Suppr超能文献

年龄-性别登记作为全科医疗的筛查工具:错误地址问题的规模

Age-sex registers as a screening tool for general practice: size of the wrong address problem.

作者信息

Silman A J

出版信息

Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Aug 18;289(6442):415-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.289.6442.415.

Abstract

Age-sex registers were compiled and updated for the east London general practices participating in a screening study for hypertension. Of 1435 addresses in the registers of two practices that were checked, 228 (16%) were incorrect, according to the return by the post office of the screening invitations and checking the addresses of the non-responders using telephone directories and the medical records. The non-responders to the screening invitation for whom a new address was not found, were visited at the address as recorded on the age-sex register. This showed that the true address error rate from the original age-sex registers was 26% and thus substantially greater than that calculated from returned letters. It is concluded that the non-acceptance rate of screening in general practice might be exaggerated as a result of the lack of a correct address for a substantial proportion of the patients on a general practice list.

摘要

为参与高血压筛查研究的东伦敦全科诊所编制并更新了年龄-性别登记册。根据筛查邀请的邮局回执以及使用电话簿和病历核对未回复者的地址,在对两个诊所登记册中的1435个地址进行核对后,发现有228个(16%)地址有误。对于未找到新地址的筛查邀请未回复者,按照年龄-性别登记册上记录的地址进行了家访。结果显示,原始年龄-性别登记册的真实地址错误率为26%,因此大大高于根据回信计算出的错误率。得出的结论是,由于全科诊所名单上相当一部分患者没有正确地址,全科诊所筛查的未接受率可能被夸大了。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验