• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于异构数据和群体决策的城市洪水韧性评估

Urban Flood Resilience Evaluation Based on Heterogeneous Data and Group Decision-Making.

作者信息

He Xiang, Hu Yanzhu, Yang Xiaojun, Wang Song, Wang Yingjian

机构信息

School of Intelligent Engineering and Automation, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China.

Unit 63892 of PLA, Luoyang 471000, China.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2024 Sep 3;26(9):755. doi: 10.3390/e26090755.

DOI:10.3390/e26090755
PMID:39330088
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11431791/
Abstract

In recent years, urban floods have occurred frequently in China. Therefore, there is an urgent need to strengthen urban flood resilience. This paper proposed a hybrid multi-criteria group decision-making method to assess urban flood resilience based on heterogeneous data, group decision-making methodologies, the pressure-state-response model, and social-economic-natural complex ecosystem theory (PSR-SENCE model). A qualitative and quantitative indicator system is formulated using the PSR-SENCE model. Additionally, a new weighting method for indicators, called the synthesis weighting-group analytic hierarchy process (SW-GAHP), is proposed by considering both intrapersonal consistency and interpersonal consistency of decision-makers. Furthermore, an extensional group decision-making technology (EGDMT) based on heterogeneous data is proposed to evaluate qualitative indicators. The flexible parameterized mapping function (FPMF) is introduced for the evaluation of quantitative indicators. The normal cloud model is employed to handle various uncertainties associated with heterogeneous data. The evaluations for Beijing from 2017 to 2021 reveal a consistent annual improvement in urban flood resilience, with a 14.1% increase. Subsequently, optimization recommendations are presented not only for favorable indicators such as regional economic status, drainability, and public transportation service capacity but also for unfavorable indicators like flood risk and population density. This provides a theoretical foundation and a guide for making decisions about the improvement of urban flood resilience. Finally, our proposed method shows superiority and robustness through comparative and sensitivity analyses.

