• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Conducting mixed methods research with women in a forensic mental health setting: A reflexive account from a nurse as researcher.在法医心理健康环境中对女性进行混合方法研究:护士作为研究者的反思性叙述。
Nurs Open. 2024 Sep;11(9):e70038. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70038.
2
Development and evaluation of a de-escalation training intervention in adult acute and forensic units: the EDITION systematic review and feasibility trial.成人急症和法医病房中降级治疗培训干预措施的制定和评估:EDITION 系统评价和可行性试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(3):1-120. doi: 10.3310/FGGW6874.
3
Being reflexive in qualitative grounded theory: discussion and application of a model of reflexivity.质性扎根理论中的反思性:反思性模型的探讨与应用
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Jul;71(7):1530-8. doi: 10.1111/jan.12653. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
4
Nurse researcher identity and reflexivity in interpretive phenomenological analysis: a personal narrative.护士研究者身份与阐释现象学分析中的反思:个人叙事。
Nurse Res. 2023 Jun 7;31(2):28-35. doi: 10.7748/nr.2023.e1870. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
5
The journey of positioning self as both mental health nurse and qualitative researcher: a critical reflection.将自己定位为心理健康护士和定性研究者的历程:批判性反思
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2015 Sep;22(7):543-8. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12238.
6
Exploring the frequency, duration and experience of seclusion for women in a forensic mental health setting: a mixed-methods study protocol.探索法医心理健康环境中女性被隔离的频率、持续时间和体验:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 8;11(6):e044261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044261.
7
"I found it daunting": An exploration of educational needs and experiences of mental health student nurses working with children and adolescents with eating disorders.“我觉得这很艰巨”:一项关于精神健康学生护士在儿童和青少年进食障碍方面的教育需求和经验的探索。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Dec;27(6):678-688. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12619. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
8
Use of reflexivity in a mixed-methods study.在混合方法研究中使用反思性。
Nurse Res. 2013 Jan;20(3):38-43. doi: 10.7748/nr2013.01.20.3.38.c9496.
9
Presenting research reflexivity in your PhD thesis.在博士论文中呈现研究反身性。
Nurse Res. 2020 Sep 16;28(3):37-43. doi: 10.7748/nr.2020.e1644. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
10
Reflections on being an insider researcher: a study exploring the experiences of men accessing rural mental health services.作为内部研究人员的反思:一项探索男性获取农村心理健康服务体验的研究。
Nurse Res. 2024 Sep 11;32(3):27-33. doi: 10.7748/nr.2024.e1909. Epub 2024 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the impact of patient and public involvement on doctoral students in palliative dementia care research.评估患者及公众参与对姑息性痴呆护理研究中博士生的影响。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 3;11(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00715-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Are Women Really Different? Comparison of Men and Women in a Sample of Forensic Psychiatric Inpatients.女性真的有差异吗?法医精神病住院患者样本中男性与女性的比较。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 23;13:857468. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.857468. eCollection 2022.
2
A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149.质性研究中反思性的实用指南:AMEE指南第149号
Med Teach. 2022 Apr 7:1-11. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287.
3
What do we know about the experience of seclusion in a forensic setting? An integrative literature review.我们对法医学环境中的隔离体验了解多少?一项综合文献回顾。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Oct;31(5):1109-1124. doi: 10.1111/inm.13002. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
4
Female Forensic Patients May Be an Atypical Sub-type of Females Presenting Aggressive and Antisocial Behavior.女性法医患者可能是表现出攻击性行为和反社会行为的女性中的一种非典型亚型。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Feb 10;13:809901. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.809901. eCollection 2022.
5
Coercive Measures in Psychiatry: A Review of Ethical Arguments.精神病学中的强制手段:伦理观点综述
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 14;12:790886. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.790886. eCollection 2021.
6
Making Lived-Experience Research Accessible: A Design Thinking Approach to Co-Creating Knowledge Translation Resources Based on Evidence.让生活体验研究变得易于理解:一种基于证据的共同创造知识转化资源的设计思维方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 2;18(17):9250. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179250.
7
Perspectives on Recruitment and Representativeness in Forensic Psychiatric Research.法医精神病学研究中的招募与代表性观点
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 17;12:647450. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.647450. eCollection 2021.
8
Exploring the frequency, duration and experience of seclusion for women in a forensic mental health setting: a mixed-methods study protocol.探索法医心理健康环境中女性被隔离的频率、持续时间和体验:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 8;11(6):e044261. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044261.
9
Engaging a person with lived experience of mental illness in a collaborative care model feasibility study.让有精神疾病亲身经历的人参与一项协作式照护模式可行性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jan 8;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00247-w.
10
Benchmarking to reduce restrictive practices in forensic mental health services: a Delphi study.基准测试以减少法医心理健康服务中的限制性行为:德尔菲研究。
Australas Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;29(4):384-388. doi: 10.1177/1039856220946634. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

在法医心理健康环境中对女性进行混合方法研究:护士作为研究者的反思性叙述。

Conducting mixed methods research with women in a forensic mental health setting: A reflexive account from a nurse as researcher.

