Suppr超能文献

对健康女性捐赠者乳腺组织中衰老相关核形态进行深度学习评估以预测未来患乳腺癌风险:一项回顾性队列研究

Deep learning assessment of senescence-associated nuclear morphologies in mammary tissue from healthy female donors to predict future risk of breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Heckenbach Indra, Powell Mark, Fuller Sophia, Henry Jill, Rysdyk Sam, Cui Jenny, Teklu Amanuel Abraha, Verdin Eric, Benz Christopher, Scheibye-Knudsen Morten

机构信息

Center for Healthy Aging, Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA, USA.

Buck Institute for Research on Aging, Novato, CA, USA; Zero Breast Cancer, San Rafael, CA, USA.

出版信息

Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Oct;6(10):e681-e690. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00150-X.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cellular senescence has been associated with cancer as either a barrier mechanism restricting autonomous cell proliferation or a tumour-promoting microenvironmental mechanism that secretes proinflammatory paracrine factors. With most work done in non-human models and the heterogeneous nature of senescence, the precise role of senescent cells in the development of cancer in humans is not well understood. Furthermore, more than 1 million non-malignant breast biopsies are taken every year that could be a major resource for risk stratification. We aimed to explore the clinical relevance for breast cancer development of markers of senescence in mammary tissue from healthy female donors.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we applied single-cell deep learning senescence predictors, based on nuclear morphology, to histological images of haematoxylin and eosin-stained breast biopsy samples from healthy female donors at the Komen Tissue Bank (KTB) at the Indiana University Simon Cancer Center (Indianapolis, IN, USA). All KTB participants (aged ≥18 years) who underwent core biopsies for research purposes between 2009 and 2019 were eligible for the study. Senescence was predicted in the epithelial (terminal duct lobular units [TDLUs] and non-TDLU epithelium), stromal, and adipose tissue compartments using validated models, previously trained on cells induced to senescence by ionising radiation (IR), replicative exhaustion (or replicative senescence; RS), or antimycin A, atazanavir-ritonavir, and doxorubicin (AAD) exposures. To benchmark our senescence-based cancer prediction results, we generated 5-year Gail scores-the current clinical gold standard for breast cancer risk prediction-for participants aged 35 years and older on the basis of characteristics at the time of tissue donation. The primary outcome was estimated odds of breast cancer via logistic modelling for each tissue compartment based on predicted senescence scores in cases (participants who had been diagnosed with breast cancer as of data cutoff, July 31, 2022) and controls (those who had not been diagnosed with breast cancer).

FINDINGS

4382 female donors (median age at donation 45 years [IQR 34-57]) were eligible for the study. As of data cutoff (median follow-up of 10 years [7-11]), 86 (2·0%) had developed breast cancer a mean of 4·8 years (SD 2·84) after date of donation and 4296 (98·0%) had not received a breast cancer diagnosis. Among the 86 cases, we found significant differences in adipose-specific IR and AAD senescence prediction scores compared with controls. Risk analysis showed that individuals in the upper half (above the median) of scores for the adipose tissue IR model had higher odds of developing breast cancer (odds ratio [OR] 1·71 [95% CI 1·10-2·68]; p=0·019), whereas the adipose AAD model revealed a reduced odds of developing breast cancer (OR 0·57 [0·36-0·88]; p=0·013). For the other tissue compartments and the RS model, no significant associations were found (except for stromal tissue via the IR model, had higher odds of developing breast cancer [OR 1·59, 1·03-2·49]). Individuals with both of the adipose risk factors had an OR of 3·32 (1·68-7·03; p=0·0009). Participants with 5-year Gail scores above the median had an OR for development of cancer of 2·33 (1·46-3·82; p=0·0012) compared with those with scores below the median. When combining Gail scores with our adipose AAD risk model, we found that individuals with both of these predictors had an OR of 4·70 (2·29-10·90; p<0·0001). When combining the Gail score with our adipose IR model, we found that individuals with both predictors had an OR of 3·45 (1·77-7·24; p=0·0002).

