• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消耗患者的时间:癌症患者门诊预约所花费的时间

Consuming Patients' Days: Time Spent on Ambulatory Appointments by People With Cancer.

作者信息

Kagalwalla Sana, Tsai Alexander K, George Manju, Waldock Anna, Davis Sydney, Jewett Patricia, Vogel Rachel I, Ganguli Ishani, Booth Christopher, Dusetzina Stacie B, Rocque Gabrielle B, Blaes Anne H, Gupta Arjun

机构信息

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Paltown Development Foundation/COLONTOWN, Crownsville, MD, USA.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2024 May 3;29(5):400-406. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae016.

DOI:10.1093/oncolo/oyae016
PMID:38339991
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11067814/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In qualitative work, patients report that seemingly short trips to clinic (eg, a supposed 10-minute blood draw) often turn into "all-day affairs." We sought to quantify the time patients with cancer spend attending ambulatory appointments.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients scheduled for oncology-related ambulatory care (eg, labs, imaging, procedures, infusions, and clinician visits) at an academic cancer center over 1 week. The primary exposure was the ambulatory service type(s) (eg, clinician visit only, labs and infusion, etc.). We used Real-Time Location System badge data to calculate clinic times and estimated round-trip travel times and parking times. We calculated and summarized clinic and total (clinic + travel + parking) times for ambulatory service types.

RESULTS

We included 435 patients. Across all service day type(s), the median (IQR) clinic time was 119 (78-202) minutes. The estimated median (IQR) round-trip driving distance and travel time was 34 (17-49) miles and 50 (36-68) minutes. The median (IQR) parking time was 14 (12-15) minutes. Overall, the median (IQR) total time was 197 (143-287) minutes. The median total times for specific service type(s) included: 99 minutes for lab-only, 144 minutes for clinician visit only, and 278 minutes for labs, clinician visit, and infusion.

CONCLUSION

Patients often spent several hours pursuing ambulatory cancer care on a given day. Accounting for opportunity time costs and the coordination of activities around ambulatory care, these results highlight the substantial time burdens of cancer care, and support the notion that many days with ambulatory health care contact may represent "lost days."

摘要

背景

在定性研究中,患者报告称,看似短暂的门诊之行(例如,一次预计10分钟的采血)往往会变成“耗时一整天的事情”。我们试图量化癌症患者在门诊预约就诊时所花费的时间。

方法

我们对某学术癌症中心一周内安排进行肿瘤相关门诊护理(例如,实验室检查、影像检查、手术、输液以及临床医生问诊)的患者进行了一项回顾性研究。主要暴露因素是门诊服务类型(例如,仅临床医生问诊、实验室检查和输液等)。我们使用实时定位系统徽章数据来计算门诊时间,并估算往返行程时间和停车时间。我们计算并总结了不同门诊服务类型的门诊时间和总时间(门诊时间 + 行程时间 + 停车时间)。

结果

我们纳入了435名患者。在所有服务日类型中,门诊时间的中位数(四分位间距)为119(78 - 202)分钟。估算的往返驾车距离和行程时间的中位数(四分位间距)分别为34(17 - 49)英里和50(36 - 68)分钟。停车时间的中位数(四分位间距)为14(12 - 15)分钟。总体而言,总时间的中位数(四分位间距)为197(143 - 287)分钟。特定服务类型的总时间中位数包括:仅实验室检查为99分钟,仅临床医生问诊为144分钟,实验室检查、临床医生问诊和输液为278分钟。

结论

患者在某一天进行门诊癌症护理通常要花费数小时。考虑到机会时间成本以及围绕门诊护理的活动协调,这些结果凸显了癌症护理的巨大时间负担,并支持了这样一种观点,即许多有门诊医疗接触的日子可能意味着“损失的日子”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11067814/91cd379928ad/oyae016_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11067814/b795d46c9fdd/oyae016_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11067814/91cd379928ad/oyae016_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11067814/b795d46c9fdd/oyae016_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d42/11067814/91cd379928ad/oyae016_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Consuming Patients' Days: Time Spent on Ambulatory Appointments by People With Cancer.消耗患者的时间:癌症患者门诊预约所花费的时间
Oncologist. 2024 May 3;29(5):400-406. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae016.
2
Effects of managed care on the length of time that elderly patients spend with physicians during ambulatory visits: National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.管理式医疗对老年患者门诊就诊时与医生相处时间的影响:国家门诊医疗调查
Med Care. 2002 Jul;40(7):606-13. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200207000-00007.
3
Value stream mapping to characterize value and waste associated with accessing HIV care in South Africa.价值流映射分析南非获取艾滋病毒护理服务的价值和浪费情况。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 24;13(7):e0201032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201032. eCollection 2018.
4
5
Do Orthopaedic Virtual Clinic Visits Demonstrate Cost and Time Efficiencies Compared With In-person Visits?骨科虚拟诊所就诊是否比亲自就诊更具成本和时间效率?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Nov 1;481(11):2080-2090. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002813. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
6
Transportation cost of anticoagulation clinic visits in an urban setting.城市环境中抗凝门诊就诊的交通成本。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Oct;17(8):635-40. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.8.635.
7
Health Care Contact Days Among Older Cancer Survivors.老年癌症幸存者的医疗保健接触天数。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2024 Jul;20(7):943-952. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00590. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
8
The feasibility, time savings and economic impact of a designated time appointment system at a busy HIV care clinic in Kenya: a randomized controlled trial.肯尼亚一家繁忙的艾滋病毒护理诊所采用指定时间预约系统的可行性、时间节省情况及经济影响:一项随机对照试验
J Int AIDS Soc. 2015 Jul 9;18(1):19876. doi: 10.7448/IAS.18.1.19876. eCollection 2015.
9
Behind the clock: elucidating factors contributing to longer clinic appointment duration and patient wait time.时钟背后:阐明导致门诊预约时间延长和患者等待时间延长的因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 26;21(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06079-y.
10
Nonprice barriers to ambulatory care after an emergency department visit.急诊就诊后门诊护理的非价格障碍。
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 May;51(5):607-13. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.10.027.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating mHealth Innovations into Decentralized Oncology Trials.将移动健康创新融入去中心化肿瘤学试验。
J Med Syst. 2025 Aug 8;49(1):103. doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02233-9.
2
Applying the unattainable triangle in cardio-oncology care: Balancing cost, quality, and time.在心脏肿瘤学护理中应用难以实现的三角关系:平衡成本、质量和时间。
Oncotarget. 2025 Jun 4;16:419-424. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.28738.
3
Health Care Contact Days and Outcomes in Clinical Trials vs Routine Care Among Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.非小细胞肺癌患者临床试验与常规护理中的医疗接触天数及结果