机构信息

School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2024 Sep;11(9):e70038. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70038.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.70038
PMID:39331801
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11432457/
Abstract

AIMS

To describe a reflexive account of a mental health nurse as researcher undertaking a mixed methods study as part of a doctoral degree, with women in a secure forensic hospital.

DESIGN

A discursive paper that draws upon the primary author's experience of dual roles as a mental health nurse and a novice researcher, and relevant literature pertaining to positionality and reflexivity in the context of conducting mixed methods research.

METHODS

A mixed methods study was conducted within a secure forensic hospital in Australia, to identify factors associated with the frequency and duration of seclusion for women and, to explore their experiences of seclusion. Notes and a reflective diary were used to demonstrate the reflexive approach and strategies used throughout the study design and data collection stages of the research.

RESULTS

Women in the secure forensic hospital setting often have complex histories and experiences and are considered a vulnerable group, which can add additional challenges when undertaking research with this population. As a doctoral student with clinical experience in mental health undertaking research in the forensic hospital setting with women, positionality and the connection with reflexivity requires exploration to understand self and the influence on research. This understanding along with identified strategies to enhance reflexivity, supports the management of the dual nurse as researcher roles to enhance all stages of the research process.

CONCLUSION

Doctoral nursing candidates undertaking clinical research in their area of clinical practice and at the location of previous employment, may experience challenges in relation to identity and the dichotomy of roles. Further challenges can be posed when research involves complex populations and/or controversial practices. Support to balance role conflict and maintain reflexivity is critical to understanding the role of self in research and to enhance credibility.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR CLINICAL PRACTICE: Women are a complex, yet minority population in forensic mental health settings, however the numbers of women being admitted to services is increasing. Future research may consider the use of the strategies explored here to enhance the reflexive process, and support future researchers in this field to conduct research that aims to support an often-misheard population to better support health outcomes.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

There was no patient or public contribution to this paper, however the study in which this paper is based on, is grounded in the experience of patients (women).

摘要

目的

描述一名心理健康护士作为研究人员在攻读博士学位期间,以女性为研究对象,在一家安全的法医精神病院从事混合方法研究的反思性叙述。

设计

这是一篇论述性论文,借鉴了主要作者作为心理健康护士和新手研究人员的双重角色的经验,以及与混合方法研究背景下的定位和反思性相关的文献。

方法

在澳大利亚的一家安全法医精神病院中进行了一项混合方法研究,以确定与女性禁闭频率和持续时间相关的因素,并探讨她们的禁闭经历。研究设计和数据收集阶段使用笔记和反思日记来展示反思性方法和策略。

结果

安全法医精神病院环境中的女性通常具有复杂的病史和经历,被认为是弱势群体,这在对该人群进行研究时会带来额外的挑战。作为一名具有心理健康临床经验的博士生,在法医精神病院环境中从事女性研究,定位和与反思性的联系需要探索,以了解自我和对研究的影响。这种理解以及确定的增强反思性的策略,支持了管理护士作为研究人员的双重角色,以增强研究过程的各个阶段。

结论

在其临床实践领域和以前工作地点从事临床研究的护理博士生可能会在身份和角色二分法方面面临挑战。当研究涉及复杂人群和/或有争议的实践时,可能会带来进一步的挑战。平衡角色冲突和保持反思性的支持对于理解自我在研究中的作用以及增强可信度至关重要。

对专业和/或临床实践的影响:女性是法医精神病学环境中复杂但少数群体,然而,被送往服务机构的女性人数正在增加。未来的研究可能会考虑使用这里探索的策略来增强反思性过程,并为该领域的未来研究人员提供支持,以开展旨在更好地支持健康结果的研究。

患者或公众参与

本文没有患者或公众的贡献,但是本文所基于的研究是基于患者(女性)的经验。