• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A study of medical students' experiences at Shiraz University of medical sciences from the implementation of integration in medical education: a qualitative study.一项关于医学生在设拉子医科大学的体验的研究:从医学教育整合实施开始:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1042. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05983-1.
2
Medical students' attitudes on and experiences with evidence-based medicine: a qualitative study.医学生对循证医学的态度及经历:一项定性研究
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Dec;20(6):779-85. doi: 10.1111/jep.12191. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
3
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
4
Program evaluation of an Integrated Basic Science Medical Curriculum in Shiraz Medical School, Using CIPP Evaluation Model.使用CIPP评估模型对设拉子医学院综合基础科学医学课程进行项目评估。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2017 Jul;5(3):148-154.
5
Medical students' attitudes towards early clinical exposure in Iran.伊朗医学生对早期临床接触的态度。
Int J Med Educ. 2016 Jun 19;7:195-9. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5749.78af.
6
Outpatient education, a momentous in clinical education: a qualitative study of medical students', faculty members', and residents' perspectives.门诊教育,临床教育中的重要一环:一项关于医学生、教师和住院医师观点的定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Oct 3;23(1):719. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04694-3.
7
The blacksmith approach: a strategy for teaching and learning in the medical anatomy course (a qualitative study).铁匠教学法:医学解剖课程中的教学策略(一项定性研究)。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Oct 20;22(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03800-1.
8
Why nutrition education is inadequate in the medical curriculum: a qualitative study of students' perspectives on barriers and strategies.医学课程中营养教育为何不足:学生视角下的障碍和策略的定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Feb 12;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1130-5.
9
A Case Based-Shared Teaching Approach in Undergraduate Medical Curriculum: A Way for Integration in Basic and Clinical Sciences.本科医学课程中基于案例的共享教学方法:基础科学与临床科学整合之路
Acta Med Iran. 2017 Apr;55(4):259-264.
10
Enhancing academic performance: a shadow curriculum approach for medical and dental student preparation in basic sciences and pre-internship comprehensive exams.提高学业成绩:医学和牙科学生在基础科学和实习前综合考试中准备的隐性课程方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):1112. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06089-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Persistence of changed attitudes among students in an integrated anatomy curriculum.整合解剖课程中学生改变态度的持续存在。
Anat Sci Educ. 2024 Jul-Aug;17(5):998-1011. doi: 10.1002/ase.2414. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
2
Radical reform of the undergraduate medical education program in a developing country: the Egyptian experience.发展中国家本科医学教育计划的彻底改革:埃及的经验。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Mar 3;23(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04098-3.
3
The blacksmith approach: a strategy for teaching and learning in the medical anatomy course (a qualitative study).铁匠教学法:医学解剖课程中的教学策略(一项定性研究)。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Oct 20;22(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03800-1.
4
Vertical integration in medical education: the broader perspective.医学教育中的垂直整合:更广阔的视角。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 14;20(1):509. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02433-6.
5
Integration in Medical Education.医学教育中的整合
Indian Pediatr. 2020 Sep 15;57(9):842-847.
6
A prospective study evaluating the integration of a multifaceted evidence-based medicine curriculum into early years in an undergraduate medical school.一项前瞻性研究,评估将多方面循证医学课程融入本科医学院早期阶段的情况。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Aug 24;20(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02140-2.
7
A Review of the Quality Indicators of Rigor in Qualitative Research.一项关于定性研究严谨性质量指标的综述。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jan;84(1):7120. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7120.
8
Integrating the basic sciences in medical curricula: focus on the basic scientists.将基础科学整合到医学课程中:关注基础科学家。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2020 Jun 1;44(2):119-123. doi: 10.1152/advan.00172.2019.
9
Curriculum integration: From Ladder to Ludo.课程整合:从阶梯到鲁多游戏。
Med Teach. 2020 Dec;42(12):1421-1423. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1707176. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
10
Using SPICES educational strategy for undergraduate curricular reform at Shiraz Medical School.在设拉子医学院采用SPICES教育策略进行本科课程改革。
Med Teach. 2019 Sep;41(9):1091. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1582759. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

