Suppr超能文献

单腿深蹲和腘绳肌柔韧性识别非特异性慢性下腰痛的问题侧。

Identifying the Problem Side with Single-Leg Squat and Hamstrings Flexibility for Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain.

机构信息

Health and Social Sciences (Physiotherapy), Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore 138683, Singapore.

Physical Education and Sports Science Department, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637616, Singapore.

出版信息

Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Sep 1;60(9):1428. doi: 10.3390/medicina60091428.

Abstract

: In patients with non-specific chronic low back pain (LBP), their pain and problem sides can differ. Clinical Pilates assessment provides an approach to identify the problem side, but this approach requires experience and can be subjective. This study aimed to investigate if objective measures of single-leg squat postural control and hamstrings flexibility could identify the problem side in adults with non-specific chronic LBP. : Forty adults with non-specific chronic LBP were tested on single-leg squat postural control and hamstrings flexibility. The problem side of participants was assessed with the Clinical Pilates method. Paired -tests were used to compare the postural sway parameters of the single-leg squat and hamstrings flexibility between the problem and non-problem sides. Cohen's kappa was then used to assess the agreement of postural sway and flexibility measures with the Clinical Pilates method. : The problem side showed smaller vertical force variance, larger sway path distances, lower peak vertical force, smaller terminal knee flexion angle, longer time to complete the five single-leg squats, and tighter hamstrings as compared to the non-problem side. However, only the overall and anteroposterior sway path distances, terminal knee flexion angle, total squat duration, and hamstrings flexibility yielded moderate to strong agreement with the Clinical Pilates method. : Single-leg squat postural sway parameters and hamstrings flexibility can objectively identify the problem side in adults with non-specific chronic LBP.

摘要

在非特异性慢性下背痛(LBP)患者中,他们的疼痛和问题侧可能不同。临床普拉提评估提供了一种识别问题侧的方法,但这种方法需要经验并且可能具有主观性。本研究旨在探讨单腿深蹲姿势控制和腘绳肌柔韧性的客观测量是否可以识别非特异性慢性 LBP 成人的问题侧。

40 名非特异性慢性 LBP 成人接受了单腿深蹲姿势控制和腘绳肌柔韧性测试。使用临床普拉提方法评估参与者的问题侧。配对检验用于比较单腿深蹲和腘绳肌柔韧性的姿势摆动参数在问题侧和非问题侧之间的差异。然后使用 Cohen's kappa 评估姿势摆动和柔韧性测量与临床普拉提方法的一致性。

与非问题侧相比,问题侧的垂直力方差较小,摆动路径距离较大,峰值垂直力较低,终末膝关节屈曲角度较小,完成五次单腿深蹲的时间较长,腘绳肌较紧。然而,只有总摆动路径距离和前后摆动路径距离、终末膝关节屈曲角度、总深蹲持续时间和腘绳肌柔韧性与临床普拉提方法具有中度至高度一致性。

单腿深蹲姿势摆动参数和腘绳肌柔韧性可以客观地识别非特异性慢性 LBP 成人的问题侧。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67b4/11434532/50ec9c1cb35a/medicina-60-01428-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验