Cooper R F
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985 Nov 16;291(6506):1391-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.291.6506.1391.
A cross sectional study based on all (1260) general practices in the West Midlands was conducted in late 1984 and early 1985. Responses to a postal questionnaire were received from 762 (60.5%) practices, and of these, 387 (50.8%) stated that they had an age-sex register; 104 (13.6%) practices replied that they had definite plans to establish an age-sex register within six months, and a random sample of these was later telephoned to see if the plans had come to fruition. A random telephone sample was also made from the 498 (39.5%) non-responders. It was concluded that the current prevalence of age-sex registers in the West Midlands is 52% (+/- 5% for 95% confidence) of all practices. A register has now been established of 422 practices (35.5% of the total number in the West Midlands) that have an age-sex register. This is being used as a database for other research. The most common reason stated for not having an age-sex register was that it would be too time consuming. Most of the practices that had one stated that it was used for research, disease recording, screening, surveillance, or health education, which implies that the registers are being used.
1984年末和1985年初,在西米德兰兹郡的所有1260家普通诊所开展了一项横断面研究。762家(60.5%)诊所回复了邮寄问卷调查,其中387家(50.8%)表示拥有年龄-性别登记册;104家(13.6%)诊所回复称有在六个月内建立年龄-性别登记册的明确计划,之后对这些诊所中的一个随机样本进行了电话随访,以了解计划是否已实现。还从498家(39.5%)未回复的诊所中抽取了一个随机电话样本。得出的结论是,西米德兰兹郡目前年龄-性别登记册的普及率为所有诊所的52%(95%置信区间为±5%)。现已建立了一个包含422家拥有年龄-性别登记册诊所的登记册(占西米德兰兹郡总数的35.5%)。这正被用作其他研究的数据库。未拥有年龄-性别登记册最常见的原因是耗时过长。大多数拥有登记册的诊所表示,其用于研究、疾病记录、筛查、监测或健康教育,这意味着登记册正在被使用。