CMH shared-care using the RE-AIM evaluation framework. We searched five electronic databases for articles published until 16 January 2024. Articles were included if they were qualitative or quantitative studies, reviews or discussion papers, and reported on an experience with shared-care (defined as a reciprocal, ongoing patient-sharing relationship between a specialist centre and community hospital) for patients with hematological malignancies, and examined one or more aspects of the RE-AIM framework. The search yielded 6523 articles; 10 articles describing eight shared-care experiences. Indicators of reach were reported for 65% of the programs, and emphasized some patient eligibility criteria. Effectiveness indicators were reported for 28% of programs, and suggested favourable survival outcomes within a shared-care model; however, health system impact and quality of life studies were lacking. Indicators of adoption and implementation were reported for 56% and 42% of programs, respectively, and emphasized multidisciplinary teams, infrastructure support, and communication strategies. Maintenance was not reported. Common elements contribute to the implementation of existing CMH shared-care programs; however, a formal evaluation remains an area of need.
建立复杂恶性血液病(CMH)共同照护计划是为了支持患者在离家更近的地方获得医疗服务。本综合评价使用 RE-AIM 评估框架,考察了 CMH 共同照护的已知内容。我们在五个电子数据库中搜索了截至 2024 年 1 月 16 日发表的文章。如果文章是定性或定量研究、综述或讨论文件,并且报告了血液恶性肿瘤患者的共同照护(定义为专科中心和社区医院之间互惠、持续的患者共享关系)经验,以及考察了 RE-AIM 框架的一个或多个方面,则纳入研究。检索结果得到 6523 篇文章;其中 10 篇文章描述了 8 种共同照护经验。65%的项目报告了可达性指标,并强调了一些患者的入选标准。28%的项目报告了有效性指标,表明在共同照护模式下有较好的生存结果;然而,缺乏卫生系统影响和生活质量研究。56%和 42%的项目分别报告了采用和实施指标,强调了多学科团队、基础设施支持和沟通策略。维护情况未报告。共同要素有助于现有 CMH 共同照护计划的实施;然而,正式评估仍是一个需求领域。