Department of Community Health, Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 13200 Kepala Batas, Pulau Pinang, Minden, Malaysia.
Department of Rehabilitation, Third affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Mogan Road, Hangzhou, 310005, China.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):2638. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20076-w.
The Knowledge-Attitude-Practice (KAP) Questionnaire could help investigate whether there are misconceptions, positive attitudes, and adequate practice in people with gout about exercise and exergames. The study aims to develop and validate the KAP questionnaire regarding exercise and exergames for obese patients with gout to understand gout 'patients' awareness level of exercise and perception of exergames. The development and validation of the questionnaire involved two phases: (1) development of the instrument and (2) judgment of the instrument through calculating the content validity by the expert panel and using SPSS version 28 to examine the test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and structural validity of the instrument. After the first phase of instrument development, an initial questionnaire consisting of six parts with 35 items was identified. After the content validation of the second phase, 11 items with a content validity ratio (CVR) value below 0.99 were eliminated, 3 items were rephrased, 2 items that mixed two statements were divided, and 15 items were added based on the original instrument. In addition, in the factor analysis, five items within the knowledge domain with factor loadings below 0.4 were removed. The final questionnaire was examined and demonstrated acceptable content validity, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity.
知识-态度-实践(KAP)问卷可以帮助调查痛风患者对运动和健身游戏的运动的误解、积极态度和足够的实践。本研究旨在开发和验证针对肥胖痛风患者的运动和健身游戏的 KAP 问卷,以了解痛风患者对运动的认识水平和对健身游戏的认知。问卷的开发和验证包括两个阶段:(1)仪器的开发,(2)通过专家小组计算内容有效性和使用 SPSS 版本 28 来评估仪器的重测信度、内部一致性和结构有效性来判断仪器。在仪器开发的第一阶段之后,确定了一个由六部分组成的初始问卷,共 35 个项目。在第二阶段的内容验证之后,有 11 个内容有效性比值(CVR)值低于 0.99 的项目被删除,3 个项目被重新表述,2 个混合了两个陈述的项目被分开,基于原始仪器添加了 15 个项目。此外,在因子分析中,知识领域内的五个项目的因子负荷低于 0.4 被删除。最终的问卷经过检验,具有可接受的内容有效性、重测信度、内部一致性和结构有效性。