Nolen W A, van de Putte J J, Dijken W A, Kamp J S
Br J Psychiatry. 1985 Jul;147:16-22. doi: 10.1192/bjp.147.1.16.
L-5HTP and tranylcypromine were compared in an open, but controlled and cross-over study, in patients suffering from major depression; all were non-responders to several reuptake inhibitors, including oxaprotiline and fluvoxamine. After four unsuccessful sleep-deprivations, L-5HTP or tranylcypromine were given during four weeks in a crossover design. Of 17 patients given L-5HTP during both treatment periods, none responded, whereas of 26 patients treated with tranylcypromine, 15 responded. Thus, L-5HTP is not a therapeutically effective alternative in depressed patients who have not responded to reuptake inhibitors.
在一项针对重度抑郁症患者的开放性但有对照且交叉的研究中,对L-5羟色氨酸(L-5HTP)和反苯环丙胺进行了比较;所有患者对包括奥沙普明和氟伏沙明在内的几种再摄取抑制剂均无反应。在四次睡眠剥夺治疗失败后,采用交叉设计,在四周内给予L-5HTP或反苯环丙胺。在两个治疗期均给予L-5HTP的17例患者中,无一人有反应,而在接受反苯环丙胺治疗的26例患者中,有15人有反应。因此,对于对再摄取抑制剂无反应的抑郁症患者,L-5HTP不是一种有效的治疗选择。