• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左侧结肠切除术后使用电动圆形吻合器行结直肠吻合的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Effect of powered circular stapler in colorectal anastomosis after left-sided colic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Colorectal Surgery Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Via Venezian 1, 20133, Milan, Italy.

General Surgery Residency Program, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Sep 27;39(1):152. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04729-1.

DOI:10.1007/s00384-024-04729-1
PMID:39331160
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11436432/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Anastomotic leak (AL) remains the most important complication after left-sided colic anastomoses and technical complications during anastomotic construction are responsible of higher leakage incidence. Powered circular stapler (PCS) in colorectal surgery has been introduced in order to reduce technical errors and post-operative complications due to the manual circular stapler (MCS).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. An electronic systematic search was performed using Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase of studies comparing PCS and MCS. The incidence of AL, anastomotic bleeding (AB), conversion, and reoperation were assessed. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42024512644.

RESULTS

Five observational studies were eligible for inclusion reporting on 2379 patients. The estimated pooled Risk Ratios for AL and AB rates following PCS were significantly lower than those observed with MCS (0.44 and 0.23, respectively; both with p < 0.01). Conversion and reoperation rate did not show any significant difference: 0.41 (95% CI 0.09-1.88; p = 0.25) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.33-1.84; p = 0.57); respectively.

CONCLUSION

The use of PCS demonstrates a lower incidence of AL and AB compared to MCS but does not exhibit a discernible influence on reintervention or conversion rates. The call for future randomized clinical trials aims to definitively clarify these issues and contribute to further advancements in refining surgical strategies for left-sided colonic resection.

摘要

目的

吻合口漏(AL)仍然是左侧结肠吻合术后最重要的并发症,吻合口构建过程中的技术并发症是导致更高漏诊率的原因。为了减少手动吻合器(MCS)导致的技术误差和术后并发症,在结直肠手术中引入了电动圆形吻合器(PCS)。

方法

进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。使用 Web of Science、PubMed 和 Embase 电子系统搜索比较 PCS 和 MCS 的研究。评估了 AL、吻合口出血(AB)、转换和再次手术的发生率。PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42024512644。

结果

五项观察性研究符合纳入标准,共报告了 2379 例患者。与 MCS 相比,PCS 后 AL 和 AB 发生率的估计合并风险比显著降低(分别为 0.44 和 0.23,均 p < 0.01)。转换和再次手术率没有显著差异:0.41(95%CI 0.09-1.88;p = 0.25)和 0.78(95%CI 0.33-1.84;p = 0.57)。

