Being in Good Community: Engagement in Support of Indigenous Sovereignty.
作者信息
Blanchard Jessica, Hiratsuka Vanessa
机构信息
University of Oklahoma.
University of Alaska Anchorage.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2021 Oct;21(10):54-56. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1965243.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Being in Good Community: Engagement in Support of Indigenous Sovereignty.融入良好社区：参与支持原住民主权
Am J Bioeth. 2021 Oct;21(10):54-56. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1965243.
2
Trust in Scholarly Communications and Infrastructure: Indigenous Data Sovereignty.对学术交流与基础设施的信任：本土数据主权
Front Res Metr Anal. 2022 Jan 12;6:752336. doi: 10.3389/frma.2021.752336. eCollection 2021.
3
Indigenous Data Governance: Strategies from United States Native Nations.本土数据治理：来自美国原住民部落的策略
Data Sci J. 2019;18. doi: 10.5334/dsj-2019-031.
4
The Food Equity and Environmental Data Sovereignty (FEEDS) Project: Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Study Evaluating a Digital Platform for Climate Change Preparedness.食品公平与环境数据主权（FEEDS）项目：一项评估气候变化应对数字平台的准实验研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Sep 15;10(9):e31389. doi: 10.2196/31389.
5
Relationality, Responsibility and Reciprocity: Cultivating Indigenous Food Sovereignty within Urban Environments.关系性、责任与互惠：在城市环境中培养本土食物主权。
Nutrients. 2022 Apr 22;14(9):1737. doi: 10.3390/nu14091737.
6
Examining Indigenous food sovereignty as a conceptual framework for health in two urban communities in Northern Ontario, Canada.审视加拿大安大略省北部两个城市社区的原住民食物主权，作为健康的概念框架。
Glob Health Promot. 2019 Apr;26(3_suppl):54-63. doi: 10.1177/1757975919831639.
7
Restorying Northern Arapaho food sovereignty.重塑北阿拉帕霍人的食物主权。
J Agric Food Syst Community Dev. 2019 Dec 21;9(B Suppl 2):69-84. doi: 10.5304/jafscd.2019.09b.012. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
8
Characterization of indigenous community engagement in arthritis studies conducted in Canada, United States of America, Australia and New Zealand.加拿大、美国、澳大利亚和新西兰开展的关节炎研究中本土社区参与情况的描述。
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2019 Aug;49(1):145-155. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
9
What do you mean by engagement? - evaluating the use of community engagement in the design and implementation of chronic disease-based interventions for Indigenous populations - scoping review.“参与”是什么意思？——评估社区参与在为原住民设计和实施基于慢性病的干预措施中的应用——范围综述
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 6;20(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01346-6.
10
Genomic Research Through an Indigenous Lens: Understanding the Expectations.从原住民视角进行基因组研究：理解其期望。
Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2019 Aug 31;20:495-517. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-083118-015434. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
引用本文的文献
1
Use of Cognitive Interviews in the Development of a Survey Assessing American Indian and Alaska Native Adult Perspectives on Genetics and Biological Specimens.运用认知访谈法开发评估美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民成年人对遗传学和生物样本观点的调查。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Aug 29;21(9):1144. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21091144.
2
Interrogating the Value of Return of Results for Diverse Populations: Perspectives from Precision Medicine Researchers.探究不同人群结果回报的价值：精准医学研究人员的观点。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2024 Apr-Jun;15(2):108-119. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2023.2279965. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
本文引用的文献
1
Indigenous Data Governance: Strategies from United States Native Nations.本土数据治理：来自美国原住民部落的策略
Data Sci J. 2019;18. doi: 10.5334/dsj-2019-031.
2
Power Sharing, Capacity Building, and Evolving Roles in ELSI: The Center for the Ethics of Indigenous Genomic Research.权力共享、能力建设与ELSI中不断演变的角色：本土基因组研究伦理中心
Collaborations (Coral Gables). 2020;3(1). doi: 10.33596/coll.71. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
3
Deliberations with American Indian and Alaska Native People about the Ethics of Genomics: An Adapted Model of Deliberation Used with Three Tribal Communities in the United States.与美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民就基因组学伦理进行的审议：在美国三个部落社区使用的审议模型的改编版。
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2021 Jul-Sep;12(3):164-178. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2021.1925775. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
4
Generations of genomes: advances in paleogenomics technology and engagement for Indigenous people of the Americas.历代基因组：古基因组学技术的进展以及美洲原住民的参与情况
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2020 Jun;62:91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
5
Deliberations About Genomic Research and Biobanks With Citizens of the Chickasaw Nation.与奇克索族公民就基因组研究和生物样本库进行的商讨。
Front Genet. 2020 May 14;11:466. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00466. eCollection 2020.
6
An Alaska Native community's views on genetic research, testing, and return of results: Results from a public deliberation.阿拉斯加原住民社区对基因研究、检测和结果回报的看法：公众审议的结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 16;15(3):e0229540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229540. eCollection 2020.
7
Fostering Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications Research in Tribal Communities: The Center for the Ethics of Indigenous Genomic Research.促进部落社区的伦理、法律和社会影响研究：本土基因组研究伦理中心
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2020 Oct;15(4):271-278. doi: 10.1177/1556264619872640. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
8
Defining and Achieving Health Equity in Genomic Medicine.定义和实现基因组医学中的健康公平性。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Feb 21;29(Suppl 1):173-178. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.S1.173. eCollection 2019.
9
A framework for enhancing ethical genomic research with Indigenous communities.促进与原住民社区合作的基因组学研究的伦理框架。
Nat Commun. 2018 Jul 27;9(1):2957. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05188-3.
10
Genomics, Health Disparities, and Missed Opportunities for the Nation's Research Agenda.基因组学、健康差异与国家研究议程中错失的机遇。
JAMA. 2017 May 9;317(18):1831-1832. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.3096.
Zotero 插件