Zink Maria, Pischke Frederike, Wendsche Johannes, Melzer Marlen
Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (BAuA), Dresden, Germany.
Technische Universität Dresden (TUD), Dresden, Germany.
BMC Nurs. 2024 Sep 27;23(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02358-1.
During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, inpatient nurses faced various work stressors. Little is known about organizational interventions that can mitigate the negative consequences of pandemic-related stressors.
The aim was to provide a synopsis of the literature concerning the types and outcomes of organizational interventions performed during the COVID-19 pandemic that directly (re)organized the work structures of inpatient nurses to address pandemic-related work stressors or to increase nurses' ability to cope.
Within this preregistered systematic literature review, we searched four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, CINAHL) and two preprint databases (MedRxiv, PsyArXiv) for interventional studies of organizational interventions published between 01/2020 and 03/2023 (k = 990 records). We included 12 primary studies after title-abstract and full-text screening. A synthesis of results without meta-analysis was conducted. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials - version 2 (RoB-2) and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool.
All interventions were implemented in hospitals. The reasons given for implementation included pandemic-related work stressors such as a high workload, understaffing, and a lack of medical resources. To respond to the various work stressors, half of the studies took a multilevel approach combining organizational and person-oriented interventions (k = 6). Most studies (k = 8) took a secondary prevention approach, focusing on the organization of rest breaks (k = 5). With respect to outcomes, the studies examined nurse-related stress and resilience, turnover intention, job satisfaction, and other factors. Risk-of-bias analyses revealed that conclusions about the effectiveness of the interventions are limited due to confounding factors and self-selection.
The identified interventions provide a basis for future research to draw conclusions on the effectiveness of organizational interventions during pandemics. The promotion of adequate work breaks could be useful if the work stressors associated with strain and negative consequences cannot be changed directly. However, the same stressors (e.g., high workload) can hinder nurses from participating in offered interventions. This emphasizes the importance of directly addressing inpatient nurses' work stressors.
Prospero-ID CRD42023364807 (March 2023).
在2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,住院护士面临各种工作压力源。对于能够减轻与大流行相关压力源负面影响的组织干预措施,我们了解甚少。
本研究旨在综述有关COVID-19大流行期间实施的组织干预措施的类型和结果的文献,这些干预措施直接(重新)组织住院护士的工作结构,以应对与大流行相关的工作压力源或提高护士的应对能力。
在这项预先注册的系统文献综述中,我们检索了四个数据库(PubMed、PsycINFO、PsycARTICLES、CINAHL)和两个预印本数据库(MedRxiv、PsyArXiv),以查找2020年1月至2023年3月期间发表的关于组织干预措施的干预性研究(k = 990条记录)。经过标题摘要和全文筛选,我们纳入了12项主要研究。我们进行了结果综合分析,但未进行荟萃分析。使用Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具第2版(RoB-2)和非随机干预性研究中的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)工具评估偏倚风险。
所有干预措施均在医院实施。实施干预措施的原因包括与大流行相关的工作压力源,如工作量大、人员不足和医疗资源短缺。为应对各种工作压力源,一半的研究采用了多层次方法,将组织层面和以人为本的干预措施相结合(k = 6)。大多数研究(k = 8)采用二级预防方法,重点是安排休息时间(k = 5)。关于结果,这些研究考察了与护士相关的压力和恢复力、离职意愿、工作满意度及其他因素。偏倚风险分析表明,由于混杂因素和自我选择,关于干预措施有效性的结论有限。
已确定的干预措施为未来研究得出关于大流行期间组织干预措施有效性的结论提供了基础。如果与压力和负面后果相关的工作压力源无法直接改变,那么促进充足的工作休息可能会有所帮助。然而,同样的压力源(如工作量大)可能会阻碍护士参与所提供的干预措施。这强调了直接解决住院护士工作压力源的重要性。
Prospero-ID CRD42023364807(2023年3月)