• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle: A Quality Improvement Initiative.产科肛门括约肌损伤护理包:一项质量改进举措。
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Nov;35(11):2125-2130. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05885-2. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
2
A multi-centre quality improvement project to reduce the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): study protocol.一项旨在降低产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)发生率的多中心质量改进项目:研究方案。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Aug 13;18(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1965-0.
3
Impact of a quality improvement project to reduce the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a multicentre study with a stepped-wedge design.质量改进项目对降低产科肛门括约肌损伤率的影响:一项采用多中心、阶梯式设计的研究。
BJOG. 2021 Feb;128(3):584-592. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16396. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
4
Guideline No. 457: Obstetrical Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS) Part I: Prevention, Recognition, and Immediate Management.第457号指南:产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASIS) 第一部分:预防、识别与即时处理
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024 Dec;46(12):102719. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102719. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
5
Predicting obstetric anal sphincter injuries in a modern obstetric population.预测现代产科人群中的产科肛门括约肌损伤
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;215(3):310.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.041. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
6
[Definition, epidemiology and risk factors of obstetric anal sphincter injuries: CNGOF Perineal Prevention and Protection in Obstetrics Guidelines].[产科肛门括约肌损伤的定义、流行病学及危险因素:CNGOF产科会阴预防与保护指南]
Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 2018 Dec;46(12):913-921. doi: 10.1016/j.gofs.2018.10.028. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
7
A Care Bundle Aiming to Reduce the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Survey of Women's Experiences.旨在降低产科肛门括约肌损伤风险的护理包:女性体验调查
BJOG. 2025 Apr;132(5):588-595. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18029. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
8
Antibiotic use during repair of obstetrical anal sphincter injury: a quality improvement initiative.产科肛门括约肌损伤修复过程中的抗生素使用:一项质量改进措施。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Jan;156(1):95-101. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13623. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
9
Use of endoanal ultrasound for reducing the risk of complications related to anal sphincter injury after vaginal birth.使用经肛门超声降低阴道分娩后肛门括约肌损伤相关并发症的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 29;2015(10):CD010826. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010826.pub2.
10
Can ultrasound 10 days after obstetric anal sphincter injury predict anal incontinence at long-term follow-up?产后肛门括约肌损伤 10 天后的超声检查能否预测长期随访时的肛门失禁?
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Sep;32(9):2511-2520. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04733-x. Epub 2021 Mar 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Commentary on "Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle: A Quality Improvement Initiative".《产科肛门括约肌损伤护理包:一项质量改进举措》述评
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Nov;35(11):2231-2232. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05913-1. Epub 2024 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Evidence-Based Quality Improvement: a Scoping Review of the Literature.循证质量改进:文献综述
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Dec;37(16):4257-4267. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07602-5.
2
The OASI care bundle quality improvement project: lessons learned and future direction.OASI 护理捆绑包质量改进项目:经验教训和未来方向。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul;32(7):1989-1995. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04786-y. Epub 2021 May 14.
3
Antibiotic use during repair of obstetrical anal sphincter injury: a quality improvement initiative.产科肛门括约肌损伤修复过程中的抗生素使用:一项质量改进措施。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Jan;156(1):95-101. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13623. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
4
Review of available national guidelines for obstetric anal sphincter injury.产科肛门括约肌损伤现有国家指南综述。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Nov;31(11):2247-2259. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04464-5. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
5
Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women.低危初产妇引产与期待管理的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 9;379(6):513-523. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1800566.
6
Modified Beef Tongue Model for Fourth-Degree Laceration Repair Simulation.用于四度撕裂伤修复模拟的改良牛舌模型
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;129(3):491-496. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001908.
7
Practice Bulletin No. 165: Prevention and Management of Obstetric Lacerations at Vaginal Delivery.第165号实践公告:阴道分娩时产科裂伤的预防与处理
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;128(1):e1-e15. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001523.
8
Risk factors for recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury (rOASI): a systematic review and meta-analysis.复发性产科肛门括约肌损伤(rOASI)的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Jun;27(6):849-57. doi: 10.1007/s00192-015-2893-4. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
9
Wound complications after obstetric anal sphincter injuries.产科肛门括约肌损伤后的伤口并发症
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 May;125(5):1088-1093. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000833.
10
A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project.实施策略的精准汇编:实施变革专家建议(ERIC)项目的成果
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0209-1.

