• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估和比较解剖学鼻烟窝与常规桡动脉在冠状动脉造影前的远端桡动脉直径。

Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.

Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

Indian Heart J. 2022 Jul-Aug;74(4):322-326. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ihj.2022.06.007
PMID:35728657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9453060/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The distal radial artery (dRA) approach at anatomical snuff box has gained attention of the interventional cardiologist in last few years. The procedural success rate by this novel approach depends on size of the radial artery and therefore the study was planned to study the size of distal radial artery.

METHODS

Total of 1004 patients of >18 years of age undergoing coronary catheterization were included in the study. The vessel diameter was measured from media to media in the anatomical snuff box a day prior to coronary catheterization.

RESULTS

The mean diameter of right radial artery at conventional access site was 2.56 ± 0.35 mm and at distal access site 2.23 ± 0.39 mm (p < 0.001). Females had significantly smaller radial artery diameter as compared to males at right conventional access site (2.42 ± 0.36 mm vs 2.60 ± 0.34 mm; p < 0.001) and distal access site (2.09 ± 0.38 mm vs 2.27 ± 0.39 mm; p < 0.001). The diameter of the right dRA was not significantly correlated with age (r linear = 0.002, p = 0.0475) but was positively correlated with height and weight (r linear = 0.076, p = <0.001 and r linear = 0.005, p = <0.001) and negatively correlated with BMI (r linear = 0.076, p = 0.519).

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown the size of right dRA 2.27 + 0.39 mm in males and 2.09 + 0.38 mm in females. Diabetes, hypertension, height and weight are important predictors of dRA diameter.

摘要

背景

近年来,解剖学鼻烟窝处的远端桡动脉(dRA)入路引起了介入心脏病学家的关注。这种新方法的手术成功率取决于桡动脉的大小,因此该研究旨在研究远端桡动脉的大小。

方法

本研究共纳入 1004 例年龄>18 岁的行冠状动脉造影术的患者。在冠状动脉造影术前一天,在解剖学鼻烟窝处从动脉壁至动脉壁测量血管直径。

结果

右侧桡动脉常规入路的平均直径为 2.56±0.35mm,远端入路为 2.23±0.39mm(p<0.001)。与男性相比,女性右侧桡动脉常规入路(2.42±0.36mm vs 2.60±0.34mm;p<0.001)和远端入路(2.09±0.38mm vs 2.27±0.39mm;p<0.001)的桡动脉直径明显更小。右侧 dRA 的直径与年龄无明显相关性(r 线性=0.002,p=0.0475),但与身高和体重呈正相关(r 线性=0.076,p<0.001 和 r 线性=0.005,p<0.001),与 BMI 呈负相关(r 线性=0.076,p=0.519)。

结论

本研究显示男性右侧 dRA 的直径为 2.27±0.39mm,女性为 2.09±0.38mm。糖尿病、高血压、身高和体重是 dRA 直径的重要预测因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7837/9453060/0f0276e87da6/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7837/9453060/b1666a2feef9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7837/9453060/739dbb5e0e84/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7837/9453060/a3093c776539/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7837/9453060/0f0276e87da6/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7837/9453060/b1666a2feef9/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7837/9453060/739dbb5e0e84/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7837/9453060/a3093c776539/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7837/9453060/0f0276e87da6/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessment and comparison of distal radial artery diameter in anatomical snuff box with conventional radial artery before coronary catheterization.评估和比较解剖学鼻烟窝与常规桡动脉在冠状动脉造影前的远端桡动脉直径。
Indian Heart J. 2022 Jul-Aug;74(4):322-326. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
2
Importance of measurement of the diameter of the distal radial artery in a distal radial approach from the anatomical snuffbox before coronary catheterization.在冠状动脉导管插入术前,经解剖鼻烟壶采用桡动脉远端入路时测量桡动脉远端直径的重要性。
Heart Vessels. 2019 Oct;34(10):1615-1620. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01404-2. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
3
Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients.在日本患者中使用超声评估鼻烟窝处桡动脉远端的直径。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 Oct;34(4):312-316. doi: 10.1007/s12928-018-00567-5. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
4
Anatomical snuff box approach for percutaneous coronary interventions - Current status.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的解剖鼻烟盒入路——现状。
Indian Heart J. 2021 Sep-Oct;73(5):539-543. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2021.08.007. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
5
The distal left radial artery access for coronary angiography and intervention: A new era.用于冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的左桡动脉远端入路:一个新时代。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Dec;19(8S):35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
6
Distal Versus Proximal Radial Artery Access for Cardiac Catheterization: 30-Day Outcomes of the DIPRA Study.经桡动脉入路的远端桡动脉与近端桡动脉在心脏导管插入术:DIPRA 研究的 30 天结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Nov 7;12(21):e030774. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.030774. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
7
Distal Versus Proximal Radial Artery Access for Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention: Design and Rationale of the DIPRA Trial.经桡动脉入路的远端桡动脉与近端桡动脉在心脏导管检查和介入治疗中的比较:DIPRA 试验的设计和原理。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Feb;35:104-109. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
8
Analysis of the diameter of the distal radial artery at anatomic snuffbox by ultrasonography in patients scheduled for coronary intervention.对计划进行冠状动脉介入治疗的患者,通过超声检查分析解剖鼻烟窝处桡动脉远端的直径。
J Vasc Access. 2025 May;26(3):896-903. doi: 10.1177/11297298241250263. Epub 2024 May 16.
9
Distal Radial Artery Access in comparison to Forearm Radial Artery Access for Cardiac Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial (DARFORA Trial).经桡动脉(尺骨茎突附近)途径入路与经前臂桡动脉途径入路行心导管术的对比:一项随机对照试验(DARFORA 试验)。
J Interv Cardiol. 2022 Jul 15;2022:7698583. doi: 10.1155/2022/7698583. eCollection 2022.
10
Distal versus conventional radial artery access for coronary catheterization: A systematic review and meta-analysis.冠状动脉造影中远端桡动脉入路与传统桡动脉入路的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Mar;101(4):722-736. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30602. Epub 2023 Feb 19.

