• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

旨在降低产科肛门括约肌损伤风险的护理包:女性体验调查

A Care Bundle Aiming to Reduce the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Survey of Women's Experiences.

作者信息

Jurczuk Magdalena, Phillips Lizzie, Bidwell Posy, Martinez Dorian, Silverton Louise, Sevdalis Nick, van der Meulen Jan, Gurol-Urganci Ipek, Thakar Ranee

机构信息

Centre for Quality Improvement and Clinical Audit, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK.

Maternity Services, University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, Devon, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2025 Apr;132(5):588-595. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18029. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.18029
PMID:39663780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11879911/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study experiences of women who gave birth in maternity units that have implemented a 'care bundle' quality improvement initiative to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and associated morbidity.

DESIGN

Postnatal electronic questionnaire.

SETTING

Twenty-nine maternity units across England, Scotland and Wales.

POPULATION

Women with live vaginal births.

METHODS

Descriptive statistics for quantitative results. Analysis of free-text responses informed by framework method.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Experience with components of the care bundle: information provision, manual perineal protection (MPP) and post-birth rectal examination.

RESULTS

In this study, 1208 women completed the survey: 684 (56.6%) said they received antenatal information about perineal health, 377 (31.2%) recalled MPP, and 664 (55.0%) recalled rectal examination. Of the 684 women who said they received antenatal information, 595 (87.0%) agreed that the information was easy to understand, and 423 (61.8%) agreed that it helped them to make their own choices to reduce their OASI risk. One hundred and fifty-four (22.5%) agreed that the information made them fearful about giving birth vaginally. Of the 377 women who recalled MPP, 203 (53.9%) felt it provided them with support, and another 97 (25.7%) did not mind the sensation. Of the 664 women who recalled rectal examination, 281 (42.3%) did not mind the exam, and another 335 (50.5%) felt it was uncomfortable but understood its importance. Free-text responses aligned with quantitative results.

CONCLUSIONS

Many women did not recall MPP or rectal examination. The reported experiences for those who recalled these components do not support concerns that the OASI care bundle has negative effects on women's experiences.

摘要

目的

研究在实施了“护理包”质量改进举措以降低产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)及相关发病率的产科病房分娩的女性的经历。

设计

产后电子问卷。

地点

英格兰、苏格兰和威尔士的29个产科病房。

研究对象

经阴道顺产的女性。

方法

对定量结果进行描述性统计。采用框架法对自由文本回复进行分析。

主要观察指标

护理包各组成部分的体验:信息提供、手动会阴保护(MPP)和产后直肠检查。

结果

在本研究中,1208名女性完成了调查:684名(56.6%)表示她们收到了有关会阴健康的产前信息,377名(31.2%)回忆起进行了MPP,664名(55.0%)回忆起进行了直肠检查。在684名表示收到产前信息的女性中,595名(87.0%)认为信息易于理解,423名(61.8%)认为这有助于她们做出自己的选择以降低OASI风险。154名(22.5%)认为该信息使她们对阴道分娩感到恐惧。在377名回忆起进行了MPP的女性中,203名(53.9%)觉得这为她们提供了支持,另外97名(25.7%)不介意这种感觉。在664名回忆起进行了直肠检查的女性中,281名(42.3%)不介意检查,另外335名(50.5%)觉得不舒服但理解其重要性。自由文本回复与定量结果一致。

