Suppr超能文献

纤维肌痛综合征内源性疼痛调制变化与临床改善之间的联系:一项Meta回归分析

The Link between Endogenous Pain Modulation Changes and Clinical Improvement in Fibromyalgia Syndrome: A Meta-Regression Analysis.

作者信息

Pacheco-Barrios Kevin, Filardi Rafaela Machado, González-González Luis Fernando, Park Nayeon, Petrus Fernanda Queiroz, Navarro-Flores Alba, Di-Bonaventura Silvia, Alves Luana Gola, Queiroz Fernanda, Fregni Felipe

机构信息

Neuromodulation Center and Center for Clinical Research Learning, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Unidad de Investigación para la Generación y Síntesis de Evidencias en Salud, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima 15023, Peru.

出版信息

Biomedicines. 2024 Sep 13;12(9):2097. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12092097.

Abstract

Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and temporal summation (TS) tests can measure the ability to inhibit pain in fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) patients and its level of pain sensitization, respectively. However, their clinical validity is still unclear. We studied the association between changes in the CPM and TS tests and the clinical improvement of FMS patients who received therapeutic intervention. We systematically searched for FMS randomized clinical trials with data on therapeutic interventions comparing clinical improvement (pain intensity and symptom severity reduction), CPM, and TS changes relative to control interventions. To study the relationship between TS/CPM and clinical measures, we performed a meta-regression analysis to calculate odds ratios. We included nine studies (484 participants). We found no significant changes in TS or CPM by studying all the interventions together. Our findings show that this lack of difference is likely because pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions resulted in contrary effects. Non-pharmacological interventions, such as non-invasive neuromodulation, showed the largest effects normalizing CPM/TS. Meta-regression was significantly associated with pain reduction and symptom severity improvement with normalization of TS and CPM. We demonstrate an association between clinical improvement and TS/CPM normalization in FMS patients. Thus, the TS and CPM tests could be surrogate biomarkers in FMS management. Recovering defective endogenous pain modulation mechanisms by targeted non-pharmacological interventions may help establish long-term clinical recovery in FMS patients.

摘要

条件性疼痛调制(CPM)和时间总和(TS)测试分别可以测量纤维肌痛综合征(FMS)患者抑制疼痛的能力及其疼痛敏化程度。然而,它们的临床有效性仍不明确。我们研究了CPM和TS测试的变化与接受治疗干预的FMS患者临床改善之间的关联。我们系统检索了有关治疗干预数据的FMS随机临床试验,比较了相对于对照干预的临床改善(疼痛强度和症状严重程度降低)、CPM和TS变化。为了研究TS/CPM与临床指标之间的关系,我们进行了meta回归分析以计算优势比。我们纳入了9项研究(484名参与者)。通过对所有干预措施进行综合研究,我们发现TS或CPM没有显著变化。我们的研究结果表明,这种差异的缺乏可能是因为药物和非药物干预产生了相反的效果。非药物干预,如非侵入性神经调节,在使CPM/TS正常化方面显示出最大的效果。meta回归与TS和CPM正常化后的疼痛减轻和症状严重程度改善显著相关。我们证明了FMS患者的临床改善与TS/CPM正常化之间存在关联。因此,TS和CPM测试可能是FMS管理中的替代生物标志物。通过有针对性的非药物干预恢复有缺陷的内源性疼痛调制机制可能有助于FMS患者实现长期临床康复。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e3ec/11428716/b95ab12d7ee7/biomedicines-12-02097-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验