Bruun Karin Due, Christensen Robin, Amris Kirstine, Blichfeldt-Eckhardt Morten Rune, Bye-Møller Lars, Henriksen Marius, Alkjaer Tine, Toft Palle, Holsgaard-Larsen Anders, Vaegter Henrik Bjarke
Pain Research Group, Pain Center, Odense University Hospital, Heden 9, 5000, Odense C, Denmark.
Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
CNS Drugs. 2025 Apr 11. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01183-7.
The widespread pain and muscular fatigue characteristics of fibromyalgia are believed to be mediated by central mechanisms. Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) has emerged as a new treatment option for fibromyalgia, possibly modulating central mechanisms via glial or opioid receptors.
In the randomized, placebo-controlled FINAL trial, 99 women with fibromyalgia were treated with LDN or placebo for 12 weeks. In this secondary analysis, we examined the potential effects of LDN versus placebo on changes from baseline in pain tolerance, temporal summation of pain, and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in the complete case population (45 versus 47 participants). Measures of muscular fatigue were evaluated using the 30-s chair stand test and a shoulder abduction test.
Of the five examined outcomes, only change in CPM showed a significant between-group difference with greater enhancement following LDN treatment (2.0 kPa; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-3.7 kPa) compared with placebo. Within-group changes in CPM showed an increase of 1.2 kPa (95% CI 0.05-2.4 kPa) in the LDN group and a possible decrease of 0.8 kPa (95% CI - 1.9 to 0.4 kPa) in the placebo group.
We found a significant between-group difference in CPM change in favor of LDN. However, this difference was partly explained by a decrease in CPM in the placebo group. Sensitivity analyses showed no association between changes in CPM and clinical pain improvement, suggesting that the group-difference in CPM is a random finding.
ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT0427877; registered on 30 January 2020).
纤维肌痛广泛的疼痛和肌肉疲劳特征被认为是由中枢机制介导的。低剂量纳曲酮(LDN)已成为纤维肌痛的一种新治疗选择,可能通过胶质细胞或阿片受体调节中枢机制。
在随机、安慰剂对照的FINAL试验中,99名纤维肌痛女性接受了LDN或安慰剂治疗12周。在这项二次分析中,我们在完整病例人群(45名与47名参与者)中研究了LDN与安慰剂对疼痛耐受性、疼痛时间总和以及条件性疼痛调制(CPM)相对于基线变化的潜在影响。使用30秒椅子站立试验和肩部外展试验评估肌肉疲劳指标。
在所检查的五项结果中,只有CPM的变化显示出显著的组间差异,与安慰剂相比,LDN治疗后增强更大(2.0 kPa;95%置信区间(CI)0.4 - 3.7 kPa)。LDN组内CPM的变化显示增加了1.2 kPa(95% CI 0.05 - 2.4 kPa),而安慰剂组可能减少了0.8 kPa(95% CI -1.9至0.4 kPa)。
我们发现CPM变化存在显著的组间差异,有利于LDN。然而,这种差异部分是由安慰剂组CPM的降低所解释的。敏感性分析显示CPM变化与临床疼痛改善之间无关联,表明CPM的组间差异是一个随机发现。
ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT0427877;于2020年1月30日注册)。