• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

信度和效度:医学研究中的重要性。

Reliability and validity: Importance in Medical Research.

机构信息

Al-Nafees Medical College,Isra University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Fauji Foundation Hospital, Foundation University Medical College, Islamabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Oct;71(10):2401-2406. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.06-861.

DOI:10.47391/JPMA.06-861
PMID:34974579
Abstract

Reliability and validity are among the most important and fundamental domains in the assessment of any measuring methodology for data-collection in a good research. Validity is about what an instrument measures and how well it does so, whereas reliability concerns the truthfulness in the data obtained and the degree to which any measuring tool controls random error. The current narrative review was planned to discuss the importance of reliability and validity of data-collection or measurement techniques used in research. It describes and explores comprehensively the reliability and validity of research instruments and also discusses different forms of reliability and validity with concise examples. An attempt has been taken to give a brief literature review regarding the significance of reliability and validity in medical sciences.

摘要

信度和效度是评估任何数据收集测量方法的重要且基本的领域之一,这对于良好的研究至关重要。效度是指工具测量的内容以及它的测量效果如何,而信度则涉及到所获得数据的真实性以及任何测量工具控制随机误差的程度。本次叙述性综述旨在讨论数据收集或测量技术在研究中的可靠性和有效性的重要性。它全面描述和探讨了研究工具的可靠性和有效性,并用简明的例子探讨了不同形式的可靠性和有效性。本文还尝试简要综述了医学科学中可靠性和有效性的重要性。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity: Importance in Medical Research.信度和效度:医学研究中的重要性。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Oct;71(10):2401-2406. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.06-861.
2
Principles and methods of validity and reliability testing of questionnaires used in social and health science researches.社会与健康科学研究中问卷效度与信度测试的原则和方法
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015 Oct-Dec;22(4):195-201. doi: 10.4103/1117-1936.173959.
3
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
4
Evaluation of research studies. Part IV: Validity and reliability--concepts and application.研究性研究的评估。第四部分:效度与信度——概念与应用。
J Nurse Midwifery. 1993 Mar-Apr;38(2):121-5. doi: 10.1016/0091-2182(93)90146-8.
5
Validity and reliability of measurement instruments used in research.研究中使用的测量工具的有效性和可靠性。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Dec 1;65(23):2276-84. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070364.
6
[Psychometric characteristics of questionnaires designed to assess the knowledge, perceptions and practices of health care professionals with regards to alcoholic patients].[旨在评估医护人员对酒精依赖患者的知识、认知及实践情况的调查问卷的心理测量学特征]
Encephale. 2004 Sep-Oct;30(5):437-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95458-9.
7
Reliability and Validity of Physical Tools and Measurement Methods to Quantify Hand Swelling: A Systematic Review.手部肿胀物理工具和测量方法的可靠性和有效性:系统评价。
Phys Ther. 2021 Feb 4;101(2). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa206.
8
Direct Observation Assessment of Milestones: Problems with Reliability.里程碑的直接观察评估:可靠性问题。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;16(6):871-6. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.9.27270. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
9
Reliability and validity issues related to interactive tailored patient assessments: a case study.与交互式定制患者评估相关的可靠性和有效性问题:一项案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2007 Aug 1;9(3):e22. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.3.e22.
10
Are reliability, reproducibility and validity the correct terms to assess the correctness of dietary studies?可靠性、可重复性和有效性是评估饮食研究准确性的恰当术语吗?
Nutr Health. 2001;15(1):17-28. doi: 10.1177/026010600101500103.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychometric characteristics of the Chinese version of the patient participation scale.中文版患者参与量表的心理测量学特征
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 28;25(1):2562. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23749-2.
2
Development and validation of a questionnaire for the knowledge assessment and management of PLADO diet in kidney and healthy population in Cyprus.塞浦路斯肾脏疾病患者及健康人群中PLADO饮食知识评估与管理问卷的编制与验证
Front Nutr. 2025 Jul 4;12:1619237. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1619237. eCollection 2025.
3
Validity and reliability of Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS-5) in a Southeastern European population.
药物依从性报告量表(MARS-5)在东南欧人群中的效度和信度
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Jul 15;18(1):2525359. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2025.2525359. eCollection 2025.
4
Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the post-intensive care syndrome questionnaire.重症监护后综合征问卷中文版的翻译与验证
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 11;24(1):906. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03576-x.
5
Psychiatric emergencies: epidemiological analysis and healthcare professionals' experiences.精神科急症:流行病学分析与医护人员的经验
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01268-y.
6
Refining the Quality Indicator Set from the Dutch Audit for Treatment of Obesity to Ensure Usefulness in Clinical Practice.优化荷兰肥胖治疗审计的质量指标集以确保其在临床实践中的实用性。
Obes Surg. 2025 Jul;35(7):2616-2625. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07898-2. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
7
The Road to a Research Database: A Team Approach, Limitless, and Never Ending.通往研究数据库之路:团队协作,无限可能,永无止境。
JACC Case Rep. 2025 May 21;30(11):103366. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2025.103366. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
8
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the older adult lifestyle scale: a translation and validation study.老年人生活方式量表中文版的心理测量学评估:一项翻译与验证研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 28;13:1539685. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1539685. eCollection 2025.
9
Survey research in genetic counseling.遗传咨询中的调查研究。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Jun;34(3):e70049. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70049.
10
Reliability and Clinical Validity of the SARC-Global Questionnaire for Sarcopenia and Sarcopenic Obesity in Spanish Older Adults.西班牙语老年人群中用于评估肌肉减少症和肌肉减少性肥胖的SARC-全球问卷的信度和临床效度
Nutrients. 2025 Mar 29;17(7):1206. doi: 10.3390/nu17071206.