引用本文的文献

1
"Distal radial first": feasibility and safety for coronary angiography and PCI in Australia.桡动脉远端优先:澳大利亚冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性与安全性
AsiaIntervention. 2025 Mar 20;11(1):35-43. doi: 10.4244/AIJ-D-24-00036. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Impact of Anthropometric Measures on Distal vs Conventional Radial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Procedures.人体测量指标对经皮冠状动脉介入手术中桡动脉远心端与传统入路的影响。
JACC Adv. 2025 Jan 13;4(2):101565. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101565. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Distal Transradial Access Optimization: A Prospective Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Radial Artery Characterization for the Anatomical Snuffbox.

本文引用的文献

1
Distal Radial Artery Approach to Prevent Radial Artery Occlusion Trial.桡动脉远端入路预防桡动脉闭塞试验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 22;14(4):378-385. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.013.
2
Access-site Complications of the Transradial Approach: Rare But Still There.经桡动脉入路的并发症:虽罕见但仍存在。
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17(3):279-293. doi: 10.2174/1573403X16999200819101923.
3
A comparison of the clinical effects and safety between the distal radial artery and the classic radial artery approaches in percutaneous coronary intervention.
桡动脉远端入路优化:一项针对解剖鼻烟壶区超声引导下桡动脉特征分析的前瞻性试验。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 20;14(18):2081. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14182081.
4
Is catheterization via distal transradial access feasible in children? From vessel diameter perspective.经远端桡动脉途径进行导管插入术在儿童中可行吗?从血管直径角度来看。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Aug 2;11:1428083. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1428083. eCollection 2024.
5
Increasing the sensor channels: a solution for the pressing offsets that cause the physiological parameter inaccuracy in radial artery pulse signal acquisition.增加传感器通道:解决导致桡动脉脉搏信号采集中生理参数不准确的紧迫偏移问题的一种方法。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Feb 15;12:1359297. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1359297. eCollection 2024.
6
The Role of Ultrasound in Accessing the Distal Radial Artery at the Anatomical Snuffbox for Cardiovascular Interventions.超声在心血管介入中经解剖学鼻烟窝处穿刺桡动脉远心端的作用。
Life (Basel). 2022 Dec 22;13(1):25. doi: 10.3390/life13010025.
7
Application of ultrasound in cardiovascular intervention the distal radial artery approach: New wine in old bottles?超声在心血管介入中的应用——桡动脉远端入路:旧瓶装新酒?
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 15;9:1019053. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1019053. eCollection 2022.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中桡动脉远心端与经典桡动脉入路的临床效果及安全性比较。
Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Sep;9(5):2568-2574. doi: 10.21037/apm-19-479. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
4
Left Distal Transradial Access (ldTRA): A Comparative Assessment of Conventional and Distal Radial Artery Size.左侧远端经桡动脉入路(ldTRA):常规桡动脉远端和桡动脉大小的比较评估。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020 Jun;43(6):850-857. doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02485-7. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
5
Distal Versus Conventional Transradial Artery Access for Coronary Angiography and Intervention: A Meta-Analysis.经桡动脉入路(远段 vs. 常规)行冠状动脉造影和介入治疗的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Oct;21(10):1209-1213. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2020.03.020. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
6
Feasibility of primary percutaneous coronary intervention via the distal radial approach in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.经远端桡动脉入路行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗对 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的可行性。
Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(Suppl 1):S53-S61. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2019.420. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
7
Importance of measurement of the diameter of the distal radial artery in a distal radial approach from the anatomical snuffbox before coronary catheterization.在冠状动脉导管插入术前,经解剖鼻烟壶采用桡动脉远端入路时测量桡动脉远端直径的重要性。
Heart Vessels. 2019 Oct;34(10):1615-1620. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01404-2. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
8
Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Two-Stent Technique for Unprotected True Left Main Bifurcation Lesion Via Left Snuffbox Approach.经左鼻烟窝入路采用双支架技术成功行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗无保护的真性左主干分叉病变
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Mar;31(3):E55. doi: 10.25270/jic/18.00266.
9
Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuff box using ultrasound in Japanese patients.在日本患者中使用超声评估鼻烟窝处桡动脉远端的直径。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2019 Oct;34(4):312-316. doi: 10.1007/s12928-018-00567-5. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
10
Gender differences in the distal radial artery diameter for the snuffbox approach.鼻烟窝入路时桡动脉远端直径的性别差异。
Cardiol J. 2018;25(5):639-641. doi: 10.5603/CJ.2018.0128.