结论

许多女性没有回忆起MPP或直肠检查。对于那些回忆起这些组成部分的女性所报告的经历并不支持关于OASI护理包会对女性经历产生负面影响的担忧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6524/11879911/0ae1edd4af74/BJO-132-588-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6524/11879911/848cd6f743b1/BJO-132-588-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6524/11879911/0ae1edd4af74/BJO-132-588-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6524/11879911/848cd6f743b1/BJO-132-588-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6524/11879911/0ae1edd4af74/BJO-132-588-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Care Bundle Aiming to Reduce the Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury: A Survey of Women's Experiences.旨在降低产科肛门括约肌损伤风险的护理包:女性体验调查
BJOG. 2025 Apr;132(5):588-595. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.18029. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
2
A multi-centre quality improvement project to reduce the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI): study protocol.一项旨在降低产科肛门括约肌损伤(OASI)发生率的多中心质量改进项目:研究方案。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Aug 13;18(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1965-0.
3
Impact of a quality improvement project to reduce the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a multicentre study with a stepped-wedge design.质量改进项目对降低产科肛门括约肌损伤率的影响:一项采用多中心、阶梯式设计的研究。
BJOG. 2021 Feb;128(3):584-592. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16396. Epub 2020 Aug 9.
4
Women's experiences of the OASI Care Bundle; a package of care to reduce severe perineal trauma.女性对 OASI 护理包的体验;减少严重会阴创伤的护理包。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul;32(7):1807-1816. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04653-2. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
5
Which elements were significant in reducing obstetric anal sphincter injury? A prospective follow-up study.哪些因素在降低产科肛门括约肌损伤方面具有重要意义?一项前瞻性随访研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Nov 18;21(1):781. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04260-z.
6
Exploring clinicians' perspectives on the 'Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle' national quality improvement programme: a qualitative study.探索临床医生对“产科肛门括约肌损伤护理包”国家质量改进计划的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Sep 9;10(9):e035674. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035674.
7
OASI2: a cluster randomised hybrid evaluation of strategies for sustainable implementation of the Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle in maternity units in Great Britain.OASI2:一项针对英国产科单位中产科肛门括约肌损伤护理包可持续实施策略的集群随机混合评估。
Implement Sci. 2021 May 22;16(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01125-z.
8
Use of endoanal ultrasound for reducing the risk of complications related to anal sphincter injury after vaginal birth.使用经肛门超声降低阴道分娩后肛门括约肌损伤相关并发症的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 29;2015(10):CD010826. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010826.pub2.
9
The prevention of perineal trauma during vaginal birth.阴道分娩时会阴创伤的预防。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S991-S1004. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.021. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
10
The OASI care bundle quality improvement project: lessons learned and future direction.OASI 护理捆绑包质量改进项目:经验教训和未来方向。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul;32(7):1989-1995. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04786-y. Epub 2021 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies for improving maternal care for ethnic minority women with obstetric anal sphincter injuries in the UK.英国改善对患有产科肛门括约肌损伤的少数民族妇女的孕产妇护理的策略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12441-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries during instrumental vaginal delivery: An observational study based on 18-years of real-world data.器械性阴道分娩时的产科肛门括约肌损伤:基于 18 年真实世界数据的观察性研究。
BJOG. 2024 Dec;131(13):1824-1831. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17914. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
2
Reproductive history of parous women and urinary incontinence in midlife: A National Birth Cohort follow-up study.生育史与中年女性尿失禁:一项全国性出生队列随访研究。
BJOG. 2024 Oct;131(11):1495-1505. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17862. Epub 2024 May 27.
3
The relationship between perineal trauma and postpartum psychological outcomes: a secondary analysis of a population-based survey.
会阴创伤与产后心理结局的关系:基于人群的调查二次分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Sep 6;23(1):639. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05950-6.
4
Impact of sampling and data collection methods on maternity survey response: a randomised controlled trial of paper and push-to-web surveys and a concurrent social media survey.采样和数据收集方法对产妇调查应答率的影响:纸质和推送至网络调查与同期社交媒体调查的随机对照试验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Jan 12;23(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01833-8.
5
The incidence of anal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injury graded using the Sultan classification: a network meta-analysis.经 Sultan 分级的产科肛门括约肌损伤后肛门失禁的发生率:一项网络荟萃分析。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jun;228(6):675-688.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.11.1279. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
6
The impact of a perineal care bundle on women's birth experiences in Queensland, Australia: A qualitative thematic analysis.《澳大利亚昆士兰州会阴护理套餐对女性分娩体验的影响:定性主题分析》。
Women Birth. 2023 May;36(3):271-280. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.09.002. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
7
Adverse pregnancy outcomes attributable to socioeconomic and ethnic inequalities in England: a national cohort study.归因于英格兰社会经济和种族不平等的不良妊娠结局:一项全国队列研究。
Lancet. 2021 Nov 20;398(10314):1905-1912. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01595-6. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
8
Impact of a quality improvement project to reduce the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injury: a multicentre study with a stepped-wedge design: OASI care bundle: OASI care bundle.一项旨在降低产科肛门括约肌损伤发生率的质量改进项目的影响:一项采用阶梯楔形设计的多中心研究:产科肛门括约肌损伤护理包:产科肛门括约肌损伤护理包
BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(1):174-175. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16885. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
9
OASI2: a cluster randomised hybrid evaluation of strategies for sustainable implementation of the Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle in maternity units in Great Britain.OASI2:一项针对英国产科单位中产科肛门括约肌损伤护理包可持续实施策略的集群随机混合评估。
Implement Sci. 2021 May 22;16(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01125-z.
10
The OASI care bundle quality improvement project: lessons learned and future direction.OASI 护理捆绑包质量改进项目:经验教训和未来方向。
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul;32(7):1989-1995. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04786-y. Epub 2021 May 14.