Suppr超能文献

疼痛神经科学教育对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛和中枢敏化患者的疗效:系统评价。

Effectiveness of Pain Neuroscience Education in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain and Central Sensitization: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

Independent Researcher, 47921 Rimini, Italy.

Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Science, Bologna Campus, University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 24;20(5):4098. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054098.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To collect the available evidence about the effectiveness of pain neuroscience education (PNE) on pain, disability, and psychosocial factors in patients with chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain and central sensitization (CS).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted. Searches were performed on Pubmed, PEDro, and CINAHL, and only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enrolling patients ≥18 years of age with chronic MSK pain due to CS were included. No meta-analysis was conducted, and qualitative analysis was realized.

RESULTS

15 RCTs were included. Findings were divided for diagnostic criteria (fibromyalgia-FM, chronic fatigue syndrome-CFS, low back pain-LBP, chronic spinal pain-CSP). PNE has been proposed as a single intervention or associated with other approaches, and different measures were used for the main outcomes considered. Conclusions, practice implication: PNE is effective in improving pain, disability, and psychosocial factors in patients with fibromyalgia, chronic low back pain (CLBP)-especially if associated with other therapeutic approaches-and also in patients with CFS and CSP. Overall, PNE seems to be more effective when proposed in one-to-one oral sessions and associated with reinforcement elements. However, specific eligibility criteria for chronic MSK pain due to CS are still lacking in most RCTs; therefore, for future research, it is mandatory to specify such criteria in primary studies.

摘要

目的

收集关于疼痛神经科学教育(PNE)对慢性肌肉骨骼(MSK)疼痛和中枢敏化(CS)患者疼痛、残疾和心理社会因素的有效性的现有证据。

方法

进行了系统评价。在 Pubmed、PEDro 和 CINAHL 上进行了检索,仅纳入了纳入年龄≥18 岁、因 CS 导致慢性 MSK 疼痛的患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。未进行荟萃分析,仅进行了定性分析。

结果

纳入了 15 项 RCT。研究结果根据诊断标准(纤维肌痛-FM、慢性疲劳综合征-CFS、下腰痛-LBP、慢性脊柱疼痛-CSP)进行了分类。PNE 被提议作为单一干预措施或与其他方法联合使用,并且主要考虑的结果使用了不同的措施。结论、实践意义:PNE 可有效改善纤维肌痛、慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者的疼痛、残疾和心理社会因素(尤其是与其他治疗方法联合使用时),以及慢性疲劳综合征和 CSP 患者的疼痛、残疾和心理社会因素。总体而言,当以一对一的口头形式提出并结合强化元素时,PNE 似乎更有效。然而,大多数 RCT 中仍然缺乏针对 CS 导致的慢性 MSK 疼痛的具体纳入标准;因此,未来的研究有必要在原始研究中明确这些标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4354/10001851/a6630b63b77d/ijerph-20-04098-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验