结论

与 MCS 相比,PCS 的使用显示出较低的 AL 和 AB 发生率,但对再干预或转换率没有明显影响。未来随机临床试验的呼吁旨在明确这些问题,并有助于进一步改进左侧结肠切除术的手术策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85c1/11436432/1727a82378e6/384_2024_4729_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85c1/11436432/ddf8f444c46a/384_2024_4729_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85c1/11436432/1727a82378e6/384_2024_4729_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85c1/11436432/ddf8f444c46a/384_2024_4729_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85c1/11436432/1727a82378e6/384_2024_4729_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of powered circular stapler in colorectal anastomosis after left-sided colic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis.左侧结肠切除术后使用电动圆形吻合器行结直肠吻合的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Sep 27;39(1):152. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04729-1.
2
Incidence of anastomotic leakage using powered circular staplers versus manual circular staplers for left colorectal anastomosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.使用电动吻合器与手动吻合器行左半结直肠吻合术吻合口漏的发生率:成本效果分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Jul 2;28(1):76. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02936-0.
3
Circular staplers and anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: meta-analysis.圆形吻合器与结直肠手术中的吻合口漏:荟萃分析
BJS Open. 2025 Mar 4;9(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae170.
4
Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study.吻合器对直肠吻合术后吻合口漏的影响:倾向评分匹配研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Aug 10;38(1):211. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04506-6.
5
Impact of the novel powered circular stapler on risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal anastomosis: a propensity score-matched study.新型电动环切吻合器对结直肠吻合口吻合口漏风险的影响:倾向评分匹配研究。
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Mar;25(3):279-284. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02338-y. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
6
Anastomotic leak after manual circular stapled left-sided bowel surgery: analysis of technology-, disease-, and patient-related factors.手工环形吻合术治疗左侧肠手术后吻合口漏:技术、疾病和患者相关因素分析。
BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae089.
7
Current evidence on powered versus manual circular staplers in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.结直肠手术中电动与手动圆形吻合器的当前证据:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jan 15;40(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04807-y.
8
Two-row, three-row or powered circular stapler, which to choose when performing colorectal anastomosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.双吻合器、三吻合器还是电动吻合器?结直肠吻合术时该如何选择?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Apr 12;39(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04625-8.
9
Anastomotic leak rate following the implementation of a powered circular stapler in elective colorectal surgeries: a retrospective cohort study.在择期结直肠手术中使用电动圆形吻合器后吻合口漏的发生率:一项回顾性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5541-5546. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11082-5. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
10
The impact of powered circular staplers on anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal cancer surgeries.电动圆形吻合器对左半结直肠癌手术吻合口漏的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):6111-6119. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11215-w. Epub 2024 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Current evidence on powered versus manual circular staplers in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.结直肠手术中电动与手动圆形吻合器的当前证据:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Jan 15;40(1):13. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04807-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of centre volume on pathological outcomes and postoperative complications after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of a multicentre national study.中心体积对结直肠癌手术后病理结果和术后并发症的影响:一项多中心全国性研究的结果。
Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 3;111(1). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad373.
2
Risk of anastomotic leakage with two-row versus three-row manual circular staplers in colorectal anastomosis: a U.S. cohort study.两排与三排手动圆形吻合器在结直肠吻合术中吻合口漏的风险:一项美国队列研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Nov 7;38(1):264. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04552-0.
3
Impact of powered circular stapler on anastomotic leak after anastomosis to the rectum: a propensity score matched study.
吻合器对直肠吻合术后吻合口漏的影响:倾向评分匹配研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Aug 10;38(1):211. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04506-6.
4
Impact of a circular powered stapler on preventing anastomotic leakage in patients with left-sided colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.圆形吻合器对预防左半结直肠癌患者吻合口漏的影响:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Surg. 2023 Jul 18;23(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02104-5.
5
Use of a Powered Circular Stapler Can Prevent Anastomotic Air Leakage in Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer.使用电动圆形吻合器可预防机器人直肠癌低位前切除术的吻合口漏气。
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2023 Apr 25;7(2):82-90. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2022-069. eCollection 2023.
6
Optimal anastomotic technique in rectal surgery to prevent anastomotic leakage.直肠手术中预防吻合口漏的最佳吻合技术。
Ann Coloproctol. 2023 Apr;39(2):97-105. doi: 10.3393/ac.2022.00787.0112. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
7
Indirect comparison between powered and manual circular staplers for left-sided colorectal anastomoses: clinical and economic outcomes in China.电动与手动圆形吻合器用于左侧结直肠吻合术的间接比较:中国的临床与经济结果
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2022 Aug 31;20(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12962-022-00380-1.
8
Economic Analysis of Leak Complications in Anastomoses Performed with Powered versus Manual Circular Staplers in Left-Sided Colorectal Resections: A US-Based Cost Analysis.左侧结直肠切除术中使用电动与手动圆形吻合器进行吻合的渗漏并发症的经济分析:一项基于美国的成本分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 Jun 17;13:531-540. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S305296. eCollection 2021.
9
Outcomes associated with the use of a new powered circular stapler for left-sided colorectal reconstructions: a propensity score matching-adjusted indirect comparison with manual circular staplers.新型电动圆形吻合器在左半结直肠重建中的应用效果:与手动圆形吻合器的倾向性评分匹配调整间接比较。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Apr;36(4):2541-2553. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08542-7. Epub 2021 May 24.
10
Assessment of a circular powered stapler for creation of anastomosis in left-sided colorectal surgery: A prospective cohort study.评估圆形电动吻合器在左半结直肠手术中吻合口的建立:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2020 Dec;84:140-146. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.11.001. Epub 2020 Nov 8.