Suppr超能文献

通过“首选药物”目标控制处方——巴伐利亚的经验。

Controlling Prescribing through "Preferred Drug" Targets-The Bavarian Experience.

机构信息

Institute of General Practice/Family Medicine, Philipps University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Straße 4, 35043 Marburg, Germany.

Institute of General Practice, Friedrich-Alexander-University of Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Universitätsstr. 29, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 3;21(9):1174. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21091174.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The rising costs of drugs are putting health care systems under pressure. We report on the Bavarian Drug Agreement, which employs prescribing targets for preferred and generic drugs in ambulatory care. Under this agreement, providers are regularly profiled with individual feedback but also possible sanctions. We investigated the degree to which targets were being met (or not) and why failure occurred.

METHODS

We analysed prescribing data aggregated by practice for the quarter 1/2018. We chose eight specialisation groups and analysed their drug targets with a high prescribing volume, widely missed drug targets (<90%), and drugs preventing drug target achievement. Characterisation of drug targets and preventing drugs was undertaken.

RESULTS

Drug targets with a high prescribing volume are mostly achieved, while highly missed drug targets mostly do not affect the main indication area of the specialisation groups considered. Generic drug targets seem to be more easily achieved than recommended drug targets. Paediatrics accounts for the largest number of missed drug targets.

CONCLUSIONS

The Bavarian tool implemented uses the prescribing volume (DDD) and price components to evaluate the prescription behaviour of physicians. Well-established drugs with demonstrated effectiveness, safety, and lower costs are preferred. Nevertheless, me-too drugs, combination drugs, costly innovations with unclear value, and drugs with application methods of variable convenience challenge the drug prescribers and are reasons for missed drug targets.

摘要

背景

药品成本的不断上升给医疗保健系统带来了压力。我们报告了巴伐利亚药品协议,该协议在门诊护理中使用首选药物和仿制药的处方目标。根据该协议,提供者会定期根据个人反馈进行分析,但也可能会受到制裁。我们调查了目标的实现程度(或未实现程度)以及失败的原因。

方法

我们分析了 2018 年第 1/2 季度按实践汇总的处方数据。我们选择了八个专业组,并分析了他们的高处方量药物目标、广泛错过的药物目标(<90%)和预防药物目标实现的药物。对药物目标和预防药物进行了特征描述。

结果

高处方量的药物目标大多得到实现,而高度错过的药物目标大多不会影响所考虑的专业组的主要适应症领域。仿制药目标似乎比推荐药物目标更容易实现。儿科占错过药物目标最多的比例。

结论

巴伐利亚实施的工具使用处方量(DDD)和价格因素来评估医生的处方行为。具有已证实的有效性、安全性和较低成本的成熟药物是首选。然而,类药药物、组合药物、具有不确定价值的昂贵创新药物和应用方法方便性不同的药物都给药物开处方者带来了挑战,也是错过药物目标的原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56da/11431696/c0dc905ed9de/ijerph-21-01174-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验