• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情流行病学中的行为经济学:理论与模拟。

Behavioral Economics in the Epidemiology of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Theory and Simulations.

机构信息

Fundamentos del Análisis Económico (FAE), University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain.

Applied Economics Department, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 3;19(15):9557. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159557.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph19159557
PMID:35954908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9368471/
Abstract

We provide a game-theoretical epidemiological model for the COVID-19 pandemic that takes into account that: (1) asymptomatic individuals can be contagious, (2) contagion is behavior-dependent, (3) behavior is determined by a game that depends on beliefs and social interactions, (4) there can be systematic biases in the perceptions and beliefs about the pandemic. We incorporate lockdown decisions by the government into the model. The citizens' and government's beliefs can exhibit several biases that we discuss from the point of view of behavioral economics. We provide simulations to understand the effect of lockdown decisions and the possibility of "nudging" citizens in the right direction by improving the accuracy of their beliefs.

摘要

我们提供了一个考虑到以下因素的 COVID-19 大流行的博弈论流行病学模型:(1) 无症状个体可能具有传染性;(2) 传染与行为有关;(3) 行为由取决于信念和社会互动的博弈决定;(4) 对大流行的看法和信念可能存在系统偏差。我们将政府的封锁决策纳入模型中。公民和政府的信念可能表现出我们从行为经济学角度讨论的几种偏差。我们提供模拟结果,以了解封锁决策的效果,以及通过提高公民信念的准确性来“推动”他们走向正确方向的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/d2a3d3d5e8c5/ijerph-19-09557-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/16ebe59a03dc/ijerph-19-09557-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/1034db6deacf/ijerph-19-09557-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/3ca471dcdea8/ijerph-19-09557-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/cab54939296b/ijerph-19-09557-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/1f5067e51cbc/ijerph-19-09557-g0A5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/35f7a5090c26/ijerph-19-09557-g0A6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/0992bd6dec4a/ijerph-19-09557-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/00590cd04f66/ijerph-19-09557-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/1ff69fa6c432/ijerph-19-09557-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/d2a3d3d5e8c5/ijerph-19-09557-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/16ebe59a03dc/ijerph-19-09557-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/1034db6deacf/ijerph-19-09557-g0A2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/3ca471dcdea8/ijerph-19-09557-g0A3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/cab54939296b/ijerph-19-09557-g0A4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/1f5067e51cbc/ijerph-19-09557-g0A5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/35f7a5090c26/ijerph-19-09557-g0A6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/0992bd6dec4a/ijerph-19-09557-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/00590cd04f66/ijerph-19-09557-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/1ff69fa6c432/ijerph-19-09557-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/659f/9368471/d2a3d3d5e8c5/ijerph-19-09557-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Behavioral Economics in the Epidemiology of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Theory and Simulations.新冠疫情流行病学中的行为经济学:理论与模拟。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 3;19(15):9557. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159557.
2
Citizens' Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Recommendations by the Government: A 3-Country Comparative Evaluation Using Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey Data.公民对政府新冠疫情缓解建议的遵守情况:基于网络横断面调查数据的三国比较评估
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e20634. doi: 10.2196/20634.
3
Racial Attitudes and Perceptions of Government Response during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications for Public Health Strategies.种族态度和对 COVID-19 大流行期间政府应对措施的看法:对公共卫生策略的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 5;21(9):1183. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21091183.
4
Government's policy, citizens' behavior, and COVID-19 pandemic.政府政策、公民行为与新冠疫情
J Med Virol. 2021 Mar;93(3):1214-1216. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26559. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
5
Older adults' perceptions of government handling of COVID-19: Predictors of protective behaviors from lockdown to post-lockdown.老年人对政府处理 COVID-19 的看法:从封锁到封锁后,预测保护行为的因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 2;17(2):e0263039. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263039. eCollection 2022.
6
Reasons behind declining of cases during the COVID-19 wavelets in Pakistan: public healthcare system or government smart lockdown policy?巴基斯坦新冠疫情小波期间病例下降的原因:公共医疗体系还是政府明智的封锁政策?
Cien Saude Colet. 2022 Aug;27(8):2973-2984. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232022278.06012022. Epub 2022 May 14.
7
Effects of the COVID-19 Emergency and National Lockdown on Italian Citizens' Economic Concerns, Government Trust, and Health Engagement: Evidence From a Two-Wave Panel Study.COVID-19 紧急状态和全国封锁对意大利公民经济担忧、政府信任和健康参与的影响:来自两轮面板研究的证据。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):369-392. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12506. Epub 2021 Apr 6.
8
Requestioning the Indonesia Government's Public Policy Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Black Box Analysis for the Period of January-July 2020.质疑印尼政府对 COVID-19 大流行的公共政策反应:2020 年 1 月至 7 月期间的黑箱分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 May 10;9:612994. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.612994. eCollection 2021.
9
Perceptions of the COVID-19 pandemic and government response among Turkish-speaking immigrants in Germany during the initial lockdown period.德国讲土耳其语移民在首次封锁期间对新冠疫情及政府应对措施的看法。
J Public Health Policy. 2023 Dec;44(4):602-615. doi: 10.1057/s41271-023-00449-y. Epub 2023 Nov 18.
10
[Nudges and the pandemic: An analysis from economics and behavioural law. SESPAS Report 2022].[助推与疫情:经济学和行为法学分析。西班牙公共卫生与健康研究所2022年报告]
Gac Sanit. 2022;36 Suppl 1:S93-S96. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2022.03.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial Attitudes and Perceptions of Government Response during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Implications for Public Health Strategies.种族态度和对 COVID-19 大流行期间政府应对措施的看法:对公共卫生策略的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Sep 5;21(9):1183. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21091183.
2
Assessing the relationship between delay discounting and decisions to engage in various protective behaviors during COVID-19.评估在 COVID-19 期间,延迟折扣与参与各种保护行为决策之间的关系。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Jun 18;9(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00566-6.

