• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种抑制性酚酸对豚草(Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.)的生长有最小的影响,无论是在体外还是在体内。

Three inhibitory phenolic acids against common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) had a minimal effect on maize growth in vitro and in vivo.

机构信息

Department of Weed Science, Division of Phytomedicine, University of Zagreb Faculty of Agriculture, Zagreb, Croatia.

Department of Animal Nutrition, Division of Animal Science, University of Zagreb Faculty of Agriculture, Zagreb, Croatia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Sep 27;19(9):e0308825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308825. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0308825
PMID:39331639
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11432884/
Abstract

With the increasing demand for non-chemical weed control methods, phenolic acids have shown promise due to their natural weed inhibitory potential. In this study, the inhibitory effect of ferulic acid, vanillic acid and p-coumaric acid was investigated on Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. and the selectivity of Zea mays L. against these phenolic acids was tested. The seeds of A. artemisiifolia and Z. mays were treated in vitro with three phenolic acids at doses of 200-600 × 10-7 mol and in vivo foliar on A. artemisiifolia and Z. mays plants. While all phenolic acids had effects on the early growth of A. artemisiifolia, p-coumaric acid significantly reduced the length of radicle and hypocotyl by more than 60% while the effects on Z. mays were minimal. In vivo assessments using chlorophyll fluorescence and multispectral imaging showed selective stress responses in A. artemisiifolia but not in Z. mays after foliar application. The in vitro results show that p-coumaric acid is a promising compound for the control of A. artemisiifolia. However, these phenolic acids at these doses led to an insufficient reduction in photochemical efficiency. Therefore, these natural compounds need to be combined with other methods of weed control.