摘要

近年来,中国城市内涝频发。因此,迫切需要增强城市防洪韧性。本文提出了一种基于异构数据、群体决策方法、压力-状态-响应模型和社会-经济-自然复合生态系统理论(PSR-SENCE模型)的混合多准则群体决策方法来评估城市防洪韧性。利用PSR-SENCE模型构建了定性和定量指标体系。此外,通过兼顾决策者的个人一致性和人际一致性,提出了一种新的指标加权方法,即综合加权-群体层次分析法(SW-GAHP)。进一步提出了基于异构数据的可拓群体决策技术(EGDMT)来评估定性指标。引入灵活参数化映射函数(FPMF)来评估定量指标。采用正态云模型处理与异构数据相关的各种不确定性。对北京2017年至2021年的评估结果显示,城市防洪韧性逐年稳步提升,增幅为14.1%。随后,针对区域经济状况、排水能力和公共交通服务能力等有利指标以及洪水风险和人口密度等不利指标提出了优化建议。这为城市防洪韧性提升决策提供了理论基础和指导。最后,通过比较分析和敏感性分析,验证了本文所提方法的优越性和稳健性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/ed0c333053d6/entropy-26-00755-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/2c0f7345017a/entropy-26-00755-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/cd76cdb8eada/entropy-26-00755-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/0eb616b2bb6e/entropy-26-00755-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/6285cdcb9c35/entropy-26-00755-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/6b59802f469e/entropy-26-00755-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/bd924add1019/entropy-26-00755-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/2230c53b4826/entropy-26-00755-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/596572c9449d/entropy-26-00755-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/ed0c333053d6/entropy-26-00755-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/2c0f7345017a/entropy-26-00755-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/cd76cdb8eada/entropy-26-00755-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/0eb616b2bb6e/entropy-26-00755-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/6285cdcb9c35/entropy-26-00755-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/6b59802f469e/entropy-26-00755-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/bd924add1019/entropy-26-00755-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/2230c53b4826/entropy-26-00755-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/596572c9449d/entropy-26-00755-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8d4/11431791/ed0c333053d6/entropy-26-00755-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
Urban Flood Resilience Evaluation Based on Heterogeneous Data and Group Decision-Making.基于异构数据和群体决策的城市洪水韧性评估
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Sep 3;26(9):755. doi: 10.3390/e26090755.
2
Urban flood resilience assessment using RAGA-PP and KL-TOPSIS model based on PSR framework: A case study of Jiangsu province, China.基于 PSR 框架的 RAGA-PP 和 KL-TOPSIS 模型在城市洪水韧性评估中的应用:以中国江苏省为例。
Water Sci Technol. 2022 Dec;86(12):3264-3280. doi: 10.2166/wst.2022.404.
3
A resilience-based robustness evaluation framework for sustainable urban flood management under uncertainty.基于韧性的不确定性下可持续城市洪水管理稳健性评价框架。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(60):126195-126213. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30804-1. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
4
A hybrid method for evaluating the resilience of urban road traffic network under flood disaster: An example of Nanjing, China.一种评估城市道路交通网络在洪灾下的弹性的混合方法:以中国南京为例。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jun;29(30):46306-46324. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19142-w. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
5
A research on urban disaster resilience assessment system for rainstorm and flood disasters: A case study of Beijing.关于暴雨和洪涝灾害的城市灾害恢复力评估系统的研究:以北京市为例。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 26;18(10):e0291674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291674. eCollection 2023.
6
Assessment of urban flood resilience based on the socio-ecological composite index model: a case study in Wuhua District, Kunming City, China.基于社会-生态复合指数模型的城市洪水韧性评估:以中国昆明市五华区为例。
Water Sci Technol. 2024 Jan;89(2):252-270. doi: 10.2166/wst.2023.413.
7
Urban flooding resilience evaluation with coupled rainfall and flooding models: a small area in Kunming City, China as an example.基于耦合降雨和洪水模型的城市洪水韧性评估:以中国昆明市的一个小区域为例。
Water Sci Technol. 2023 Jun;87(11):2820-2839. doi: 10.2166/wst.2023.149.
8
A study on dynamic simulation and improvement strategies of flood resilience for urban road system.城市道路系统洪水韧性动态模拟与提升策略研究
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 15;344:118770. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118770. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
9
Quantitative flood disaster loss-resilience with the multilevel hybrid evaluation model.基于多层次混合评价模型的量化洪灾损失韧性评估
J Environ Manage. 2023 Dec 1;347:119026. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119026. Epub 2023 Oct 8.
10
Evaluating the response and adaptation of urban stormwater systems to changed rainfall with the CMIP6 projections.评估城市雨水系统对 CMIP6 预测变化的降雨的响应和适应。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Dec 1;347:119135. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119135. Epub 2023 Oct 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring spatial heterogeneity and environmental injustices in exposure to flood hazards using geographically weighted regression.利用地理加权回归探索洪水灾害暴露的空间异质性和环境不公平。
Environ Res. 2022 Jul;210:112982. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112982. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
2
Assessing the Relationship Between Social Vulnerability and Community Resilience to Hazards.评估社会脆弱性与社区灾害恢复力之间的关系。
Soc Indic Res. 2015 Jun;122(2):391-409. doi: 10.1007/s11205-014-0698-3. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
3
Getting actionable about community resilience: the Los Angeles County Community Disaster Resilience project.
着手提升社区韧性:洛杉矶县社区灾害韧性项目。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jul;103(7):1181-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301270. Epub 2013 May 16.
4
Developing the evidence base for mainstreaming adaptation of stormwater systems to climate change.为将雨水系统适应气候变化纳入主流开发证据基础。
Water Res. 2012 Dec 15;46(20):6824-35. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.03.060. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
5
The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work.复原力的概念:批判性评估及未来工作指南。
Child Dev. 2000 May-Jun;71(3):543-62. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00164.