• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用地理加权回归探索洪水灾害暴露的空间异质性和环境不公平。

Exploring spatial heterogeneity and environmental injustices in exposure to flood hazards using geographically weighted regression.

机构信息

Department of Geography and Environmental Management, Faculty of Environment, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada.

Department of Economics and Political Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada.

出版信息

Environ Res. 2022 Jul;210:112982. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112982. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2022.112982
PMID:35218710
Abstract

This study explores flood-related environmental injustices by deconstructing racial, ethnic, and socio-demographic disparities and spatial heterogeneity in the areal extent of fluvial, pluvial, and coastal flooding across Canada. The study integrates JBA Risk Management's 100-year Canada Flood Map with the 2016 national census-based socioeconomic data to investigate whether traditionally recognized vulnerable groups and communities are exposed inequitably to inland (e.g., fluvial and pluvial) and coastal flood hazards. Social vulnerability was represented by neighbourhood-level socioeconomic deprivation, including economic insecurity and instability indices. Statistical analyses include bivariate correlation and a series of non-spatial and spatial regression techniques, including ordinary least squares, binary logistic regression, and simultaneous autoregressive models. The study emphasizes the quest for the most appropriate methodological framework to analyze flood-related socioeconomic inequities in Canada. Strong evidence of spatial effects has motivated the study to test for the spatial heterogeneity of covariates by employing geographically weighted regression (GWR) on continuous outcome variables (e.g., percent of residential properties in a census tract exposed to flood hazards) and geographically weighted logistic regression on dichotomous outcome variables (e.g., a census tract in or out of flood hazard zone). GWR results show that the direction and statistical significance of relationships between inland flood exposure and all explanatory variables under consideration are spatially non-stationary. We find certain vulnerable groups, such as females, lone-parent households, Indigenous peoples, South Asians, the elderly, other visible minorities, and economically insecure residents, are at a higher risk of flooding in Canadian neighbourhoods. Spatial and social disparities in flood exposure have critical policy implications for effective emergency management and disaster risk reduction. The study findings are a foundation for a more detailed investigation of the disproportionate impacts of flood risk in Canada.

摘要

本研究通过解构加拿大河流、暴雨和沿海洪水泛滥面积的种族、族裔和社会人口差异以及空间异质性,探讨了与洪水有关的环境不公正问题。该研究将 JBA Risk Management 的 100 年加拿大洪水图与基于 2016 年全国人口普查的社会经济数据相结合,调查传统上认为的弱势群体和社区是否面临内陆(如河流和暴雨)和沿海洪水灾害的不公平暴露。社会脆弱性由邻里层面的社会经济剥夺来表示,包括经济不安全和不稳定指数。统计分析包括双变量相关分析以及一系列非空间和空间回归技术,包括普通最小二乘法、二元逻辑回归和自回归模型。本研究强调寻求最合适的方法框架来分析加拿大与洪水相关的社会经济不平等问题。空间效应的有力证据促使该研究通过地理加权回归(GWR)检验连续因变量(例如,普查区内暴露于洪水危险的住宅物业的百分比)和二分类因变量(例如,普查区内是否处于洪水危险区)的协变量的空间异质性。GWR 结果表明,内陆洪水暴露与所有考虑中的解释变量之间的关系的方向和统计显著性在空间上是非稳定的。我们发现,某些弱势群体,如女性、单亲家庭、土著人民、南亚人、老年人、其他可见少数民族和经济不安全的居民,在加拿大社区面临更高的洪水风险。洪水暴露的空间和社会差异对有效的应急管理和减少灾害风险具有重要的政策意义。本研究的发现为更详细地调查加拿大洪水风险的不成比例影响奠定了基础。

相似文献

1
Exploring spatial heterogeneity and environmental injustices in exposure to flood hazards using geographically weighted regression.利用地理加权回归探索洪水灾害暴露的空间异质性和环境不公平。
Environ Res. 2022 Jul;210:112982. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.112982. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
2
Environmental injustice and Hurricane Harvey: A household-level study of socially disparate flood exposures in Greater Houston, Texas, USA.环境不公与哈维飓风:美国德克萨斯州休斯敦大都市区社会差异洪水暴露的家庭层面研究。
Environ Res. 2019 Dec;179(Pt A):108772. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.108772. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
3
Assessing social vulnerability and identifying spatial hotspots of flood risk to inform socially just flood management policy.评估社会脆弱性并识别洪水风险的空间热点,以为社会公平的洪水管理政策提供信息。
Risk Anal. 2023 May;43(5):1058-1078. doi: 10.1111/risa.13978. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
4
Investigating the association between floods and low birth weight in India: Using the geospatial approach.调查印度洪水与低出生体重之间的关联:使用地理空间方法。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Feb 20;912:169593. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169593. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
5
Predicting flood insurance claims with hydrologic and socioeconomic demographics via machine learning: Exploring the roles of topography, minority populations, and political dissimilarity.通过机器学习预测洪水保险索赔:探讨地形、少数族裔人口和政治差异的作用。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Oct 15;272:111051. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111051. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
6
Disparities of population exposed to flood hazards in the United States.美国暴露于洪水灾害风险人口的差异。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Feb 15;232:295-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.039. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
7
Shifting landscapes of risk: Quantifying pluvial flood vulnerability beyond the regulated floodplain.风险景观的转变:量化管制洪泛区之外的雨洪脆弱性。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Feb 15;304:114221. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114221. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
8
Local spatial variations analysis of smear-positive tuberculosis in Xinjiang using Geographically Weighted Regression model.基于地理加权回归模型的新疆涂阳肺结核局部空间变异分析
BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 6;16(1):1058. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3723-4.
9
Exposure to Flood Hazards in Miami and Houston: Are Hispanic Immigrants at Greater Risk than Other Social Groups?迈阿密和休斯顿的洪水灾害暴露情况:西班牙裔移民面临的风险是否高于其他社会群体?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2016 Aug 1;13(8):775. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13080775.
10
Geographically varying associations between mentally unhealthy days and social vulnerability in the USA.美国心理健康状况不佳天数与社会脆弱性的地域差异关联。
Public Health. 2023 Sep;222:13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.06.033. Epub 2023 Jul 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing and correcting neighborhood socioeconomic spatial sampling biases in citizen science mosquito data collection.评估和纠正公民科学蚊虫数据收集过程中邻里社会经济空间抽样偏差。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 28;14(1):22462. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-73416-6.
2
Urban Flood Resilience Evaluation Based on Heterogeneous Data and Group Decision-Making.基于异构数据和群体决策的城市洪水韧性评估
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Sep 3;26(9):755. doi: 10.3390/e26090755.
3
Mapping the Heartbeat of America with ChatGPT-4: Unpacking the Interplay of Social Vulnerability, Digital Literacy, and Cardiovascular Mortality in County Residency Choices.
用ChatGPT-4描绘美国的心跳:剖析县域居住选择中社会脆弱性、数字素养与心血管死亡率之间的相互作用。
J Pers Med. 2023 Nov 21;13(12):1625. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121625.