本文引用的文献

1
[Nudges and the pandemic: An analysis from economics and behavioural law. SESPAS Report 2022].[助推与疫情:经济学和行为法学分析。西班牙公共卫生与健康研究所2022年报告]
Gac Sanit. 2022;36 Suppl 1:S93-S96. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2022.03.004.
2
Experimental evidence that changing beliefs about mask efficacy and social norms increase mask wearing for COVID-19 risk reduction: Results from the United States and Italy.改变对口罩功效的看法和社会规范可增加佩戴口罩以降低新冠病毒风险的实验证据:来自美国和意大利的结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 11;16(10):e0258282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258282. eCollection 2021.
3
Potential lessons from the Taiwan and New Zealand health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic.
台湾和新西兰应对新冠疫情的卫生举措带来的潜在经验教训。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2020 Nov;4:100044. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2020.100044. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
4
Electoral concerns reduce restrictive measures during the COVID-19 pandemic.选举方面的考量减少了新冠疫情期间的限制措施。
J Public Econ. 2021 Jun;198:104387. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2021.104387. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
5
Evaluating the Impact of Intervention Strategies on the First Wave and Predicting the Second Wave of COVID-19 in Thailand: A Mathematical Modeling Study.评估干预策略对泰国第一波新冠疫情的影响并预测第二波疫情:一项数学建模研究
Biology (Basel). 2021 Jan 22;10(2):80. doi: 10.3390/biology10020080.
6
An evidence review of face masks against COVID-19.针对 COVID-19 的口罩有效性评估综述
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jan 26;118(4). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2014564118.
7
Evaluation of Cloth Masks and Modified Procedure Masks as Personal Protective Equipment for the Public During the COVID-19 Pandemic.评估 COVID-19 大流行期间公众用布口罩和改良手术口罩作为个人防护设备的效果。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Apr 1;181(4):463-469. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.8168.
8
Face masks considerably reduce COVID-19 cases in Germany.口罩大大减少了德国的 COVID-19 病例。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Dec 22;117(51):32293-32301. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2015954117. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
9
Voluntary adoption of social welfare-enhancing behavior: Mask-wearing in Spain during the COVID-19 outbreak.自愿采取增进社会福利的行为:COVID-19 爆发期间西班牙的戴口罩行为。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 1;15(12):e0242764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242764. eCollection 2020.
10
Causal impact of masks, policies, behavior on early covid-19 pandemic in the U.S.口罩、政策、行为对美国早期新冠疫情的因果影响
J Econom. 2021 Jan;220(1):23-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Oct 17.