INTERPRETATION

Assessment of senescence-associated nuclear morphologies with deep learning allows prediction of future cancer risk from normal breast biopsy samples. The combination of multiple models improved prediction of future breast cancer compared with the current clinical benchmark, the Gail model. Our results suggest an important role for microscope image-based deep learning models in predicting future cancer development. Such models could be incorporated into current breast cancer risk assessment and screening protocols.

FUNDING

Novo Nordisk Foundation, Danish Cancer Society, and the US National Institutes of Health.

摘要

背景

细胞衰老与癌症的关系,既体现在作为限制细胞自主增殖的屏障机制,也体现在作为分泌促炎旁分泌因子的肿瘤促进微环境机制。由于大多数研究工作是在非人类模型中进行的,且衰老具有异质性,因此衰老细胞在人类癌症发生中的精确作用尚未完全明确。此外,每年有超过100万例非恶性乳腺活检,这可能是进行风险分层的主要资源。我们旨在探讨健康女性供体乳腺组织中衰老标志物与乳腺癌发生的临床相关性。

方法

在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们将基于核形态学的单细胞深度学习衰老预测模型应用于美国印第安纳大学西蒙癌症中心(印第安纳波利斯,IN)科门组织库(KTB)中健康女性供体的苏木精和伊红染色乳腺活检样本的组织学图像。2009年至2019年间因研究目的接受核心活检的所有KTB参与者(年龄≥18岁)均符合本研究条件。使用经过验证的模型预测上皮组织(终末导管小叶单位[TDLUs]和非TDLU上皮)、基质组织和脂肪组织中的衰老情况,这些模型先前是在受到电离辐射(IR)、复制性耗竭(或复制性衰老;RS)或抗霉素A、阿扎那韦 - 利托那韦和多柔比星(AAD)处理而诱导衰老的细胞上进行训练的。为了将基于衰老的癌症预测结果作为基准,我们根据组织捐赠时的特征,为35岁及以上的参与者生成了5年盖尔评分——目前乳腺癌风险预测的临床金标准。主要结局是通过逻辑回归模型,根据病例(截至2022年7月31日数据截止时已被诊断为乳腺癌的参与者)和对照(未被诊断为乳腺癌的参与者)的预测衰老评分,估计每个组织区域患乳腺癌的几率。

研究结果

4382名女性供体(捐赠时的中位年龄为45岁[IQR 34 - 57])符合研究条件。截至数据截止(中位随访10年[7 - 11]),86名(2.0%)在捐赠后平均4.8年(标准差2.84)患乳腺癌,4296名(98.0%)未被诊断出患有乳腺癌。在86例病例中,我们发现脂肪组织特异性IR和AAD衰老预测评分与对照组相比存在显著差异。风险分析表明,脂肪组织IR模型评分上半部分(高于中位数)的个体患乳腺癌的几率更高(优势比[OR] 1.71 [95% CI 1.10 - 2.68];p = 0.019),而脂肪AAD模型显示患乳腺癌的几率降低(OR 0.57 [0.36 - 0.88];p = 0.013)。对于其他组织区域和RS模型,未发现显著关联(除了通过IR模型的基质组织,患乳腺癌的几率更高[OR 1.59,1.03 - 2.49])。具有两种脂肪风险因素的个体的OR为3.32(1.68 - 7.03;p = 0.0009)。5年盖尔评分高于中位数的参与者患癌的OR为2.33(1.46 - 3.82;p = 0.0012),而评分低于中位数的参与者。当将盖尔评分与我们的脂肪AAD风险模型相结合时,我们发现同时具有这两种预测因素的个体的OR为4.70(2.29 - 10.90;p < 0.0001)。当将盖尔评分与我们的脂肪IR模型相结合时,我们发现同时具有这两种预测因素的个体的OR为3.4

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验