Díaz-Fernández Ángeles, Cortés-Pérez Irene, Obrero-Gaitán Esteban, Ortega-Martínez Ana Raquel, Osuna-Pérez María Catalina, Zagalaz-Anula Noelia, Lomas-Vega Rafael
Department of Health Sciences, University of Jaen, Campus las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaen, Spain.
Department of Psychology, University of Jaen, Campus las Lagunillas s/n, 23071 Jaen, Spain.
J Pers Med. 2024 Aug 26;14(9):903. doi: 10.3390/jpm14090903.
This study evaluated Spanish physiotherapists' orientations toward biopsychosocial and biomedical approaches in chronic pain management through a cross-sectional survey of 447 registered professionals. Validated questionnaires assessed knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs. Multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) identified influential factors and ordinal regression determined the frequency of biopsychosocial application. Content analysis of open-ended responses explored barriers to biopsychosocial implementation. Over 50% of physiotherapists favored the biopsychosocial model, influenced by interdisciplinary work settings, advanced pain knowledge, and specific training. Comprehensive pain knowledge significantly impacted both biomedical and biopsychosocial orientations inversely. The biomedical approach was more prevalent among those with lower education levels and less pain knowledge, particularly at the beginning or over 20 years into their careers. Despite the theoretical preference for biopsychosocial among Spanish physiotherapists, practical application was infrequent, with only 9.8% always using it and 40.7% frequently. Self-reported confidence and skills were crucial determinants of biopsychosocial implementation frequency. Significant barriers included inadequate psychological skills (63.6%), coordination challenges (47.6%), time constraints (43.6%), patient misconceptions (34.2%), and systemic issues. These findings align with international research, highlighting the need to bridge the gap between theoretical knowledge and clinical practice. Addressing these challenges through targeted training and systemic reforms is crucial for improving chronic pain management globally.
本研究通过对447名注册专业人员进行横断面调查,评估了西班牙物理治疗师在慢性疼痛管理中对生物心理社会和生物医学方法的倾向。经过验证的问卷评估了知识、态度和信念。多变量协方差分析(MANCOVA)确定了影响因素,有序回归确定了生物心理社会方法的应用频率。对开放式回答的内容分析探讨了生物心理社会方法实施的障碍。超过50%的物理治疗师倾向于生物心理社会模型,这受到跨学科工作环境、先进的疼痛知识和特定培训的影响。全面的疼痛知识对生物医学和生物心理社会倾向均产生显著的反向影响。生物医学方法在教育水平较低且疼痛知识较少的人群中更为普遍,尤其是在职业生涯开始时或超过20年的从业者中。尽管西班牙物理治疗师在理论上倾向于生物心理社会方法,但实际应用并不常见,只有9.8%的人总是使用该方法,40.7%的人经常使用。自我报告的信心和技能是生物心理社会方法实施频率的关键决定因素。主要障碍包括心理技能不足(63.6%)、协调挑战(47.6%)、时间限制(43.6%)、患者误解(34.2%)和系统性问题。这些发现与国际研究一致,突出了弥合理论知识与临床实践之间差距的必要性。通过有针对性的培训和系统性改革来应对这些挑战,对于在全球范围内改善慢性疼痛管理至关重要。