产科肛门括约肌损伤护理包:一项质量改进举措。

Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

作者信息

Powell T Clark, Hoke Tanya P, Norris Kyle P, Page Margaret R, Todd Allison, Redden David T, Brumfield Cynthia G, Straughn J Michael, Richter Holly E

机构信息

Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1700 6Th Ave S, 176F Suite 10382, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Nov;35(11):2125-2130. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05885-2. Epub 2024 Sep 27.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-024-05885-2
PMID:39331149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11638415/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The objective was to implement an evidence-based peri-partum care bundle for women sustaining obstetric anal sphincter injuries and to evaluate compliance with recommendations for antibiotics use, repair in the operating room, and follow-up before and after implementation.

METHODS

This project was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board and determined to be exempt. A clinical care bundle containing education and standardized orders in the electronic medical record was implemented. Characteristics of pre- (October 2017 to September 2019) and post-intervention (October 2019 to August 2021) cohorts were compared and compliance with recommendations for antibiotics use, surgical repair location, and follow-up were evaluated. Chi-squared, Fisher's exact, ANOVA F, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed, as indicated. Significance level was p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 185 cases were identified. Seventy-five percent of women were nulliparous. Mean gestational age was 39 weeks. Pre- and post-intervention groups did not differ in age, BMI, race, parity, gestational age, comorbidities, birthweight, or delivery type. Ninety-eight cases were identified pre-implementation. Eighty-six (88%) had third-degree lacerations. Post-implementation, 87 cases were identified. Seventy (80%) had third-degree lacerations (p = 0.17). Recommended antibiotic-type use improved from 35% pre-implementation to 93% post-implementation (p < 0.001). Repair in the operating room was similar pre-implementation and post-implementation (16.0% vs 12.6%, p = 0.48). Post-partum follow-up within 2 weeks improved from 16.3% pre-implementation to 52.8% post-implementation and mean time to follow-up was shorter post-implementation than pre-implementation (18 vs 33 days; both p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an evidence-based peri-partum care bundle resulted in standardization of care in accordance with established recommendations. Compliance with recommendations for surgical repair in the operating room remained unchanged.

摘要

引言与假设

目的是为遭受产科肛门括约肌损伤的女性实施基于证据的围产期护理包,并评估实施前后抗生素使用、手术室修复及随访建议的依从性。

方法

本项目经机构审查委员会审查,确定为豁免项目。实施了一个包含电子病历中的教育内容和标准化医嘱的临床护理包。比较了干预前(2017年10月至2019年9月)和干预后(2019年10月至2021年8月)队列的特征,并评估了抗生素使用、手术修复位置及随访建议的依从性。根据需要进行了卡方检验、Fisher精确检验、方差分析F检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验。显著性水平为p < 0.05。

结果

共识别出185例病例。75%的女性为初产妇。平均孕周为39周。干预前和干预后组在年龄、体重指数、种族、产次、孕周、合并症、出生体重或分娩类型方面无差异。实施前识别出98例病例。其中86例(88%)为三度裂伤。实施后,识别出87例病例。其中70例(80%)为三度裂伤(p = 0.17)。推荐抗生素类型的使用从实施前的35%提高到实施后的93%(p < 0.001)。实施前和实施后在手术室进行修复的情况相似(16.0%对12.6%,p = 0.48)。产后2周内的随访从实施前的16.3%提高到实施后的52.8%,且实施后的平均随访时间比实施前短(18天对33天;两者p < 0.001)。

结论

实施基于证据的围产期护理包导致护理按照既定建议实现标准化。手术室手术修复建议的依从性保持不变。