Department of Environmental and Occupational Health and Toxicology, Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec (INSPQ), Montreal, QC H2P 1E2, Canada.
Department of Public Health Gaspésie-Îles-de-la-Madeleine, Integrated Health and Social Services Centre of Gaspésie, Gaspe, QC G4X 1A9, Canada.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9653. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159653.
It is unclear how to effectively protect healthcare workers' mental health during infectious disease epidemics. Targeting the occupational determinants of stress may hold more promise than individual stress management, which has received more focus. Through a systematic review of the 2000-2021 English- and French-language scientific literature, we evaluated the effectiveness of organizational and psychosocial work environment interventions to protect healthcare workers' mental health in an epidemic/pandemic context. Evidence from medium- and high-quality studies was synthesized using GRADE. Among 1604 unique search results, 41 studies were deemed relevant, yielding 34 low-quality and seven medium-quality studies. The latter reported on promising multi-component prevention programs that combined staffing adjustments, work shift arrangements, enhanced infection prevention and control, recognition of workers' efforts, psychological and/or logistic support during lockdowns (e.g., accommodation). Our confidence in the effectiveness of reviewed interventions is low to very low, however, owing to methodological limitations. We highlight gaps in the reporting of intervention process and context elements and discuss theory and implementation failure as possible explanations for results. We conclude by urging authors of future studies to include and document detailed risk assessments of the work environment, involve workers in solution design and implementation and consider how this process can be adapted during an emergency.
在传染病流行期间,如何有效地保护医护人员的心理健康尚不清楚。针对压力的职业决定因素可能比更受关注的个体压力管理更有希望。通过对 2000 年至 2021 年英文和法文科学文献的系统回顾,我们评估了在流行/大流行背景下组织和心理社会工作环境干预措施保护医护人员心理健康的效果。使用 GRADE 对来自中高质量研究的证据进行了综合。在 1604 个独特的搜索结果中,有 41 项研究被认为相关,产生了 34 项低质量和 7 项中等质量的研究。后者报告了有希望的多组分预防计划,这些计划结合了人员配置调整、工作班次安排、加强感染预防和控制、对工人努力的认可、封锁期间的心理和/或后勤支持(例如,住宿)。然而,由于方法学上的限制,我们对所审查干预措施的有效性的信心很低至非常低。我们强调了干预过程和背景要素报告的差距,并讨论了理论和实施失败作为结果的可能解释。最后,我们敦促未来研究的作者包括并记录工作环境的详细风险评估,让工人参与解决方案的设计和实施,并考虑如何在紧急情况下调整这一过程。