Impact of incidental dural tears on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Incidental dural tear (DT) during cervical spine surgery is a feared complication. However, its impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains unclear.

PURPOSE

To determine the influence of DTs on PROs 1 year after cervical spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery for cervical spondylosis, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), and cervical disc herniation.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Analysis included patients' characteristics, perioperative complications, and PROs both preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively.

METHODS

This study enrolled consecutive patients who underwent elective cervical spine surgery at 13 high-volume spine centers. All patients were required to complete questionnaires both preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively, which included PROs such as numerical rating scales of pain or dysesthesia for each part of the body, Neck Disability Index NDI, and Core Outcome Measures Index. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the presence (DT+) or absence (DT-) of dural injury. Comparisons were made regarding patient background, perioperative complications, and pre and postoperative PROs. Propensity score matching was also utilized to adjust for patient background, and further comparisons were made regarding complication rates and PROs.

RESULTS

Out of 2,704 patients, dural tears were identified in 97 (3.6%) cases. The DT+ group had a significantly higher proportion of fixation surgeries, upper cervical surgeries, OPLL, and revision surgeries. Perioperative complications were significantly higher in the DT+ group, including intraoperative nerve damage, postoperative paralysis, surgical site infections (SSI), and cerebrovascular complications. Outcomes collected from 2,163 patients (79.9%) revealed significantly more severe neck and upper limb pain in the DT+ group. After propensity score matching, significant differences persisted in postoperative paralysis and SSI in the DT+ group, but no significant differences were observed in PROs.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with dural tears showed nearly equivalent postoperative outcomes at 1 year following cervical spine surgery compared to those without dural tears. However, the incidence of perioperative complications was higher, emphasizing the need for careful management.