一项关于医学生在设拉子医科大学的体验的研究:从医学教育整合实施开始:一项定性研究。

A study of medical students' experiences at Shiraz University of medical sciences from the implementation of integration in medical education: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Department of E-Learning in Medical Sciences, Virtual School & Center of Excellence in E-Learning, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Department of Medical Education, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1042. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05983-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-024-05983-1
PMID:39334242
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11430523/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The basic science course is the foundation of medical knowledge, and how and in what form the teaching of this course is a vital issue. A successful curriculum should include everything medical students need in their future careers. Basic science education should be such that students clearly understand the relationship between the content and its application in clinical practice. Therefore, the need to change the curriculum of the general medicine course, especially course of the Basic science, in content and layout in an integrated way is felt more than before. This study was designed to explain the experiences of medical students from the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences since the implementation of integration in 2020.

METHODS

The present study was qualitative research with a conventional content analysis method. Participants were selected for the interview purposefully. They included 12 Medical students from basic and clinical sciences and 5 faculty members. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and the content analysis method. Four methods of Goba and Lincoln were used to evaluate the accuracy of the data.

RESULTS

After summarizing and analyzing the data, 221 codes were extracted. They were divided into seven subcategories and finally, three main themes including Enjoyable experiences (advantages of the integration system), Upsetting experiences (Disadvantages of the integration system), Resolutions to solving integration problems were extracted. Generally, the findings indicated a positive evaluation of medical students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences from the integration system, and they stated that the integration causes an interaction between basic and clinical sciences and also increases students' motivation.

CONCLUSION

The findings indicated a positive evaluation of Shiraz's medical students of the integrated system. According to the results of this research, it can be said; that the use of integration horizontally and vertically in medical education improves the quality of education compared to traditional methods. The integration of basic and clinical science is important in the sense that can be a powerful tool for learning and acquiring skills, also, it can also help in the promotion of professional development of students and motivate them to study more in interactive manner and be loyal to lifelong learning. study generally showed that combining theoretical and practical courses has advantages and disadvantages, but its advantages are more. Paying attention to the shortcomings, especially in the supply of human resources and professors, and reforming the program with continuous revision are issues that education managers and medical educators of the general medical practice should address.

摘要

背景

基础科学课程是医学知识的基础,如何以及以何种形式教授这门课程是一个至关重要的问题。成功的课程应包含医学生未来职业生涯所需的一切。基础科学教育应使学生清楚地理解内容与其在临床实践中的应用之间的关系。因此,人们越来越感到需要以综合的方式改变普通医学课程,尤其是基础科学课程的课程内容和结构。本研究旨在解释自 2020 年实施综合课程以来,来自设拉子医科大学的医学生的经验。

方法

本研究为定性研究,采用常规内容分析法。通过有目的地访谈选择参与者。他们包括来自基础和临床科学的 12 名医学生和 5 名教师。通过半结构化访谈和内容分析法收集数据。采用 Goba 和 Lincoln 的四种方法评估数据的准确性。

结果

在总结和分析数据后,提取了 221 个代码。它们被分为七个亚类,最终提取了三个主题,包括愉快的经验(整合系统的优势)、烦恼的经验(整合系统的劣势)和解决整合问题的决议。总的来说,研究结果表明,设拉子医科大学的医学生对综合系统的评价是积极的,他们表示整合系统会引起基础科学和临床科学之间的互动,也会提高学生的学习动机。

结论

研究结果表明,设拉子医科大学的医学生对综合系统的评价是积极的。根据这项研究的结果可以说;在医学教育中横向和纵向地使用整合比传统方法提高了教育质量。基础科学和临床科学的整合在理论和实践课程的结合有其优点和缺点,但优点更多。关注缺点,特别是在人力资源和教授的供应方面,并通过不断修订来改革课程,这些都是普通医学实践的教育管理者和医学教育者应该关注的问题。