Galas Agata, Krzesiński Paweł, Banak Małgorzata, Gielerak Grzegorz
Department of Cardiology and Internal Diseases, Military Institute of Medicine, National Research Institute, 04-141 Warsaw, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 22;13(18):5625. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185625.
The main cause of hospitalization in patients with heart failure is hypervolemia. Therefore, the primary treatment strategy involves diuretic therapy using intravenous loop diuretics to achieve decongestion and euvolemia. Some patients with acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF) do not respond well to diuretic treatment, which may be due to diuretic resistance (DR). Such cases require high doses of diuretic medications and combination therapy with diuretics of different mechanisms of action. Although certain predisposing factors for diuretic resistance have been identified (such as hypotension, type 2 diabetes, impaired renal function, and hyponatremia), further research is needed to identify other pathophysiological markers of DR. This study aims to identify admission markers that can predict a high requirement for intravenous diuretics in hospitalized patients with decompensated heart failure. This study included 102 adult patients hospitalized for ADHF. At admission, patients underwent clinical assessment, laboratory parameter evaluation (including the N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP] levels), and hemodynamic assessment using impedance cardiography (ICG). Hemodynamic profiles were based on the use of parameters such as heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and thoracic fluid content (TFC) as markers of volume status. The analysis included 97 patients with documented doses of intravenous diuretic use. Patients were stratified into two groups based on median diuretic consumption (equivalent to 540 mg of intravenous furosemide): the high-loop diuretic utilization (LDU) group ( = 49) and the low-LDU group ( = 48). Compared to low-LDU patients, high-LDU patients had greater thoracic fluid content at admission, both quantitatively (37.4 ± 8.1 vs. 34.1 ± 6.9 kOhm-1; = 0.024) and qualitatively (TFC ≥ 35 kOhm-1: 59.2% vs. 33.3%; = 0.011). Anemia was more common in the high-LDU group (67.4% vs. 43.8%; = 0.019), as was elevated NT-proBNP (≥median of 3952 pg/mL: 60.4% vs. 37.5%; = 0.024). High LDU was associated with a significantly longer hospitalization duration (12.9 ± 6.4 vs. 7.0 ± 2.6 days; < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis identified anemia, elevated NT-proBNP, and high TFC as predictors of high LDU (HR: 2.65, 2.54, and 2.90, respectively). In a multifactorial model, only high TFC remained an independent predictor (HR: 2.60, 95% CI 1.04-6.49; = 0.038). TFC was the sole independent admission marker of a high requirement for intravenous diuretics in patients hospitalized for decompensated heart failure. An objective assessment of volume status by impedance cardiography may support intensive personalized decongestion therapy.
心力衰竭患者住院的主要原因是血容量过多。因此,主要治疗策略包括使用静脉袢利尿剂进行利尿治疗,以实现消肿和血容量正常。一些急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)患者对利尿治疗反应不佳,这可能是由于利尿剂抵抗(DR)。此类病例需要高剂量的利尿药物以及不同作用机制利尿剂的联合治疗。尽管已确定了某些导致利尿剂抵抗的易感因素(如低血压、2型糖尿病、肾功能受损和低钠血症),但仍需要进一步研究以确定DR的其他病理生理标志物。本研究旨在确定可预测失代偿性心力衰竭住院患者对静脉利尿剂高需求的入院标志物。本研究纳入了102例因ADHF住院的成年患者。入院时,患者接受了临床评估、实验室参数评估(包括脑钠肽前体N末端[NT-proBNP]水平)以及使用阻抗心动图(ICG)进行的血流动力学评估。血流动力学概况基于使用心率(HR)、血压(BP)和胸液含量(TFC)等参数作为容量状态的标志物。分析纳入了97例有记录的静脉利尿剂使用剂量的患者。根据利尿剂消耗量中位数(相当于540mg静脉注射呋塞米)将患者分为两组:高袢利尿剂利用率(LDU)组(n = 49)和低LDU组(n = 48)。与低LDU患者相比,高LDU患者入院时胸液含量在定量方面(37.4±8.1 vs. 34.1±6.9 kOhm-1;P = 0.024)和定性方面(TFC≥35 kOhm-1:59.2% vs. 33.3%;P = 0.011)都更高。高LDU组贫血更为常见(67.4% vs. 43.8%;P = 0.019),NT-proBNP升高(≥中位数3952 pg/mL:60.4% vs. 37.5%;P = 0.024)也更常见。高LDU与显著更长的住院时间相关(12.9±6.4 vs. 7.0±2.6天;P < 0.001)。逻辑回归分析确定贫血、NT-proBNP升高和高TFC是高LDU的预测因素(HR分别为2.65、2.54和2.90)。在多因素模型中,只有高TFC仍然是独立预测因素(HR:2.60,95% CI 1.04 - 6.49;P = 0.038)。TFC是失代偿性心力衰竭住院患者对静脉利尿剂高需求的唯一独立入院标志物。通过阻抗心动图对容量状态进行客观评估可能有助于强化个性化消肿治疗。