College of Dental Medicine, Roseman University of Health Sciences, South Jordan, UT 84095, USA.
Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 5;21(9):1183. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21091183.
This study explored whether opinions about the government's role in addressing the COVID-19 pandemic vary based on demographic characteristics and racial beliefs. We hypothesized that opinions about the United States (U.S.) government's response to COVID-19 would differ based on an individual's characteristics such as age, race, and racial beliefs.
We utilized an Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research dataset to examine differences in opinion regarding the government's pandemic response, considering personal characteristics and racial beliefs. Descriptive statistics depicted respondents' characteristics, and a Chi-square test for independence assessed whether differences emerged based on racial attitude, self-reported racial identity, sex, income, education, and age. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to independently determine which characteristics were associated with differences in evaluating the government's pandemic response.
The sample consisted of 1028 respondents: 47.5% male and 52.5% female. Overall, the group viewed the government unfavorably, with only 40% reporting that the government responded correctly and 54% believing the government is almost always wasteful and inefficient. Hispanics or Latinos were more likely to view the government as wasteful or inefficient, while more Whites rated the government's pandemic response as appropriate. Individuals who believed that racial discrimination is the main reason why many Black people cannot get ahead generally regarded the government's pandemic response more favorably. Only 5% deemed the government's response excessive. Being Black, younger, and female was associated with the view that racial discrimination is the main reason why many Black people cannot get ahead. Individuals who felt this way viewed the government unfavorably by almost a 2:1 ratio.
A majority of U.S. residents do not believe the government responded correctly to the pandemic and more than half viewed the government as wasteful and inefficient. Differences emerged by ethnicity and racial attitudes, with individuals of color holding more negative views of the government's response. Understanding this perspective can help develop messaging and strategies that resonate with communities where racial and minority groups live.
本研究探讨了人们对政府在应对 COVID-19 大流行方面的角色的看法是否因人口统计学特征和种族信仰而有所不同。我们假设,个人对美国政府应对 COVID-19 的看法会因年龄、种族和种族信仰等特征而有所不同。
我们利用大学间政治和社会研究联合会的数据集,研究了个人特征和种族信仰对政府大流行应对措施看法的差异。描述性统计数据描绘了受访者的特征,卡方独立性检验评估了种族态度、自我报告的种族身份、性别、收入、教育程度和年龄等因素是否存在差异。逻辑回归分析用于独立确定哪些特征与评估政府大流行应对措施的差异相关。
样本由 1028 名受访者组成:47.5%为男性,52.5%为女性。总体而言,该群体对政府的评价不佳,只有 40%的人认为政府的反应正确,54%的人认为政府几乎总是浪费和低效。西班牙裔或拉丁裔更有可能认为政府浪费或低效,而更多的白人则认为政府的大流行应对措施恰当。认为种族歧视是许多黑人无法出头的主要原因的人普遍对政府的大流行应对措施评价更为积极。只有 5%的人认为政府的反应过度。黑人、年轻和女性与认为种族歧视是许多黑人无法出头的主要原因有关。持这种观点的人几乎以 2:1 的比例对政府持负面看法。
大多数美国居民认为政府没有正确应对疫情,超过一半的人认为政府浪费且效率低下。种族和种族态度的差异导致了不同的看法,有色人种对政府应对措施的负面看法更为强烈。了解这一观点有助于制定与种族和少数民族群体居住的社区产生共鸣的信息和策略。