• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于基准剂量-反应模型的食品中胡薄荷酮的风险评估。

Risk Assessment of Pulegone in Foods Based on Benchmark Dose-Response Modeling.

作者信息

Voigt Verena, Franke Heike, Lachenmeier Dirk W

机构信息

Postgraduate Study of Toxicology and Environmental Protection, Rudolf-Boehm-Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Universität Leipzig, Härtelstrasse 16-18, 04107 Leipzig, Germany.

Chemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt (CVUA) Karlsruhe, Weissenburger Strasse 3, 76187 Karlsruhe, Germany.

出版信息

Foods. 2024 Sep 13;13(18):2906. doi: 10.3390/foods13182906.

DOI:10.3390/foods13182906
PMID:39335834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11430949/
Abstract

This study presents a new risk assessment of pulegone, a substance classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans (Group 2B) by the WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). The analysis used data from a two-year carcinogenicity studies in rats and mice conducted by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) in 2011. Because of the absence of a no-observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) in these studies, the benchmark dose (BMD) approach was employed as an alternative risk assessment method. The lowest BMD lower confidence level (BMDL) of 4.8 mg/kg b.w./day among the eight endpoints served as the point of departure for calculating an acceptable daily intake (ADI) of 48 μg/kg b.w./day. This new ADI is significantly lower than the previously established tolerable daily intake of 0.1 mg/kg b.w./day set in 1997. The analysis also considered various genotoxicity studies, which indicate that pulegone's effects follow a nongenotoxic, thresholded mechanism. The estimated intake levels of pulegone in the European Union and USA were below the newly calculated ADI, suggesting a low health risk based on current consumption patterns.

摘要

本研究对胡薄荷酮进行了新的风险评估。胡薄荷酮是世界卫生组织国际癌症研究机构(IARC)分类为对人类可能致癌(2B组)的一种物质。该分析使用了美国国家毒理学计划(NTP)2011年在大鼠和小鼠中进行的为期两年的致癌性研究数据。由于这些研究中没有未观察到不良作用水平(NOAEL),因此采用基准剂量(BMD)方法作为替代风险评估方法。八个终点中最低的BMD较低置信水平(BMDL)为4.8毫克/千克体重/天,作为计算每日可接受摄入量(ADI)48微克/千克体重/天的起始点。这个新的ADI显著低于1997年设定的先前确定的每日耐受摄入量0.1毫克/千克体重/天。该分析还考虑了各种遗传毒性研究,这些研究表明胡薄荷酮的作用遵循非遗传毒性、有阈值的机制。欧盟和美国胡薄荷酮的估计摄入量低于新计算的ADI,这表明基于当前消费模式,健康风险较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a46/11430949/43fc23a6cd56/foods-13-02906-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a46/11430949/6fb5601d029d/foods-13-02906-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a46/11430949/a5a30c0b35fc/foods-13-02906-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a46/11430949/aa1563fc41f1/foods-13-02906-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a46/11430949/311dbb2c80da/foods-13-02906-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a46/11430949/5acd5d129e2d/foods-13-02906-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a46/11430949/43fc23a6cd56/foods-13-02906-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a46/11430949/6fb5601d029d/foods-13-02906-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a46/11430949/a5a30c0b35fc/foods-13-02906-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a46/11430949/aa1563fc41f1/foods-13-02906-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a46/11430949/311dbb2c80da/foods-13-02906-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a46/11430949/5acd5d129e2d/foods-13-02906-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a46/11430949/43fc23a6cd56/foods-13-02906-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk Assessment of Pulegone in Foods Based on Benchmark Dose-Response Modeling.基于基准剂量-反应模型的食品中胡薄荷酮的风险评估。
Foods. 2024 Sep 13;13(18):2906. doi: 10.3390/foods13182906.
2
Risk Assessment of Isoeugenol in Food Based on Benchmark Dose-Response Modeling.基于基准剂量-反应模型的食品中异丁香酚风险评估
Toxics. 2023 Dec 5;11(12):991. doi: 10.3390/toxics11120991.
3
Determination of a site-specific reference dose for methylmercury for fish-eating populations.确定食鱼人群甲基汞的特定部位参考剂量。
Toxicol Ind Health. 2000 Nov;16(9-10):335-438. doi: 10.1177/074823370001600901.
4
Dietary glycation compounds - implications for human health.饮食糖化化合物 - 对人类健康的影响。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2024 Sep;54(8):485-617. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2024.2362985. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
5
Does EU legislation allow the use of the Benchmark Dose (BMD) approach for risk assessment?欧盟法规是否允许使用基准剂量(BMD)方法进行风险评估?
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2013 Nov;67(2):182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
6
A weight of evidence evaluation of the mode of action of isoeugenol.姜酚作用机制的证据评估
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2024 Jun;150:105642. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2024.105642. Epub 2024 May 11.
7
Evaluation of the benchmark dose for point of departure determination for a variety of chemical classes in applied regulatory settings.应用监管环境中各种化学类别用于确定起始点的基准剂量评估。
Risk Anal. 2012 May;32(5):830-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01732.x. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
8
Risk assessment of thujone in foods and medicines containing sage and wormwood--evidence for a need of regulatory changes?含 sage 和 wormwood 的食品和药品中thagone 的风险评估--监管变化的必要性证据?
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Dec;58(3):437-43. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.08.012. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
9
Background to the ADI/TDI/PTWI.每日允许摄入量/暂定每日允许摄入量/每日耐受摄入量的背景知识。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1999 Oct;30(2 Pt 2):S109-13. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1999.1335.
10
An evaluation of benchmark dose methodology for non-cancer continuous-data health effects in animals due to exposures to dioxin (TCDD).对动物因接触二噁英(TCDD)而产生的非癌症连续性数据健康影响的基准剂量方法学评估。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2004 Aug;40(1):9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.04.002.

