Flores-Medina Yvonne, Ávila Bretherton Regina, Ramírez-Bermudez Jesús, Saracco-Alvarez Ricardo, Flores-Ramos Monica
Subdirección de Investigaciones Clínicas, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría, Mexico City 14370, Mexico.
Dirección de Servicios Clínicos, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría, Mexico City 14370, Mexico.
Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 29;14(9):872. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14090872.
A two-factor account has been proposed as an explanatory model for the formation and maintenance of delusions. The first factor refers to a neurocognitive process leading to a significant change in subjective experience; the second factor has been regarded as a failure in hypothesis evaluation characterized by an impairment in metacognitive ability. This study was focused on the assessment of metacognition in patients with schizophrenia. The aims of the study were to measure the overconfidence in metacognitive judgments through the prediction of word list recall and to analyze the correlation between basic neurocognition (memory and executive function) and metacognition through a metamemory test and the severity of psychotic symptoms.
Fifty-one participants with a diagnosis of schizophrenia were evaluated. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) was used to assess the severity of psychiatric symptoms, and the subtest of metamemory included in the Executive Functions and Frontal Lobe-2 battery (BANFE-2) was used to evaluate overconfidence and underestimation errors, intrusion and perseverative response, total volume of recall, and Brief Functioning Assessment Scale (FAST) for social functioning.
The strongest correlation is observed between overconfidence errors and the positive factor of the PANSS (r = 0.774, < 0.001). For the enter model in the multiple linear regression (r = 0.78, r = 0.61; F = 24.57, < 0.001), the only significant predictor was overconfidence errors.
Our results highlight the relevance of a metacognitive bias of overconfidence, strongly correlated with psychotic symptoms, and support the hypothesis that metacognitive defects contribute to the failure to reject contradictory evidence. From our perspective, these findings align with current mechanistic models of schizophrenia that focus on the role of the prefrontal cortex.
双因素理论已被提出作为妄想形成和维持的一种解释模型。第一个因素是指导致主观体验发生重大变化的神经认知过程;第二个因素被认为是假设评估失败,其特征是元认知能力受损。本研究聚焦于精神分裂症患者元认知的评估。该研究的目的是通过预测单词列表回忆来测量元认知判断中的过度自信,并通过元记忆测试以及分析基本神经认知(记忆和执行功能)与元认知之间的相关性以及精神病症状的严重程度。
对51名诊断为精神分裂症的参与者进行评估。使用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)评估精神症状的严重程度,并使用执行功能和额叶-2电池(BANFE-2)中包含的元记忆子测试来评估过度自信和低估错误、侵入和持续反应、回忆总量以及社会功能的简要功能评估量表(FAST)。
在过度自信错误与PANSS的阳性因子之间观察到最强的相关性(r = 0.774,< 0.001)。对于多元线性回归中的进入模型(r = 0.78,r = 0.61;F = 24.57,< 0.001),唯一显著的预测因子是过度自信错误。
我们的结果突出了过度自信的元认知偏差的相关性,其与精神病症状密切相关,并支持元认知缺陷导致无法拒绝矛盾证据这一假设。从我们的角度来看,这些发现与当前关注前额叶皮质作用的精神分裂症机制模型相一致。