本文引用的文献

1
Management of malignant bowel obstruction.恶性肠梗阻的管理
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Jan;9(1):14-15. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00333-3.
2
Trajectory of Healthcare Contact Days for Veterans With Advanced Gastrointestinal Malignancy.晚期胃肠道恶性肿瘤退伍军人的医疗接触天数轨迹。
Oncologist. 2024 Feb 2;29(2):e290-e293. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyad313.
3
Health Care Contact Days Experienced by Decedents With Advanced GI Cancer.晚期胃肠道癌症患者的临终关怀接触天数。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255033. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5033.
4
"The biggest challenge is there's never a routine": a qualitative study of the time burdens of cancer care at home.“最大的挑战在于没有常规可言”:一项关于居家癌症护理时间负担的定性研究
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jan 27;33(2):80. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-09132-8.
5
Defining benefit: Clinically and biologically meaningful outcomes in the next-generation Alzheimer's disease clinical care pathway.定义获益:下一代阿尔茨海默病临床护理路径中具有临床和生物学意义的结果。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Feb;21(2):e14425. doi: 10.1002/alz.14425. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
6
Time's up: the urgency to investigate time toxicity in patients with genitourinary malignancies.时间到了:研究泌尿生殖系统恶性肿瘤患者时间毒性的紧迫性。
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Dec 11;16:17588359241305088. doi: 10.1177/17588359241305088. eCollection 2024.
7
Time toxicity in cancer care: A concept analysis using Walker and Avant's method.癌症护理中的时间毒性:运用沃克和阿凡特方法的概念分析
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2024 Oct 23;11(12):100610. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100610. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Patient, Caregiver, and Clinician Perspectives on the Time Burdens of Cancer Care.患者、照护者和临床医生对癌症护理时间负担的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2447649. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.47649.
9
Shared-Care in Complex Malignant Hematology: An Integrative Review Using the RE-AIM Evaluation Framework.复杂恶性血液病的共同照护:使用 RE-AIM 评价框架的综合评价。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Sep 14;31(9):5484-5497. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31090406.
10
How Racialized Approaches to Opioid Use Disorder and Opioid Misuse Management Hamper Pharmacoequity for Cancer Pain.针对阿片类药物使用障碍和阿片类药物滥用管理的种族化方法如何阻碍癌症疼痛的药物公平性。
J Clin Oncol. 2025 Jan;43(1):10-14. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00705. Epub 2024 Sep 17.
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Nov;19(11):1031-1038. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00232. Epub 2023 Sep 22.
4
Changes in Health Care Costs, Survival, and Time Toxicity in the Era of Immunotherapy and Targeted Systemic Therapy for Melanoma.免疫治疗和靶向系统治疗时代黑色素瘤的医疗费用变化、生存和时间毒性。
JAMA Dermatol. 2023 Nov 1;159(11):1195-1204. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.3179.
5
Surgical versus non-surgical management for patients with malignant bowel obstruction (S1316): a pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial.手术与非手术治疗恶性肠梗阻患者的比较(S1316):一项实用的比较有效性试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Oct;8(10):908-918. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00191-7. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
6
Patient navigation across the cancer care continuum: An overview of systematic reviews and emerging literature.癌症诊疗全程中的患者导航:系统评价和新兴文献概述。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Nov-Dec;73(6):565-589. doi: 10.3322/caac.21788. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
7
Evaluating the Time Toxicity of Cancer Treatment in the CCTG CO.17 Trial.评估 CCTG CO.17 试验中癌症治疗的时间毒性。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Jun;19(6):e859-e866. doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00737. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
8
The unequal burden of time toxicity.时间毒性的不平等负担。
Trends Cancer. 2023 May;9(5):373-375. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2023.01.006. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
9
Estimated Indirect Cost Savings of Using Telehealth Among Nonelderly Patients With Cancer.估算使用远程医疗为非老年癌症患者节省的间接成本。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jan 3;6(1):e2250211. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.50211.
10
The least costly pharmacy for cancer supportive care medications over time: the logistic toxicity of playing catch up.随着时间的推移,癌症支持性护理药物最经济的药房:迎头赶上的逻辑毒性。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Dec 13;31(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07472-x.