摘要

随着对非化学除草方法需求的增加,由于其天然的除草抑制潜力,酚酸类物质显示出了前景。本研究调查了阿魏酸、香草酸和对香豆酸对豚草属植物的抑制作用,并测试了这些酚酸类物质对玉米的选择性。用三种酚酸(浓度为 200-600×10-7mol)对豚草属植物和玉米的种子进行离体处理,对豚草属植物和玉米植株进行叶面处理。虽然所有的酚酸类物质都对豚草属植物的早期生长有影响,但对香豆酸显著降低了根和下胚轴的长度,超过 60%,而对玉米的影响则最小。体内使用叶绿素荧光和多光谱成像评估显示,叶面处理后,豚草属植物出现了选择性胁迫反应,但玉米则没有。体外研究结果表明,对香豆酸是控制豚草属植物的一种很有前途的化合物。然而,在这些剂量下,这些酚酸类物质导致光化学效率的降低不足。因此,这些天然化合物需要与其他除草方法结合使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a2/11432884/a633d577e86a/pone.0308825.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a2/11432884/f0dcf4ca002c/pone.0308825.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a2/11432884/1f0869c3417f/pone.0308825.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a2/11432884/40628f8d8538/pone.0308825.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a2/11432884/a633d577e86a/pone.0308825.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a2/11432884/f0dcf4ca002c/pone.0308825.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a2/11432884/1f0869c3417f/pone.0308825.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a2/11432884/40628f8d8538/pone.0308825.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80a2/11432884/a633d577e86a/pone.0308825.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Three inhibitory phenolic acids against common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) had a minimal effect on maize growth in vitro and in vivo.三种抑制性酚酸对豚草(Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.)的生长有最小的影响,无论是在体外还是在体内。
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 27;19(9):e0308825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308825. eCollection 2024.
2
Selected Phenolic Acids Inhibit the Initial Growth of L.选定的酚酸抑制罗伊氏乳杆菌的初期生长
Biology (Basel). 2022 Mar 22;11(4):482. doi: 10.3390/biology11040482.
3
Allelopathic effects of ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) on cultivated plants.豚草(Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.)对栽培植物的化感作用。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2011;76(3):545-9.
4
Examination of common ragweed's (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) allelopathic effect on some weed species.豚草(Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.)对某些杂草物种化感作用的研究。
Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci. 2010;75(2):107-11.
5
On the metabolites produced by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides a fungus proposed for the Ambrosia artemisiifolia biocontrol; spectroscopic data and absolute configuration assignment of colletochlorin A.关于胶孢炭疽菌产生的代谢产物,该真菌被提议用于豚草的生物防治;炭疽菌素A的光谱数据和绝对构型确定
Nat Prod Res. 2018 Jul;32(13):1537-1547. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2017.1385020. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
6
Correction: Three inhibitory phenolic acids against common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) had a minimal effect on maize growth in vitro and in vivo.更正:三种对豚草(Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.)有抑制作用的酚酸对玉米的体外和体内生长影响极小。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 4;20(4):e0322155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322155. eCollection 2025.
7
First European Report of a Leaf Spot on Common Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) Caused by a Phoma sp.欧洲首例由茎点霉属真菌引起的普通豚草叶斑病报告
Plant Dis. 2009 Jul;93(7):763. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-93-7-0763B.
8
Effect of repetitive mowing on common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) pollen and seed production.反复割草对豚草(Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.)花粉和种子产量的影响。
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2011;18(1):55-62.
9
Inhibitory Effects of Brassicaceae Cover Crop on Germination and Early Growth.十字花科覆盖作物对种子萌发和早期生长的抑制作用。
Plants (Basel). 2021 Apr 17;10(4):794. doi: 10.3390/plants10040794.
10
Evaluation of the antioxidant properties and bioavailability of free and bound phenolic acids from Trichilia emetica Vahl.对 Trichilia emetica Vahl 中游离和结合酚酸的抗氧化特性及生物利用度的评估。
J Ethnopharmacol. 2006 May 24;105(3):368-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2005.11.029. Epub 2006 Jan 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Correction: Three inhibitory phenolic acids against common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) had a minimal effect on maize growth in vitro and in vivo.更正:三种对豚草(Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.)有抑制作用的酚酸对玉米的体外和体内生长影响极小。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 4;20(4):e0322155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322155. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Biochemical analysis, photosynthetic gene (psbA) down-regulation, and in silico receptor prediction in weeds in response to exogenous application of phenolic acids and their analogs.生物化学分析、光合基因 (psbA) 下调及杂草对酚酸及其类似物外源应用的计算机受体预测。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0277146. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277146. eCollection 2023.
2
Evaluation of allelopathic effects of Parthenium hysterophorus L. methanolic extracts on some selected plants and weeds.评估豚草甲醇提取物对一些选定的植物和杂草的化感作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 6;18(1):e0280159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280159. eCollection 2023.
3
Dynamic analysis of physiological indices and transcriptome profiling revealing the mechanisms of the allelopathic effects of phenolic acids on .
生理指标的动态分析和转录组图谱揭示酚酸化感作用的机制 。(原文句子不完整,缺少作用对象)
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Oct 18;13:1039507. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1039507. eCollection 2022.
4
Selected Phenolic Acids Inhibit the Initial Growth of L.选定的酚酸抑制罗伊氏乳杆菌的初期生长
Biology (Basel). 2022 Mar 22;11(4):482. doi: 10.3390/biology11040482.
5
Modeling the Solubility of Phenolic Acids in Aqueous Media at 37 °C.在 37°C 下对水中酚酸的溶解度进行建模。
Molecules. 2021 Oct 28;26(21):6500. doi: 10.3390/molecules26216500.
6
Insect and plant invasions follow two waves of globalisation.昆虫和植物入侵遵循全球化的两个浪潮。
Ecol Lett. 2021 Nov;24(11):2418-2426. doi: 10.1111/ele.13863. Epub 2021 Aug 22.
7
Inhibitory Effects of Brassicaceae Cover Crop on Germination and Early Growth.十字花科覆盖作物对种子萌发和早期生长的抑制作用。
Plants (Basel). 2021 Apr 17;10(4):794. doi: 10.3390/plants10040794.
8
Application of Phenotyping Methods in Detection of Drought and Salinity Stress in Basil ( L.).表型分析方法在罗勒(Ocimum basilicum L.)干旱和盐胁迫检测中的应用
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Feb 18;12:629441. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.629441. eCollection 2021.
9
Allelopathic effect of Artemisia argyi on the germination and growth of various weeds.艾草对各种杂草的发芽和生长的化感作用。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 22;11(1):4303. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83752-6.
10
Effects of mixtures of allelopathic plant water extracts and a herbicide on weed suppression.化感植物水提取物与除草剂混合物对杂草抑制的影响。
J Environ Sci Health B. 2021;56(1):16-22. doi: 10.1080/03601234.2020.1831862. Epub 2020 Oct 13.