Mojaddedi Sanaullah, Jamil Javairia, Bishev Daniel, Essilfie-Quaye Kobina, Elgendy Islam Y
College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Graduate Medical Education, Orlando, FL 32827, USA.
Internal Medicine Residency Program, HCA Florida North Florida Hospital, Gainesville, FL 32605, USA.
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 20;13(18):5583. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185583.
Acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a leading cause of mortality. Not only is PE associated with short-term mortality, but up to ~20% of patients might suffer from long-term consequences such as post-PE syndrome and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Current risk stratification tools poorly predict those who are at risk for short-term deterioration and those who develop long-term consequences. Traditionally, systemic thrombolysis has been considered the first-line therapy for patients with high-risk PE without contraindications; however, it comes with the risk of major bleeding (notably intracranial hemorrhage). The use of catheter-directed interventions (embolectomy or thrombolysis) has been increasing owing to their low bleeding risk; however, randomized trial data supporting their efficacy in improving clinical outcomes are limited. In this review, we highlight the evidence supporting the available advanced therapies for high- and intermediate-risk PE and summarize the ongoing trials which are evaluating these therapies.
急性肺栓塞(PE)是导致死亡的主要原因。PE不仅与短期死亡率相关,而且高达约20%的患者可能会遭受长期后果,如肺栓塞后综合征和慢性血栓栓塞性肺动脉高压。目前的风险分层工具很难预测哪些患者有短期病情恶化的风险,以及哪些患者会出现长期后果。传统上,全身溶栓一直被认为是无禁忌证的高危PE患者的一线治疗方法;然而,它存在大出血(尤其是颅内出血)的风险。由于导管定向干预(栓子切除术或溶栓)出血风险低,其使用一直在增加;然而,支持其改善临床结局疗效的随机试验数据有限。在本综述中,我们强调了支持现有高危和中危PE高级治疗方法的证据,并总结了正在评估这些治疗方法的正在进行的试验。