引用本文的文献

1
Anticandidal activity of essential oil.精油的抗念珠菌活性。
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Jul 10;16:1634250. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1634250. eCollection 2025.
2
Supplementation Promotes Growth, Immunity, and Disease Resistance in Nile tilapia Against .补充剂可促进尼罗罗非鱼的生长、免疫力及抗病能力。
Pathogens. 2025 Apr 12;14(4):378. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14040378.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidance on the use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment.风险评估中基准剂量法的使用指南。
EFSA J. 2022 Oct 25;20(10):e07584. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7584. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, pulegone, CAS Registry Number 89-82-7.香料成分互认组织(RIFM)香料成分安全性评估,胡薄荷酮,化学物质登记号89 - 82 - 7。
Food Chem Toxicol. 2021 Mar;149 Suppl 1:112092. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112092. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
3
Some Drugs and Herbal Products.一些药物和草药产品。
IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2016;108:7-419.
4
Threshold and non-threshold chemical carcinogens: A survey of the present regulatory landscape.阈限性与非阈限性化学致癌物:当前监管格局综述
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017 Aug;88:291-302. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.01.003. Epub 2017 Jan 21.
5
Safety assessment of essential oil from Minthostachys verticillata (Griseb.) Epling (peperina): 90-days oral subchronic toxicity study in rats.轮叶薄荷(Minthostachys verticillata (Griseb.) Epling)(佩佩里纳)精油的安全性评估:大鼠90天口服亚慢性毒性研究。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Feb;71(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
6
Mode of action of pulegone on the urinary bladder of F344 rats.对 F344 大鼠膀胱的侧柏酮作用方式。
Toxicol Sci. 2012 Jul;128(1):1-8. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfs135. Epub 2012 Apr 12.
7
Toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of pulegone (CAS No. 89-82-7) in F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice (gavage studies).胡薄荷酮(CAS编号:89 - 82 - 7)在F344/N大鼠和B6C3F1小鼠中的毒理学和致癌性研究(灌胃研究)
Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 2011 Aug(563):1-201.
8
Genotoxic thresholds, DNA repair, and susceptibility in human populations.人群中的遗传毒性阈值、DNA 修复和易感性。
Toxicology. 2010 Dec 30;278(3):305-10. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.11.016. Epub 2009 Nov 22.
9
Mechanisms of non-genotoxic carcinogens and importance of a weight of evidence approach.非遗传毒性致癌物的作用机制及证据权重方法的重要性。
Mutat Res. 2009 Sep-Dec;682(2-3):94-109. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2009.07.002. Epub 2009 Jul 22.
10
The refinement of uncertainty/safety factors in risk assessment by the incorporation of data on toxicokinetic variability in humans.通过纳入人类毒代动力学变异性数据来完善风险评估中的不确定性/安全系数。
Toxicol Sci. 2005 Jul;86(1):20-6. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfi160. Epub 2005 Mar 30.