Ku Chee Wai, Yusoff Muhammad Ashraf, Ng Elvia Chin Boon, Zheng Ruther Teo, Yap Fabian, Chan Jerry Kok Yen, Loy See Ling
Department of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Road, Singapore 229899, Singapore.
Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Road, Singapore 169857, Singapore.
J Pers Med. 2024 Sep 17;14(9):989. doi: 10.3390/jpm14090989.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Global fertility rates are declining due to metabolic and mental health challenges in women trying to conceive. The Healthy Early Life Moments in Singapore (HELMS) program aims to address these challenges through mobile health (mHealth)-enabled lifestyle interventions. However, the lack of validated evaluation tools for such programs makes it difficult to assess their feasibility and acceptability. To tackle this, a comprehensive evaluation questionnaire was developed and validated to determine if the HELMS preconception program's implementation outcomes were achieved.
The questionnaire development process included a literature review and a two-step validation process: content validation by five content experts and face validation by 20 HELMS participants. Content validation was assessed using the scale content validity index (S-CVI) based on relevance, clarity, simplicity, and ambiguity. Face validation with participants evaluated these criteria and the ease of completing the questionnaire. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha among 49 participants.
The questionnaire achieved good S-CVI values for relevance (0.93), clarity (0.91), simplicity (0.94), and ambiguity (0.71). After expert feedback, the revised version scored highly among HELMS participants for relevance (100%), clarity (95%), simplicity (95%), and non-ambiguity (90%). A Cronbach's alpha of 0.93 indicated good internal consistency.
The HELMS evaluation questionnaire shows promise for evaluating similar mHealth-based lifestyle intervention programs globally.
背景/目的:由于试图受孕的女性面临代谢和心理健康挑战,全球生育率正在下降。新加坡健康早期生活时刻(HELMS)项目旨在通过移动健康(mHealth)支持的生活方式干预来应对这些挑战。然而,此类项目缺乏经过验证的评估工具,难以评估其可行性和可接受性。为解决这一问题,开发并验证了一份综合评估问卷,以确定HELMS孕前项目的实施成果是否达成。
问卷开发过程包括文献综述和两步验证过程:由五位内容专家进行内容验证,以及由20名HELMS参与者进行表面效度验证。内容验证使用基于相关性、清晰度、简单性和模糊性的量表内容效度指数(S-CVI)进行评估。与参与者进行的表面效度验证评估了这些标准以及问卷填写的难易程度。在49名参与者中使用克朗巴哈系数评估内部一致性。
问卷在相关性(0.93)、清晰度(0.91)、简单性(0.94)和模糊性(0.71)方面取得了良好的S-CVI值。经过专家反馈,修订版在HELMS参与者中在相关性(100%)、清晰度(95%)、简单性(95%)和无歧义性(90%)方面得分很高。克朗巴哈系数为0.93表明内部一致性良好。
HELMS评估问卷有望在全球范围内评估类似的基于mHealth的生活方式干预项目。