Fukumoto Yuki, Fujii Keisuke, Todo Marina, Suzuki Toshiaki
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kansai University of Health Sciences, 2-11-1 Wakaba Sennangun, Kumatori, Osaka, 590-0482, Japan.
Graduate School of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Kansai University of Health Sciences, 2-11-1 Wakaba Sennangun, Kumatori, Osaka, 590-0482, Japan.
Cogn Process. 2025 Feb;26(1):15-27. doi: 10.1007/s10339-024-01231-y. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
Verification of the effectiveness of motor imagery (MI) has mainly focused on the method of implementing MI, and few studies have assessed individual factors. This study examined the individual differences in MI effects from the viewpoint of the multiple components of working memory. Forty-six healthy subjects (mean age 20.8 years) performed the Stroop Test (central executive within working memory) and reverse chanting (phonological loop within working memory). Then, F-waves were measured at rest for 30 s, the Purdue Pegboard was performed with the non-dominant hand to evaluate finger dexterity (Peg score) before MI, F-waves were measured during 30 s of kinesthetic MI, and the Peg score was evaluated after MI. For statistical analysis, the amplitude F/M ratio and Peg score were used as dependent variables, and the subjects were divided into Good and Poor groups according to cognitive function. The results showed an interaction for the amplitude F/M ratio and Peg score when grouped by reverse inverse chanting. In the subsequent simple main effect analysis, the Peg score was significantly improved after MI in both groups. The amplitude F/M ratio was significantly increased during MI compared to the resting state only in the Poor phonological loop group. Conversely, there was no interaction when the groups were divided by Stroop interference. No relationship was found between individual differences in central executive and changes in hand finger dexterity and spinal motor nerve excitability induced by MI. However, there may be a relationship between individual differences in phonological loops and changes in MI-induced finger dexterity and spinal motor nerve excitability.
运动想象(MI)有效性的验证主要集中在实施MI的方法上,很少有研究评估个体因素。本研究从工作记忆的多个组成部分的角度考察了MI效果的个体差异。46名健康受试者(平均年龄20.8岁)进行了Stroop测试(工作记忆中的中央执行系统)和倒叙(工作记忆中的语音回路)。然后,在静息状态下测量30秒的F波,在进行运动想象前用非优势手进行普渡钉板测试以评估手指灵活性(钉板得分),在运动感觉性运动想象的30秒内测量F波,并在运动想象后评估钉板得分。在统计分析中,将F/M波幅比和钉板得分作为因变量,并根据认知功能将受试者分为良好组和较差组。结果显示,按倒叙分组时,F/M波幅比和钉板得分存在交互作用。在随后的简单主效应分析中,两组在运动想象后钉板得分均显著提高。仅在语音回路较差组中,与静息状态相比,运动想象期间F/M波幅比显著增加。相反,按Stroop干扰分组时没有交互作用。未发现中央执行系统的个体差异与运动想象引起的手指灵活性和脊髓运动神经兴奋性变化之间存在关联。然而,语音回路的个体差异与运动想象引起的手指灵活性和脊髓运动神经兴奋性变化之间可能存在关联。