Southcentral Foundation, Anchorage, AK 99508, USA.
Chickasaw Nation, Ada, OK 74820, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Aug 29;21(9):1144. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21091144.
The cognitive interview process is a method to validate a survey instrument's face validity and enhance confidence in item interpretation, as well as a method to engage communities in the research process. Trained American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) interviewers conducted retrospective cognitive interviews at three AIAN communities to assess the item quality of a 131-item survey item that measures AIAN knowledge and attitudes on genetics and biological specimens. A cognitive interview process was used to assess cultural consonance, thought processes used when considering survey instructions, items and responses, and language preference of survey items in the development of a survey to assess public knowledge and attitudes on genetics. Content analysis was used to analyze interview data. Survey instructions, items and scales generated no cognitive difficulties. The participants noted being unfamiliar with terminology used to describe genetic and biological specimens. In several cases, the participants' written response in the survey and verbal response in the interview did not align. A resultant 52-item survey for use in AIAN communities was finalized. Cognitive interviewing is resource-intensive; however, ignoring community engagement during survey development results in inappropriate interpretations about culturally diverse populations such as AIAN peoples.
认知访谈过程是一种验证调查工具表面有效性并增强对项目解释的信心的方法,也是一种让社区参与研究过程的方法。经过培训的美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AIAN)访谈者在三个 AIAN 社区进行了回溯性认知访谈,以评估一项衡量 AIAN 对遗传学和生物样本的知识和态度的 131 项调查项目的项目质量。认知访谈过程用于评估文化协调性、考虑调查说明、项目和回答时使用的思维过程,以及在开发调查以评估公众对遗传学的知识和态度时对调查项目的语言偏好。内容分析用于分析访谈数据。调查说明、项目和量表没有产生认知困难。参与者表示不熟悉用于描述遗传和生物样本的术语。在几种情况下,参与者在调查中的书面回答和访谈中的口头回答不一致。最终确定了一份用于 AIAN 社区的 52 项调查。认知访谈是资源密集型的;但是,在调查开发过程中忽略社区参与会导致对像 AIAN 这样的文化多元化人群的不适当解释。